Top

Gepubliceerd in:

19-12-2023 | Research

Commentary on Frank et al., (2003): where does learning through motor imagery lie on the perceptual–motor continuum?

Auteur: Robert M. Hardwick

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2024

Abstract

In this issue, Frank et al. (2023) propose that motor imagery provides a perceptual–cognitive scaffold allowing ‘perceptual’ learning to transfer into ‘motor’ learning. The present commentary explores the perspective that changes in perception itself are often critical to the development of motor skills. Motor imagery may therefore be most beneficial for developing motor skills with high perceptual demands, such as requiring rapid action selection. Potential challenges for the perceptual–cognitive scaffold approach are identified based on the possible involvement of mechanisms involved in motor learning through movement execution, and how they may be recruited through the use of motor imagery.

vorige artikel Learning via imagery – merging techniques to improve the outcomes: a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

volgende artikel Imagery practice of motor skills without conscious awareness?: a commentary to Frank et al.

Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S. P., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998). Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(2), 1117–1123.CrossRefPubMed

Frank, C., Kraeutner, S. N., Rieger, M., & Boe, S. G. (2023). Learning motor actions via imagery—perceptual or motor learning? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01787-4CrossRefPubMed

Galea, J. M., Sami, S. A., Albert, N. B., & Miall, R. C. (2010). Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements. Experimental Brain Research, 202(2), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2158-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Glover, S., & Baran, M. (2017). The motor-cognitive model of motor imagery: Evidence from timing errors in simulated reaching and grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 43(7), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000389CrossRefPubMed

Hird, J. S., Landers, D. M., Thomas, J. R., & Horan, J. J. (1991). Physical practice is superior to mental practice in enhancing cognitive and motor task performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.13.3.281CrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14(1), S103–S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832CrossRefPubMed

Krakauer, J. W., Hadjiosif, A. M., Xu, J., Wong, A. L., & Haith, A. M. (2019). Motor Learning. In R. Terjung (Ed.), Comprehensive Physiology (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphyCrossRef

Moreno-Verdú, M., Hamoline, G., Caenegem, E. E. V., Waltzing, B. M., Forest, S., Chembila-Valappil, A., et al. (2022). Guidelines for Reporting Action Simulation Studies (GRASS): proposals to improve reporting of research in Motor Imagery and Action Observation. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9vywrCrossRef

Paivio, A. (1985). Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences. Journal Canadien Des Sciences Appliquees Au Sport, 10(4), 22S-28S.PubMed

Ruffino, C., Gaveau, J., Papaxanthis, C., & Lebon, F. (2019). An acute session of motor imagery training induces use-dependent plasticity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 20002. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56628-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Simonsmeier, B. A., Andronie, M., Buecker, S., & Frank, C. (2021). The effects of imagery interventions in sports: A meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1780627CrossRef

Snoddy, G. S. (1926). Learning and stability: A psychophysiological analysis of a case of motor learning with clinical applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075814CrossRef

Spampinato, D., & Celnik, P. (2020). Multiple motor learning processes in humans: Defining their neurophysiological bases. The Neuroscientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420939552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Taylor, J. A., Krakauer, J. W., Ivry, R. B. (2014). Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(8), 3023–32. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3619-13.2014CrossRefPubMed

Van Caenegem, E. E., Hamoline, G., Waltzing, B. M., & Hardwick, R. M. (2022). Consistent under-reporting of task details in motor imagery research. Neuropsychologia, 177, 108425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108425CrossRefPubMed

Yoxon, E., Brillinger, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2022). Behavioural indexes of movement imagery ability are associated with the magnitude of corticospinal adaptation following movement imagery training. Brain Research, 1777, 147764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147764CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Commentary on Frank et al., (2003): where does learning through motor imagery lie on the perceptual–motor continuum?
Auteur: Robert M. Hardwick
Publicatiedatum: 19-12-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01910-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2024

Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022)

Research

Neuromuscular effects suggest that imagery engages motor components directly – a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Open Access
Reserach

Theoretical explanations and the availability of information for learning via combined action observation and motor imagery: a commentary on Eaves et al. (2022)

Research

Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control

Open Access
Review

Advancing mental imagery research from an interdisciplinary sport science perspective: a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Open Access
Research

Motor imagery, forward models and the cerebellum: a commentary on Rieger et al., 2023

Open Access
Research

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Commentary on Frank et al., (2003): where does learning through motor imagery lie on the perceptual–motor continuum?

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2024

Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022)

Neuromuscular effects suggest that imagery engages motor components directly – a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Theoretical explanations and the availability of information for learning via combined action observation and motor imagery: a commentary on Eaves et al. (2022)

Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control

Advancing mental imagery research from an interdisciplinary sport science perspective: a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Motor imagery, forward models and the cerebellum: a commentary on Rieger et al., 2023

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022)

Neuromuscular effects suggest that imagery engages motor components directly – a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Theoretical explanations and the availability of information for learning via combined action observation and motor imagery: a commentary on Eaves et al. (2022)

Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control

Advancing mental imagery research from an interdisciplinary sport science perspective: a commentary on Frank et al. (2023)

Motor imagery, forward models and the cerebellum: a commentary on Rieger et al., 2023