Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-07-2012 | Original Article

Bidirectional semantic interference between action and speech

Auteurs: Roman Liepelt, Thomas Dolk, Wolfgang Prinz

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Research on embodied cognition assumes that language processing involves modal simulations that recruit the same neural systems that are usually used for action execution. If this is true, one should find evidence for bidirectional crosstalk between action and language. Using a direct matching paradigm, this study tested if action–languages interactions are bidirectional (Experiments 1 and 2), and whether the effect of crosstalk between action perception and language production is due to facilitation or interference (Experiment 3). Replicating previous findings, we found evidence for crosstalk when manual actions had to be performed simultaneously to action–word perception (Experiment 1) and also when language had to be produced during simultaneous perception of hand actions (Experiment 2). These findings suggest a clear bidirectional relationship between action and language. The latter crosstalk effect was due to interference between action and language (Experiment 3). By extending previous research of embodied cognition, the present findings provide novel evidence suggesting that bidirectional functional relations between action and language are based on similar conceptual–semantic representations.
vorige artikel Online prediction of others’ actions: the contribution of the target object, action context and movement kinematics
volgende artikel Language-induced modulation during the prediction of others’ actions
Literatuur
Barsalou, L. W. (2007). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Beringer, J. (2000). Experimental Runtime System (Version 3.32). [Computer software]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: BeriSoft Corporation.
Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2005). Speech and gesture share the same communication system. Neuropsychologia, 44, 178–190.PubMedCrossRef
Bertenthal, B. I., Longo, M. R., & Kosobud, A. (2006). Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 210–225.PubMedCrossRef
Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, 260–267.PubMedCrossRef
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Déprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behaviour in the first 200 ms of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1607–1615.PubMedCrossRef
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cognition, 44, 124–143.CrossRef
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, B., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355–363.PubMedCrossRef
Chersi, F., Thill, S., Ziemke, T., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). Sentence processing: linking language to motor chains. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 4, 4.PubMedCrossRef
D’Ausilio, A., Pulvermüller, F., Salmas, P., et al. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19, 381–385.PubMedCrossRef
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadardy, B., Woods, R., et al. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602.PubMedCrossRef
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402.PubMedCrossRef
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593–609.PubMedCrossRef
Gentilucci, M., & Dalla Volta, R. (2008). Spoken language and arm gesture are controlled by the same motor control system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 944–957.CrossRef
Gentilucci, M., Dalla Volta, R., & Gianelli, C. (2008). When the hand speak. Journal of Physiology–Paris, 102, 21–30.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.CrossRef
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008a). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291.PubMedCrossRef
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008b). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 905–919.CrossRef
Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18, 928–937.PubMedCrossRef
Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253–261.PubMedCrossRef
Iacoboni, M., & Wilson, S. M. (2006). Beyond a single area: Motor control and language within a neural architecture encompassing Broca’s area. Cortex, 42, 503–506.PubMedCrossRef
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.PubMedCrossRef
Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 508–529.CrossRef
Koski, L., Wohlschläger, A., Bekkering, H., Woods, R. P., Dubeau, M.-C., Mazziotta, J. C., et al. (2002). Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 847–855.PubMedCrossRef
Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y. S., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(6), 533–552.CrossRef
Krauss, R. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., & Colasante, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 743–754.PubMedCrossRef
Levelt, W. J., Richardson, G., & La Heij, W. (1985). Pointing and voicing in deictic expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 133–164.CrossRef
Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008a). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578–591.PubMedCrossRef
Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008b). How do we infer others’ goals from non-stereotypic actions? The outcome of context-sensitive inferential processing in right inferior parietal and posterior temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 43, 784–792.PubMedCrossRef
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology–Paris, 102, 59–70.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192.CrossRef
Nishitani, N., Schürmann, M., Amunts, K., & Hari, R. (2005). Broca’s region: From action to language. Physiology, 20, 60–69.PubMedCrossRef
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.PubMedCrossRef
Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 632–640.PubMedCrossRef
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.PubMedCrossRef
Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 351–360.PubMedCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.PubMedCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1999). From grasping to speech: Imitation might provide a missing link: Reply. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 152.PubMedCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.PubMedCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.PubMedCrossRef
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.PubMedCrossRef
Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lindemann, O., van Rooij, D., van Dam, W., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Effects of intentional motor actions on embodied language processing. Experimental Psychology, 57, 260–266.PubMedCrossRef
Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105, 83–90.PubMedCrossRef
Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2141–2158.PubMedCrossRef
Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 1746–1759.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., et al. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273–281.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Bidirectional semantic interference between action and speech
Auteurs
Roman Liepelt
Thomas Dolk
Wolfgang Prinz
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0390-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2012

Representing others’ actions: the role of expertise in the aging mind

  • Original Article

Online prediction of others’ actions: the contribution of the target object, action context and movement kinematics

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Neural theory for the perception of causal actions

  • Original Article

Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions

  • Original Article

Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: time-dependent encoding of grip force in the primary motor cortex

  • Original Article

Predicting others’ actions via grasp and gaze: evidence for distinct brain networks

  • Original Article