Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2007

Clinically meaningful improvement on the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction

Auteurs: Joseph C. Cappelleri, Stanley E. Althof, Michael P. O’Leary, Sidney Glina, Rosie King, Vera J. Stecher, Martin Carlsson, Richard L. Siegel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the minimal clinically meaningful improvement (MCMI) on the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire.

Methods

Using combined data from the 2 pivotal SEAR trials of men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED), MCMIs were estimated as the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence intervals of SEAR mean change scores (from baseline to end of study) for 2 anchor groups: (1) men who improved 1 ED severity category on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, and (2) men who improved 5–60% (inclusive) on these erectile function scores.

Results

Both anchors gave comparable results. A 10-point MCMI was proposed because the estimates of 95% lower bounds centered on around 10 points for most SEAR components (Sexual Relationship, Confidence, Self-Esteem, Overall Score). An exception was the Overall Relationship whose 95% lower bounds were too low to recommend them as an MCMI.

Conclusions

Two anchor-based approaches suggest that a change of about 10 points represents an MCMI on most components of the SEAR questionnaire.
vorige artikel Validity of patient-reported health-related quality of life global ratings of change using structural equation modeling
volgende artikel The effects of response bias on self-reported quality of life among childhood cancer survivors
Literatuur
1.
Cappelleri, J. C., Althof, S. E., Siegel, R. L., Shpilsky, A., Bell, S. S., & Duttagupta, S. (2004). Development and validation of the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire in erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research, 16, 30–38.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Althof, S. E., Cappelleri, J. C., Shpilsky, A., Stecher, V., Diuguid, C., Sweeney, M., et al. (2003). Treatment responsiveness of the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in erectile dysfunction. Urology, 61, 888–892.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Steidle, C. P., Stecher, V. J., Pace, C., & Tseng, L. J. (2006). Correlation of improved erectile function and rate of successful intercourse with improved emotional well-being assessed with the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and stratified by age. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 22, 939–948.PubMedCrossRef
4.
O’Leary, M. P., Althof, S. E., Cappelleri, J. C., Crowley, A., Sherman, N., Duttagupta, S., et al (2006). Self-esteem, confidence, and relationship satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the United States. Journal of Urology, 175, 1058–1062.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Althof, S. E., O’Leary, M. P., Cappelleri, J. C., Hvidsten, K., Stecher, V. J., Glina, S., et al. (2006). Sildenafil citrate improves self-esteem, confidence, and relationships in men with erectile dysfunction: Results from an international, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3, 521–529.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Althof, S. E., O’Leary, M. P., Cappelleri, J. C., Glina, S., King, R., Tseng, L.-J., et al. (2006). Self-esteem, confidence, and relationships in men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate: Pooled analysis of two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 1069–1074.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Cappelleri, J. C., Althof, S. E., Siegel, R. L., Stecher, V. J., Tseng, L. J., & Duttagupta, S. (2005). Association between the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire following treatment with sildenafil citrate for men with erectile dysfunction. Value in Health, 8(suppl 1), S54–S60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Althof, S. E., O’Leary, M. P., Cappelleri, J. C., Crowley, A. R., Tseng, L.-J., & Collins, S. (2006). Impact of erectile dysfunction on confidence, self-esteem, and relationship satisfaction after 9 months of sildenafil citrate treatment. Journal of Urology, 176, 2132–2137.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Symonds, T., Berzon, R., Marquis, P., & Rummans, T. A. (2002). The clinical significance of quality-of-life results: Practical considerations for specific audiences. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 572–583.PubMed
10.
Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 395–407.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 371–383.PubMed
12.
13.
Hays, R. D., Farivar, S. S., & Liu, H. (2005). Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, 2, 63–67.CrossRef
14.
Cappelleri, J. C., Siegel, R. L., Osterloh, I. H., & Rosen, R. C. (2000). Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology, 56, 477–481.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Cappelleri, J. C., Rosen, R. C., Smith, M. D., Mishra, A., & Osterloh, I. H. (1999). Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology, 54, 346–351.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997). The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Sloan, J. A., Cella, D., Frost, M., Guyatt, G. H., Sprangers, M., & Symonds, T. (2002). Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: Introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 367–370.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Hays, R. D., & Woolley, J. M. (2000). The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics, 18, 419–423.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Fitzpatrick, R., Norquist, J. M., & Jenkinson, C. (2004). Distribution-based criteria for change in health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 40–44.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., et al. (2004). A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 898–910.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Cella, D., Eton, D. T., Fairclough, D. L., Bonomi, P., Heyes, A. E., Silberman, C., et al. (2002). What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 285–295.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 139–144.PubMed
23.
Coyne, K., Matza, L., Thomspon, C., Kopp, Z., & Khullar, V. (2006). Determining the importance of change in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire. Journal of Urology, 176, 627–632.PubMedCrossRef
24.
McLeod, L. D., Fehnel, S. E., Brandman, J., & Symonds, T. (2003). Evaluating minimal clinically important differences for the acne-specific quality of life questionnaire. Pharmacoeconomics, 21, 1069–1079.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Althof, S. E., Corty, E. W., Levine, S. B., Levine, F., Burnett, A. L., McVary, K., et al. (1999). EDITS: Development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology, 53, 793–799.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Clinically meaningful improvement on the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction
Auteurs
Joseph C. Cappelleri
Stanley E. Althof
Michael P. O’Leary
Sidney Glina
Rosie King
Vera J. Stecher
Martin Carlsson
Richard L. Siegel
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9232-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2007

The effects of response bias on self-reported quality of life among childhood cancer survivors

  • Original Research

Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration

  • Original Paper

Measuring quality of health care from the user’s perspective in 41 countries: psychometric properties of WHO’s questions on health systems responsiveness

  • Original Paper

Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders

  • Open Access
  • Original Paper

The association of consumer expectations, experiences and satisfaction with newly prescribed medications

  • Original Paper

How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?

  • Original Paper