Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2015

Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Auteurs: Marie-Eve Letellier, Diana Dawes, Nancy Mayo

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study were to estimate the extent to which the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 goes beyond functioning and include global feeling of well-being.

Methods

Respectively, 21 and 13 healthcare professionals agreed to link the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 to the ICF. Mappers were asked to independently identify appropriate codes for the corresponding items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 following standardized linking rules and methodology. A Delphi technique was used in order to reach consensus. The threshold of agreement was 70 %. Rounds were stopped when the threshold was obtained or when it was clear that no consensus would be reached.

Results

A total of 25 items out of 30 were endorsed for the EORTC QLQ-C30: 8 items were endorsed at the 4-digit level, 15 items at the 3-digit level, and 2 items reach the consensus that the items were not cover within the ICF. Only 2 items out of 23 did not reach consensus in the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Of the 21 items endorsed, 3 items were endorsed at the 5-digit level, 10 items at the 4-digit level, and 8 at the 3-digit level.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the content of the EORTC QLQ-C30 goes beyond functioning and includes global feeling of well-being and that the content of the EORTC QLQ-BR23 is related to functioning. Furthermore, linking items to the ICF framework could be an additional method to validate the content of health-related questionnaires.
vorige artikel Spanish translation and linguistic validation of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) measurement system
volgende artikel Cross-cultural validity of the thyroid-specific quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, ThyPRO
Literatuur
1.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. (2012). GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012.
2.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2014). World Cancer Report 2014. Chapter 1: Cancer Worldwide.
3.
World Health Organization. (2014). Fact sheet No 297.
4.
Canadian Cancer Society. (2014). Canadian Cancer Statistics. Special topic: Skin cancer. Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada, Provincial/Territorial Cancer Registries.
5.
Krotneva, S., Reidel, K., Nassif, M., Trabulsi, N., Mayo, N., Tamblyn, R., et al. (2013). Rates and predictors of consideration for adjuvant radiotherapy among high-risk breast cancer patients: A cohort study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 140, 397–405.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Ness, K. K., Wall, M. M., Oakes, J. M., Robison, L. L., & Gurney, J. G. (2006). Physical performance limitations and participation restrictions among cancer survivors: A population-based study. Annals of Epidemiology, 16, 197–205.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Mejdahl, M. K., Andersen, K. G., Gärtner, R., Kroman, N., Kehlet, H. (2013). Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: Six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ: British Medical Journal 346, f1865. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​f1865.
8.
Cormier, J. N., Askew, R. L., Mungovan, K. S., Xing, Y., Ross, M. I., & Armer, J. M. (2010). Lymphedema beyond breast cancer. Cancer, 116, 5138–5149.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Levangie, P. K., & Drouin, J. (2009). Magnitude of late effects of breast cancer treatments on shoulder function: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 116, 1–15.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada, Public Health Agency of Canada, Provincial/Territorial Cancer Registries. (2013). Canadian Cancer Statistics 2013. Special topic: Liver cancer.
11.
Dawes, D. J., Meterissian, S., Golberg, M., & Mayo, N. E. (2008). Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 651–658.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Brach, M., Cieza, A., Stucki, G., Füssl, M., Cole, A., Ellerin, B. E., et al. (2004). ICF Core Sets for breast cancer. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 121–127.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Brockow, T., Duddeck, K., Geyh, S., Scharzkopf, S. R., Weigl, M., Franke, T., et al. (2004). Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on breast cancer using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Suppl. 44, 43–48.CrossRef
14.
Alfano, C. M., Smith, A. W., Irwin, M. L., Bowen, D. J., Sorensen, B., Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). Physical activity, long-term symptoms, and physical health-related quality of life among breast cancer survivors: A prospective analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 1, 116–128.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Gilchrist, L. S., Galantino, M., Wampler, M., Marchese, V. G., Morris, G. S., & Ness, K. K. (2009). A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 89, 286–306.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
Schmitz, K. H., Speck, R. M., Rye, S. A., DiSipio, T., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). Prevalence of breast cancer treatment sequelae over 6 years of follow-up. Cancer, 118, 2217–2225.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Weissleder, H., Schuchhardt, C. (2007). Lymphedema—Diagnosis and therapy. Viavital Verlag GmbH, Belfortstr, Koeln.
18.
Flanagan, J. C. (1982). Measurement of quality of life: Current state of the art. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 56–59.PubMed
19.
World Health Organization. (1998). Whoqol user manual: Programme on mental health. World Health Organization.
20.
Petersen, L. R., Clark, M. M., Novotny, P., Kung, S., Sloan, J. A., Patten, C. A., et al. (2008). Relationship of optimism-pessimism and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Psychological Oncology, 26, 15–32.CrossRef
21.
Schwartz, A. N. (1975). An observation on self-esteem as the linchpin of quality of life for the aged. An Essay. Gerontologist, 15, 470–472.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Montazeri, A. (2008). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, 27, 1–31.CrossRef
23.
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in International clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376.CrossRef
24.
Sprangers, M. A. G., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer—specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 14, 2756–2768.PubMed
25.
Mayo, N. E., Moriello, C., Asano, M., van der Spuy, S., & Finch, L. (2011). The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices captures constructs beyond symptoms and function. Quality of Life Research, 20, 621–627.CrossRefPubMed
26.
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 26-2-2013. Ref Type: Online Source.
27.
American Physical Therapy Association. (2008). APTA Endorses World Health Organization ICF Moel.
28.
Stucki, G. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. American Journal pf Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 733–740.CrossRef
29.
World Health Organization. (2008). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization.
30.
Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life—A conceptual model of patients outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 59–65.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2008). Patient reported outcome measures: A model-based classification system or research and clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 17, 1125–1135.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ferrans, C. E. (2007). Differences in what quality-of-life instruments measure. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 37, 22–26.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Moriello, C., Byrne, K., Cieza, A., Nash, C., Stolee, P., & Mayo, N. E. (2008). Mapping the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 102–106.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 205–210.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Üstün, B., & Stucki, G. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 212–218.CrossRefPubMed
36.
De Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
37.
Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Kollerits, B., Grimby, G., & Stucki, G. (2007). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16, 833–851.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Fekete, C., Boldt, C., Post, M., Eriks-Hoogland, I., Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2011). How to measure what matters: Development and application of guiding principles to select measurement instruments in an epidemiologic study on functioning. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, S29–S38.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Mols, F., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Coebergh, J. W., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2005). Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer, 41, 2613–2619.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Ryan, J. L., Carroll, J. K., Ryan, E. P., Mustian, K. M., Fiscella, K., & Morrow, G. R. (2007). Mechanisms of cancer-related fatigue. The Oncologist, 12, 22–34.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Lee, V., Robin Cohen, S., Edgar, L., Laizner, A. M., & Gagnon, A. J. (2006). Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 3133–3145.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Lee, V. (2008). The existential plight of cancer: meaning making as a concrete approach to the intangible search for meaning. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16, 779–785.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Paskett, E. D., Naughton, M. J., McCoy, T. P., Case, L. D., & Abbott, J. M. (2007). The epidemiology of arm and hand swelling in premenopausal breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 16, 775–782.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Tsai, R. J., Dennis, L. K., Lynch, C. F., Snetselaar, L. G., Zamba, G. K., & Scott-Conner, C. (2009). The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of treatment factors. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 16, 1959–1972.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Cheville, A. L., McGarvey, C. L., Petrek, J. A., Russo, S. A., Taylor, M. E., & Thiadens, S. R. J. (2003). Lymphedema management. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 13, 290–301.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Glaessel, A., Kirchberger, I., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2011). Does the Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Breast Cancer capture the problems in functioning treated by physiotherapists in women with breast cancer? Physiotherapy, 97, 33–46.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Auteurs
Marie-Eve Letellier
Diana Dawes
Nancy Mayo
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0791-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Cross-cultural validity of the thyroid-specific quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, ThyPRO

Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providers

Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores

Mapping FACT-P to EQ-5D in a large cross-sectional study of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

  • Open Access

Contribution of symptom clusters to multiple sclerosis consequences

Response shift in the presence of missing data

  • Commentary