Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

27-10-2021

A Psychometric Investigation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale Using Bifactor Modeling: Evidence for the Unidimensional Structure of the Measure

Auteurs: Kevin G. Saulnier, Shelby J. Saulnier, Nicholas P. Allan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 1/2022

Abstract

Perfectionistic self-presentation (PSP) is a transdiagnostic risk factor typically assessed using the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale (PSPS). The PSPS consists of three subscales, Self-Promotion, Nondisplay of Imperfection, and Nondisclosure of Imperfection. Overlap among these factors and inconsistent evidence for discriminant validity suggests a need to psychometrically evaluate the PSPS to determine the dimensionality of this measure. The current study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in a sample of community adults (N = 419; M age = 39.9 years; 67.1% female) to examine the factor structure of the PSPS. Model fit was compared for one-factor, three-factor, and bifactor models. The bifactor model, comprising a general PSP factor and orthogonal Self-Promotion, Nondisplay, and Nondisclosure factors had the best overall model fit. The general PSP factor was reliable and well-represented by its indicators. Additionally, the general PSP factor was related to several forms of psychopathology and related constructs (i.e., social anxiety, depression, negative affect, body dissatisfaction), whereas specific PSP factors were not related to outcome variables. Finally, the general PSP factor explained a large amount of the variance in PSPS scores, suggesting the measure is unidimensional. Findings support treating the PSPS total score as a unidimensional measure of PSP in research and intervention efforts.

vorige artikel The Role of Parental Anxiety Sensitivity and Beliefs About Child Anxiety in the Relationship Between Parent and Child Anxiety

volgende artikel An Examination of the Parent-Rated Adolescent Academic Problems Checklist: What Do Parents Really Know?

Allan, N. P., Albanese, B. J., Short, N. A., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2015). Support for the general and specific bifactor model factors of anxiety sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.003CrossRef

Allan, N. P., Gros, D. F., Hom, M. A., Joiner, T. E., & Stecker, T. (2016). Suicidal ideation and interpersonal needs: Factor structure of a short version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire in an at-risk military sample. Psychiatry, 79, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2016.1185893CrossRefPubMed

Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596CrossRef

Borroni, S., Bortolla, R., Lombardi, L. M. G., Somma, A., Maffei, C., & Fossati, A. (2016). The Italian version of Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale: Psychometric proprieties and its associations with pathological narcissism and adult attachment in an adult non clinical sample. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1328CrossRefPubMed

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (Second Edi). Guilford Press.

Burnham, M. J., Le, Y. K., & Piedmont, R. L. (2018). Who is Mturk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21, 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394CrossRef

Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3

Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805CrossRefPubMed

Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7, 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10CrossRef

Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597624CrossRef

DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6CrossRef

Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.009CrossRefPubMed

Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2014). The destructiveness of perfectionism revisited: Implications for the assessment of suicide risk and the prevention of suicide. Review of General Psychology, 18, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000011CrossRef

Flett, G. L., Nepon, T., Hewitt, P. L., Molnar, D. S., & Zhao, W. (2016). Projecting perfection by hiding effort: Supplementing the perfectionistic self-presentation scale with a brief self-presentation measure. Self and Identity, 15, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1119188CrossRef

Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10CrossRef

Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., Pollack, L. O., Dunbar, D., Luo, J., Patterson, K., & Watson, D. (2013). Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychological Assessment, 25, 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032639CrossRefPubMed

Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295430CrossRef

Greene, A. L., Eaton, N. R., Li, K., Forbes, M. K., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Kotov, R. (2019). Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(7), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000434CrossRefPubMed

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.). Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog, (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Hewitt, P L, Flett, G. L., & Ediger, E. (1995). Perfectionism traits and perfectionistic self-presentation in eating disorder attitudes, characteristics, and symptoms. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18, 317–326. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8580917

Hewitt, P. L., Habke, A. M., Lee-Baggley, D. L., Sherry, S. B., & Flett, G. L. (2008). The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 71, 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2008.71.2.93CrossRef

Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., Sherry, S. B., Habke, M., Parkin, M., Lam, R. W., & Stein, M. B. (2003). The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1303CrossRefPubMed

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648CrossRef

Hughes, G. D. (2009). The impact of incorrect responses to reverse-coded survey items. Research in the Schools, 16, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12455170CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Knight, R. G., Chisholm, B. J., Marsh, N. V., & Godfrey, H. P. (1988). Some normative, reliability, and factor analytic data for the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 203–206. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3360935

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R., & Williams, W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lee, D.-G., Suh, H., & Lee, H.-K. (2011). Factor structure of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale in Korea. Psychological Reports, 109, 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.08.21.PR0.109.6.990-1000CrossRefPubMed

Li, Z., Gooden, C. J., & Toland, M. D. (2016). Measurement invariance with categorical indicators. In Applied Quantitative and Psychometric Series.

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Lo, A., Hunt, C., & Abbott, M. J. (2020). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of multidimensional trait perfectionism self-report measures. Behaviour Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2020.2

Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130CrossRef

Mackinnon, S. P., Battista, S. R., Sherry, S. B., & Stewart, S. H. (2014). Perfectionistic self-presentation predicts social anxiety using daily diary methods. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.038CrossRef

Mackinnon, S. P., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2012.02.010CrossRef

Martin, A., Rief, W., Klaiberg, A., & Braehler, E. (2006). Validity of the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.003CrossRefPubMed

McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Lawrence Erlbaum.

McGee, B. J., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, S. B., Parkin, M., & Flett, G. L. (2005). Perfectionistic self-presentation, body image, and eating disorder symptoms. Body Image, 2, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.01.002CrossRefPubMed

Melnick, S. A., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The use of negative item stems: A cautionary note. Educational Research Quarterly, 14, 31–36. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ429474

Morgan, G., Hodge, K., Wells, K., & Watkins, M. (2015). Are fit indices biased in favor of bi-factor models in cognitive ability research?: A comparison of fit in correlated factors, higher-order, and bi-factor models via monte carlo simulations. Journal of Intelligence, 3(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3010002CrossRef

Mortensen, K., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33, 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mushquash, A. R., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Understanding the socially prescribed perfectionist’s cycle of self-defeat: A 7-day, 14-occasion daily diary study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2012.08.006CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2021). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

Nepon, T., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Molnar, D. S. (2011). Perfectionism, negative social feedback, and interpersonal rumination in depression and social anxiety. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025032CrossRef

Peters, L., Sunderland, M., Andrews, G., Rapee, R. M., & Mattick, R. P. (2012). Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: The SIAS-6 and the SPS-6. Psychological Assessment, 24, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024544CrossRefPubMed

Pilotte, W. J., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490503016CrossRef

Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3CrossRefPubMed

Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437CrossRefPubMed

Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249CrossRefPubMed

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016) Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods 21(2) 137-150 10.1037/met0000045CrossRefPubMed

Roxborough, H. M., Hewitt, P. L., Kaldas, J., Flett, G. L., Caelian, C. M., Sherry, S., & Sherry, D. L. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation, socially prescribed perfectionism, and suicide in youth: A test of the perfectionism social disconnection model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00084.xCrossRefPubMed

Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using mechanical turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612469015CrossRef

Sherry, S. B., Vriend, J. L., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, D. L., Flett, G. L., & Wardrop, A. A. (2009). Perfectionism dimensions, appearance schemas, and body image disturbance in community members and university students. Body Image, 6, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BODYIM.2008.12.002CrossRefPubMed

Stone, A. A., Walentynowicz, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Wen, C. K. (2019). MTurk participants have substantially lower evaluative subjective well-being than other survey participants. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.12.042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education Inc.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3397865

Watts, A. L., Poore, H. E., & Waldman, I. D. (2019). Riskier tests of the validity of the bifactor model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619855035CrossRef

Weems, G. H., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 166–176. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/f7c78553107401ba384087862bac7a07/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=34423

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, (pp. 56–75).

Titel: A Psychometric Investigation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale Using Bifactor Modeling: Evidence for the Unidimensional Structure of the Measure
Auteurs: Kevin G. Saulnier
Shelby J. Saulnier
Nicholas P. Allan
Publicatiedatum: 27-10-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09920-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

A Psychometric Investigation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale Using Bifactor Modeling: Evidence for the Unidimensional Structure of the Measure

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2022

Introduction to the Special Section: What Do We Know About the Psychophysiology of Child Psychopathy and Conduct Problems?

An Examination of the Parent-Rated Adolescent Academic Problems Checklist: What Do Parents Really Know?

Psychopathy, the Four Facet Model, and Fearlessness: Testing Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous System Reactivity in a Late Adolescent Sample

Psychopathy and Resting State EEG Theta/Beta Oscillations in Adolescent Offenders

Antisocial Traits and Risky Sexual Behavior in Inpatient Adolescents

Examining the Dimensionality of Anxiety and Depression: a Latent Profile Approach to Modeling Transdiagnostic Features

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Introduction to the Special Section: What Do We Know About the Psychophysiology of Child Psychopathy and Conduct Problems?

An Examination of the Parent-Rated Adolescent Academic Problems Checklist: What Do Parents Really Know?

Psychopathy, the Four Facet Model, and Fearlessness: Testing Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous System Reactivity in a Late Adolescent Sample

Psychopathy and Resting State EEG Theta/Beta Oscillations in Adolescent Offenders

Antisocial Traits and Risky Sexual Behavior in Inpatient Adolescents

Examining the Dimensionality of Anxiety and Depression: a Latent Profile Approach to Modeling Transdiagnostic Features