Top

Gepubliceerd in:

21-11-2021 | Original Article

Can the early visual processing of others’ actions be related to social power and dominance?

Auteurs: Jérémy Decroix, Laurent Ott, Nicolas Morgado, Solène Kalénine

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2022

Abstract

Although goals often drive action understanding, this ability is also prone to important variability among individuals, which may have its origin in individual social characteristics. The present study aimed at evaluating the relationship between the tendency to prioritize goal information over grip information during early visual processing of action and several social dimensions. Visual processing of grip and goal information during action recognition was evaluated in 64 participants using the priming protocol developed by Decroix and Kalénine (Exp Brain Res 236(8):2411–2426, 2018). Object-directed action photographs were primed by photographs sharing the same goal and/or the same grip. The effects of goal and grip priming on action recognition were evaluated for different prime durations. The same participants further fulfilled questionnaires characterizing the way individuals deal with their social environment, namely their sense of social power, dominance, perspective taking, and construal level. At the group level, results confirmed greater goal than grip priming effects on action recognition for the shortest prime duration. Regression analyses between the pattern of response times in the action priming protocol and scores at the questionnaires further showed that the advantage of goal over grip priming was associated with higher sense of social power, and possibly to lower dominance. Overall, data confirm that observers tend to prioritize goal-related information when processing visual actions but further indicate that this tendency is sensitive to individual social characteristics. Results suggest that goal information may not always drive action understanding and point out the connection between low-level processing of observed actions and more general individual characteristics.

vorige artikel Visual–haptic integration, action and embodiment in virtual reality

volgende artikel The characterization of actions at the superordinate, basic and subordinate level

In contrast to Bayesian multilevel analyses, the computation of the split-half reliability index does not accommodate missing data points and was based on 48 participants out of 64.

Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Hassin, R. R. (2004). Goal contagion: perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23CrossRefPubMed

Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.xCrossRefPubMed

Bach, P., Nicholson, T., & Hudson, M. (2014). The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00254CrossRef

Bach, P., & Schenke, K. C. (2017). Predictive social perception: towards a unifying framework from action observation to person knowledge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(7), e12312. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12312CrossRef

Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72(3), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00310CrossRefPubMed

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001CrossRef

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., & Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-zCrossRefPubMed

Berger, C. R. (2008). Power, dominance, and social interaction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp093CrossRef

Bird, G., & Viding, E. (2014). The self to other model of empathy: providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021CrossRefPubMed

Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In The psychology of social status (pp. 71–95). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7

Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y. R. (2016). Looking out from the top: differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216636628CrossRefPubMed

Borgomaneri, S., Gazzola, V., & Avenanti, A. (2015). Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two functionally distinct stages of motor cortex involvement during perception of emotional body language. Brain Structure and Function, 220(5), 2765–2781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0825-6CrossRefPubMed

Buresh, J. S., & Woodward, A. L. (2007). Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition, 104(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.001CrossRefPubMed

Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01

Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01

Champely, S. (2020). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.3–0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr

Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004CrossRef

Cheng, Y., Yang, C. Y., Lin, C. P., Lee, P. L., & Decety, J. (2008). The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: a magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage, 40(4), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.064CrossRefPubMed

Chiu, C. Y., Balkundi, P., & Weinberg, F. J. (2017). When managers become leaders: the role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers’ perception of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.004CrossRef

Csibra, G. (2008). Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Attention and performance XXII. Oxford University Press.

Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1611CrossRefPubMed

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113CrossRef

Decroix, J., Borgomaneri, S., Kalénine, S., & Avenanti, A. (2020a). State-dependent TMS of inferior frontal and parietal cortices highlights integration of grip configuration and functional goals during action recognition. Cortex, 132, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.004CrossRefPubMed

Decroix, J., & Kalénine, S. (2018). Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study. Experimental Brain Research, 236(8), 2411–2426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5309-0CrossRefPubMed

Decroix, J., & Kalénine, S. (2019). What first drives visual attention during the recognition of object-directed actions? The role of kinematics and goal information. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2400–2409. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7CrossRef

Decroix, J., Roger, C., & Kalénine, S. (2020b). Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others’ actions with objects: an ERP study. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5065. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61963-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deschrijver, E., & Palmer, C. (2020). Reframing social cognition: relational versus representational mentalizing. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000302CrossRefPubMed

DiGirolamo MA, Simon JC, Hubley KM, Kopulsky A, Gutsell JN (2019) Clarifying the relationship between trait empathy and action-based resonance indexed by EEG mu-rhythm suppression. Neuropsychologia 133:107172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Donnarumma, F., Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Friston, K., & Pezzulo, G. (2017). Action perception as hypothesis testing. Cortex, 89, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fiebich, A., & Coltheart, M. (2015). Various ways to understand other minds: towards a pluralistic approach to the explanation of social understanding. Mind & Language, 30(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12079CrossRef

Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2016). Power and perspective-taking: a critical examination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 91–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.12.002CrossRef

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.xCrossRefPubMed

Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Keysers, C. (2006). Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current Biology, 16(18), 1824–1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.072CrossRefPubMed

Gilet, A. L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Griihn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A french validation of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030425CrossRef

Hassin, R. R., Aarts, H., & Ferguson, M. J. (2005). Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.008CrossRef

Hommel, B. (2014). The role of action semantics in action control. Comment on “Action semantics: a unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge” by Michiel van Elk, Hein van Schie and Harold Bekkering. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(2), 259–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.01.010CrossRefPubMed

Hrkać, M., Wurm, M. F., & Schubotz, R. I. (2014). Action observers implicitly expect actors to act goal-coherently, even if they do not: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 35(5), 2178–2190. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22319CrossRefPubMed

Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.003CrossRefPubMed

Jia, L., Koh, A. H. Q., & Tan, F. M. (2018). Asymmetric goal contagion: social power attenuates goal contagion among strangers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(5), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2360CrossRef

Kilner, J. M. (2011). More than one pathway to action understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Koul, A., Soriano, M., Tversky, B., Becchio, C., & Cavallo, A. (2019). The kinematics that you do not expect: integrating prior information and kinematics to understand intentions. Cognition, 182(October), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.006CrossRefPubMed

Kozak, M. N., & MarshWegner, A. D. M. (2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.543CrossRefPubMed

Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 251524592095150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503CrossRef

Laurin, K. (2016). Interpersonal influences on goals: Current and future directions for goal contagion research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12289CrossRef

Lima Portugal, L. C., Alves, R. C. S., Junior, O. F., Sanchez, T. A., Mocaiber, I., Volchan, E., Smith Erthal, F., David, I. A., Kim, J., Oliveira, L., Padmala, S., Chen, G., Pessoa, L., & Pereira, M. G. (2020). Interactions between emotion and action in the brain. NeuroImage, 214(March), 116728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116728CrossRefPubMed

Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford University Press.

Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). Performance: an R Package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139CrossRef

Marsh, A. A., Kozak, M. N., Wegner, D. M., Reid, M. E., Yu, H. H., & Blair, R. J. R. (2010). The neural substrates of action identification. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429029608CrossRef

McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). Abandon statistical significance. The American Statistician, 73(supp1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253CrossRef

Moskowitz, G. B., & Olcaysoy Okten, I. (2016). Spontaneous goal inference (SGI). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12232CrossRef

Nicholson, T., Roser, M., & Bach, P. (2017). Understanding the goals of everyday instrumental actions is primarily linked to object, not motor-kinematic, information: evidence from fMRI. PLoS ONE, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169700CrossRef

Novack, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Gesture as representational action: a paper about function. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1145-zCrossRef

Novack, M. A., Wakefield, E. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). What makes a movement a gesture? Cognition, 146, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.014CrossRefPubMed

Olcaysoy Okten, I., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2018). Goal versus trait explanations: causal attributions beyond the trait-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000104CrossRefPubMed

Olcaysoy Okten, I., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2020). Spontaneous goal versus spontaneous trait inferences: How ideology shapes attributions and explanations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2611CrossRef

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4CrossRefPubMed

Ondobaka, S., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Conceptual and perceptuo-motor action control and action recognition. Cortex, 49(10), 2966–2967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.005CrossRefPubMed

Parsons, S. (2021). splithalf: robust estimates of split half reliability. Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03041

Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919879695CrossRef

Pfeifer, J. H., Iacoboni, M., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2008). Mirroring others’ emotions relates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children. NeuroImage, 39(4), 2076–2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.032CrossRefPubMed

Pobric, G., & de Hamilton, A. F. C. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Current Biology, 16(5), 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.033CrossRefPubMed

Pomiechowska, B., & Csibra, G. (2017). Motor activation during action perception depends on action interpretation. Neuropsychologia, 105(October), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Quesque, F., & Brass, M. (2019). The role of the temporoparietal junction in self-other distinction. Brain Topography, 32(6), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00737-5CrossRefPubMed

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

Rizzolatti, G., & Fogassi, L. (2014). The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1644), 20130420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0420CrossRef

Schenke, K. C., Wyer, N. A., & Bach, P. (2016). The things you do: Internal models of others’ expected behaviour guide action observation. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0158910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158910CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smith, P. K., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The nonconscious nature of power: cues and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 918–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00300.xCrossRef

Spaulding, S. (2018). Do you see what I see? How social differences influence mindreading. Synthese, 195(9), 4009–4030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1404-1CrossRef

Thioux, M., & Keysers, C. (2015). Object visibility alters the relative contribution of ventral visual stream and mirror neuron system to goal anticipation during action observation. NeuroImage, 105, 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.035CrossRefPubMed

Tidoni, E., Borgomaneri, S., di Pellegrino, G., & Avenanti, A. (2013). Action simulation plays a critical role in deceptive action recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(2), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2228-11.2013CrossRefPubMed

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Uithol, S., & Maranesi, M. (2014). No need to match: a comment on Bach, Nicholson and Hudson’s “Affordance-Matching Hypothesis.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(September), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00710CrossRef

Uithol, S., & Paulus, M. (2014). What do infants understand of others’ action? A theoretical account of early social cognition. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78(5), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0519-3CrossRefPubMed

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Action Identification Theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume 1 (Issue September, pp. 327–348). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n17

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3CrossRef

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660CrossRef

van Elk, M., Van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Conceptual knowledge for understanding other’s actions is organized primarily around action goals. Experimental Brain Research, 189(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1408-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

van Elk, M., van Schie, H., & Bekkering, H. (2014). Action semantics: a unifying conceptual framework for the selective use of multimodal and modality-specific object knowledge. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(2), 220–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.005CrossRefPubMed

Wessler, J., & Hansen, J. (2016). The effect of psychological distance on automatic goal contagion. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 1(1–3), 51–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1288877CrossRefPubMed

Westra, E. (2019). Stereotypes, theory of mind, and the action–prediction hierarchy. Synthese, 196(7), 2821–2846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1575-9CrossRef

Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630CrossRef

Witkower, Z., Tracy, J. L., Cheng, J. T., & Henrich, J. (2020). Two signals of social rank: prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000181CrossRefPubMed

Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3CrossRefPubMed

Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29CrossRef

Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., & Zhang, D. (2011). FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8(20), 2378–2386.CrossRef

Titel: Can the early visual processing of others’ actions be related to social power and dominance?
Auteurs: Jérémy Decroix
Laurent Ott
Nicolas Morgado
Solène Kalénine
Publicatiedatum: 21-11-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01617-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking

Open Access
Original Article

Temporal integration of feature probability distributions

Original Article

Building and validation of a set of facial expression images to detect emotions: a transcultural study

Original Article

The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory

Original Article

The relations between personality, components of executive functions, and intelligence in children and young adults

Open Access
Original Article

The limits of automatic sensorimotor processing during word processing: investigations with repeated linguistic experience, memory consolidation during sleep, and rich linguistic learning contexts

Open Access
Original Article

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Can the early visual processing of others’ actions be related to social power and dominance?

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking

Temporal integration of feature probability distributions

Building and validation of a set of facial expression images to detect emotions: a transcultural study

The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory

The relations between personality, components of executive functions, and intelligence in children and young adults

The limits of automatic sensorimotor processing during word processing: investigations with repeated linguistic experience, memory consolidation during sleep, and rich linguistic learning contexts

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking

Temporal integration of feature probability distributions

Building and validation of a set of facial expression images to detect emotions: a transcultural study

The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory

The relations between personality, components of executive functions, and intelligence in children and young adults

The limits of automatic sensorimotor processing during word processing: investigations with repeated linguistic experience, memory consolidation during sleep, and rich linguistic learning contexts