Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2008

Comparing unidimensional and multidimensional models of benefit finding in breast and prostate cancer

Auteurs: Kathryn E. Weaver, María M. Llabre, Suzanne C. Lechner, Frank Penedo, Michael H. Antoni

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2008

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Psychosocial research with cancer patients has increasingly recognized that a large proportion report at least some positive changes or aspects of personal growth that occur because of their illness—a construct referred to as benefit finding. Although theory suggests that there may be several domains to benefit finding, measurement instruments such as the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) are typically considered to be unidimensional.

Method

This study compared single and multiple factor models of the BFS using group confirmatory factor analysis in men with prostate cancer (n = 185) and women with breast cancer (n = 115) who were less than 2 years postdiagnosis.

Results

In both samples, the multiple-factor model fit the data significantly better than the single-factor model, and factor loadings were equivalent between groups. Men with prostate cancer reported greater Personal Growth benefit finding and women with breast cancer reported greater Social Relationships benefit finding. Differential relationships were observed between BFS factors and sociodemographic and disease-related variables.

Conclusion

Results suggest an alternate multidimensional framework for the BFS that may be generalizable across cancer populations. Future research should examine if BFS domains are differentially related to quality-of-life outcomes in both cancer and other medical patients.
vorige artikel Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments: an enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E)
volgende artikel Quality of life in cancer patients in South Asia: psychometric properties of the Sinhala version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses
Voetnoten
1
The estimates of the means were identical for the models with and without the group specific correlated errors.
 
Literatuur
1.
Cella, D. F., & Cherin, E. A. (1988). Quality of life during and after cancer treatment. Comprehensive Therapy, 14, 69–75.PubMed
2.
Andersen, B. L., Anderson, B., & deProsse, C. (1989). Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer; II. Psychological outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 692–697.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Jacobsen, P. B., Widows, M. R., Hann, D. M., Andrykowski, M. A., Kronish, L. E., & Fields, K. K. (1998). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 366–371.PubMed
4.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18.CrossRef
5.
Park, C. L., Cohen, L., & Murch, R. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64, 71–105.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Lechner, S. C., Zakowski, S. G., Antoni, M. H., Greenhawt, M., Block, K., & Block, P. (2003). Do sociodemographic and disease-related variables influence benefit-finding in cancer patients? Psycho-Oncology, 12, 491–499.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Bower, J. E., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., & Fahey, J. L. (1998). Cognitive processing, discovery of meaning, CD4 decline, and AIDS-related mortality among bereaved HIV-seropositive men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 979–986.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality, 64, 899–922.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Sears, S. R., Stanton, A. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2003). The yellow brick road and the emerald city: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping, and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 22, 487–497.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Sarna, L., Padilla, G., Holmes, C., Tashkin, D., Brecht, M. L., & Evangelista, L. (2002). Quality of life of long-term survivors of non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 2920–2929.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Bellizzi, K. M., Miller, M. F., Arora, N. K., & Rowland, J. H. (2007). Positive and negative life changes experienced by survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 188–199.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1986). Life transitions and crises: A conceptual overview. In R. H. Moos (Ed.), Coping with life crises: An integrated approach (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Springer.
13.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The post-traumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–471.PubMed
14.
Roesch, S. C., Rowley, A. A., & Vaughn, A. A. (2004). On the dimensionality of the stress-related growth scale: one, three, or seven factors? Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 281–290.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Updegraff, J. A., Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., & Wyatt, G. E. (2002). Positive and negative effects of HIV infection in women with low socioeconomic resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 382–394.CrossRef
16.
Siegel, K., & Schrimshaw, E. W. (2000). Perceiving benefits in adversity: Stress-related growth in women living with HIV/AIDS. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 1543–1554.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Behr, S. K., Murphy, D. L., & Summers, J. A. (1991). Kansas inventory of parental perceptions. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
18.
Urcuyo, K. R., Boyers, A. E., Carver, C. S., & Antoni, M. H. (2005). Finding benefit in breast cancer: Relations with personality, coping, and concurrent well-being. Psychology and Health, 20, 175–192.CrossRef
19.
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., & Alferi, S. M., et al. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of major depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 20, 20–32.
20.
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2004). Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer. Health Psychology, 23, 16–23.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Park, C. L. (2004). The notion of growth following stressful life experiences: Problems and prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 69–76.
22.
Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology, 11, 154–169.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Pakenham, K. I. (2005). Benefit finding in multiple sclerosis and associations with positive and negative outcomes. Health Psychology, 24, 123–132.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Kim, Y., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2007). Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 283–291.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Andrykowski, M. A., Brady, M. J., & Hunt, J. W. (1993). Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: Cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psycho-Oncology, 2, 261–276.CrossRef
26.
Bellizzi, K. M. (2004). Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58, 267–287.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Manne, S., Ostroff, J., Winkel, G., Goldstein, L., Fox, K., & Grana, G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: patient, partner, and couple perspectives. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3), 442–454.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Bellizzi, K. M., & Blank, T. O. (2006). Predicting posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 25, 47–56.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Katz, R. C., Flasher, L., Cacciapaglia, H., & Nelson, S. (2001). The psychosocial impact of cancer and lupus: A cross-validation study that extends the generality of “benefit-finding” in patients with chronic disease. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 561–571.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Cordova, M. J., Cunninghman, L. L. C., Carlson, C. R., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2001). Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study. Health Psychology, 20, 176–185.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Penedo, F. J., Molton, I., Dahn, J. R., Shen, B. J., Kinsinger, D., Traeger, L., et al. (2006). A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 261–270.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Antoni, M. H., Lechner, S. C., Kazi, A., Wimberly, S. R., Sifre, T., Urcuyo, K. R., et al. (2006). How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1143–1152.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Kinsinger, D. P., Penedo, F. J., Antoni, M. H., Dahn, J. R., Lechner, S., & Schneiderman, N. (2006). Psychosocial and sociodemographic correlates of benefit-finding in men treated for localized prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15, 954–961.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRef
35.
Thompson, M. S., & Green, S. B. (2006). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 119–169). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
36.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef
37.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
38.
Carver, C. S., & Antoni, M. H. (2004). Finding benefit in breast cancer during the year after diagnosis predicts better adjustment 5 to 8 years after diagnosis. Health Psychology, 23, 595–598.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Mohr, D. C., Dick, L. P., Russo, D., Pinn, J., Boudewyn, A. C., & Likosky, W., et al. (1999). The psychosocial impact of multiple sclerosis: Exploring the patient’s perspective. Health Psychology, 18, 376–382.
Metagegevens
Titel
Comparing unidimensional and multidimensional models of benefit finding in breast and prostate cancer
Auteurs
Kathryn E. Weaver
María M. Llabre
Suzanne C. Lechner
Frank Penedo
Michael H. Antoni
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2008
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9348-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2008

The use of focus groups in the development of the PROMIS pediatrics item bank

Quality of life in cancer patients in South Asia: psychometric properties of the Sinhala version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses

Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients: how are they related?

The scales were highly correlated: P = 0.0001

Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data

Health-related quality-of-life measures for long-term follow-up in children after major trauma

  • Open Access