Top

Gepubliceerd in:

07-05-2020 | Original Article

Bilinguals’ inhibitory control and attentional processes in a visual perceptual task

Auteurs: Marina C. Wimmer, Christina Marx, Steven Stirk, Peter J. B. Hancock

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

The aim was to examine theories of bilingual inhibitory control superiority in the visual domain. In an ambiguous figure task, the ability to reverse (switch) interpretations (e.g., duck-rabbit) was examined in 3–5-year-olds bilinguals and monolinguals (N = 67). Bilingualism was no performance predictor in conceptual tasks (Droodle task, false belief task, ambiguous figures production task) that did not pose inhibitory demands. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in the ability to reverse, suggesting superior inhibitory capacity per se. Once reversal was experienced there was no difference in the time it took to reverse or reversal frequency between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bayesian analyses confirmed statistical result patterns. Findings support the established view of bilinguals’ superior domain-general inhibitory control. This might be brought to bear by attending the environment differently.

vorige artikel Inhibitory mechanisms in motor imagery: disentangling different forms of inhibition using action mode switching

volgende artikel Moderate acute alcohol use impairs intentional inhibition rather than stimulus-driven inhibition

Alais, D., van Boxtel, J. J., Parker, A., & van Ee, R. (2010). Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 50, 929–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010.CrossRefPubMed

Antón, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., Estévez, A., Hernández, J. A., Castillo, A., Fuentes, L. J., et al. (2014). Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398.CrossRefPubMed

Beck, S. R., Robinson, A. N., Ahmed, S., & Abid, R. (2011). Children’s understanding that ambiguous figures have multiple interpretations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2010.515885.CrossRef

Bialystok, E. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00351.x.CrossRefPubMed

Bialystok, E., & Shapero, D. (2005). Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science, 8, 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00451.x.CrossRefPubMed

Bialystok, E., Martin, M. M., & Viswanathan, M. (2005). Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 103–119.CrossRef

Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Blaye, A., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2010). Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.516420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2013). Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.812093.CrossRef

Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marina, V. (2014). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in stimulus-stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000564.CrossRef

Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. M. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11, 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14677687.2008.00675.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/14678624.00333.CrossRefPubMed

Chandler, M. J., & Helm, D. (1984). Developmental changes in the contribution of shared experience to social role-taking competence. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 7, 145–156.CrossRef

Chung-Fat-Yim, A., Sorge, G. B., & Bialystok, E. (2017). The relationship between bilingualism and selective attention in young adults: Evidence from an ambiguous figures task. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1221435.CrossRef

Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

Doherty, M. J., & Wimmer, M. C. (2005). Children’s understanding of ambiguous figures: Which cognitive developments are necessary to experience reversal? Cognitive Development, 20, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.003.CrossRef

Duñbeitia, J. A., Hernández, J. A., Antón, E., Macizo, P., Estévez, A., Fuentes, L. J., et al. (2014). The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited. Experimental Psychology, 61, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000243.CrossRef

Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Sewell, J., Styles, B., Brzyska, B., Shamsan, Y., et al. (2007). The british picture vocabulary scale (3rd ed.). UK: GL Assessment.

Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., Cruz-Santos, A., Tourinho, C. J., Martin, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism enriches the poor: Enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children. Psychological Science., 23, 1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443836.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Esposito, A. G., Baker-Ward, L., & Mueller, S. (2013). Interference suppression vs. response inhibition: An explanation for the absence of a bilingual advantage in preschoolers’ Stroop task performance. Cognitive Development, 28, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed

Gathercole, V. C. M., Thomas, E. M., Jones, L., Guash, N. V., Young, N., & Hughes, E. K. (2010). Cognitive effects of bilingualism: digging deeper for the contributions of language dominance, linguistic knowledge, socio-economic status and cognitive abilities. Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 617–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2010.488289.CrossRef

Gathercole, V. C. M., Thomas, E. M., Kennedy, I., Prys, C., Young, N., Guasch, N. V., et al. (2014). Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from pre-schoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00011.CrossRefPubMed

Goetz, P. J. (2003). The effect of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001007.CrossRef

Gopnik, A., & Rosati, A. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representation. Developmental Science, 4, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00163.CrossRef

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133.CrossRef

Hernández, M., Costa, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Escaping capture: Bilingualism modulates distraction from working memory. Cognition, 122, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

Hilchey, M. D., Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2015). Does bilingual exercise enhance cognitive fitness in traditional non-linguistic executive processing tasks? In J. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 586–613). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447257.026.CrossRef

Intaité, M., Koivisto, M., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2014). Event-related potential responses to perceptual reversals are modulated by working memory load. Neuropsychologia, 56, 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.016.CrossRefPubMed

Jastrow, J. (1900). Fact and fable in psychology. Oxford, England: Houghton.CrossRef

Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kovács, A. M. (2009). Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning. Developmental Science, 12, 48–54.CrossRef

Ladas, A. I., Carroll, D. J., & Vivas, A. B. (2015). Attentional processes in low-socioeconomic status bilingual children: Are they modulated by the amount of bilingual experience? Child Development, 86, 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12332.CrossRefPubMed

Lehtonen, M., Soveri, A., Laine, A., Järvenpää, J., de Bruin, A., & Antfolk, J. (2018). Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 394–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000142.CrossRefPubMed

Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003227.CrossRef

Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.7.2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

Morton, B. J., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14677687.2007.00623.x.CrossRefPubMed

Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014.CrossRefPubMed

Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1991). Directing spatial attention within an object: Altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.170.CrossRefPubMed

Poarch, G. J., & van Hell, J. G. (2012). Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.013.CrossRefPubMed

Ross, J., & Melinger, A. (2016). Bilingual advantage, bidialectal advantage or neither? Comparing performance across three tests of executive function in middle childhood. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12405.CrossRefPubMed

Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.CrossRef

Scocchia, L., Valsecchi, M., & Triesch, J. (2014). Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: The role of stable and transient states of the observer. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00979.CrossRefPubMed

Sorge, G. B., Toplak, M. E., & Bialystok, E. (2017). Interactions between levels of attention ability and levels of bilingualism in children’s executive functioning. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12408.CrossRefPubMed

Wimmer, M. C., & Doherty, M. J. (2007). Investigating children's eye-movements: Cause or effect of reversing ambiguous figures? In: 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp 1659–1664.

Wimmer, M. C., & Doherty, M. J. (2010). Children with autism’s perception and understanding of ambiguous figures: Evidence for pictorial metarepresentation, a research note. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X465362.CrossRef

Wimmer, M. C., & Doherty, M. J. (2011). The development of ambiguous figure perception. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(1), 1–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00590.x.CrossRef

Wimmer, M. C., & Marx, C. (2014). Inhibitory processes in visual perception: A bilingual advantage. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.004.CrossRefPubMed

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Bilinguals’ inhibitory control and attentional processes in a visual perceptual task
Auteurs: Marina C. Wimmer
Christina Marx
Steven Stirk
Peter J. B. Hancock
Publicatiedatum: 07-05-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01333-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls

Open Access
Original Article

Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will

Open Access
Original Article

Does audience size influence actors’ and spectators’ emotions the same way?

Original Article

Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training

Open Access
Original Article

The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning

Original Article

People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires

Open Access
Original Article

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Bilinguals’ inhibitory control and attentional processes in a visual perceptual task

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls

Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will

Does audience size influence actors’ and spectators’ emotions the same way?

Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training

The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning

People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls

Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will

Does audience size influence actors’ and spectators’ emotions the same way?

Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training

The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning

People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires