Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-10-2007 | Original Paper

Controlling for occasion-specific effects when assessing the test–retest reliability of self-report health questionnaires

Auteurs: Joseph A. Olsen, Daniel A. Bloch, George J. Bloch

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objective

This study proposes a method for self-report health questionnaires to adjust test–retest reliability for changes during the test–retest interval based on an external measure, and to distinguish such changes from random response errors.

Methods

In our application, eighty participants completed the Symptoms of Illness Checklist (SIC) on two occasions, two weeks apart, immediately before interviews given on each occasion by one of two physicians in a crossover design. The physician interview scores served as external measures, and structural equation modeling was used to estimate the parameters of a model that corrected for the occasion-specific effect of participants’ responses using information from the interviews.

Results

Correcting for changes in symptoms during the test–retest interval increased SIC test–retest reliability from .744 to .804 and significantly improved model fit (χ2 diff (1) = 30.78, p < .001).

Conclusions

The results suggest methods that can improve the evaluation of self-report health questionnaire test–retest reliability by identifying changes using an external measure, and distinguishing these from random response errors; these increased the estimated SIC test–retest reliability and indicated that the SIC was indeed able to measure changes over the studied time interval. This method can be applied across a broad range of questionnaires.
vorige artikel The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke
volgende artikel Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
AMOS allows the model to be specified graphically in the form of a path diagram—in the present case the illustration presented in Fig. 1, but without the triangle and the lines emanating from it (these intercepts are estimated by default in AMOS). If the reader wishes to obtain a copy of the AMOS program file used in the present study, please contact Joseph Olsen at joseph_olsen@byu.edu.
 
Literatuur
1.
Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Ilies, R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8, 206–224.CrossRef
2.
Laenen, A., Vangeneugden, T., Geys, H., & Molenberghs, G. (2006). Generalized reliability estimation using repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 113–131.CrossRef
3.
Schuck, P. (2004). Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: Which coefficient should be used? Quality of Life Research, 13, 571–586.CrossRef
4.
Becker, G. (2000). How important is transient error in estimating reliability? Going beyond simulation studies. Psychological Methods, 5, 370–379.CrossRef
5.
Green, S. B. (2003). A coefficient Alpha for test–retest data. Psychological Methods, 8, 88–101.CrossRef
6.
Vautier, S., & Jmel, S. (2003). Transient error or specificity? An alternative to the staggered equivalent split-half procedure. Psychological Methods, 8, 225–238.CrossRef
7.
Raykov, T., & Penev S. (2005). Estimating the reliability for multiple component measuring instruments in test–retest designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58, 285–299.CrossRef
8.
Sturman, M. C., Cheramie, R. A., & Cashen, L. H. (2005). The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test–retest reliability of employee job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 269–283.CrossRef
9.
Watson, D. (2004). Stability versus change, dependability versus error: Issues in the assessment of personality over time. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 319–350.CrossRef
10.
Stowell, J. R., & Bloch, G. J. (2002, April). The symptoms of illness checklist (SIC): A relation between health and stress. (Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Abstract 180.).
11.
Stowell, J. R., Hedges, D. W., Ghambaryan. A., Key, C., & Bloch, G. J. (Submitted, 2007). Validation of the Symptoms of Illness Checklist (SIC) as a tool for health psychology research. Journal of Health Psychology.
12.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
13.
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford Press.
14.
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 365–376.CrossRef
15.
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Controlling for occasion-specific effects when assessing the test–retest reliability of self-report health questionnaires
Auteurs
Joseph A. Olsen
Daniel A. Bloch
George J. Bloch
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9246-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2007

Feasibility, validity and reliability of the Welsh version of the EQ-5D health status questionnaire

  • Brief Communication

Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints

  • Open Access

Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect

  • Brief Communication

Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups

  • Open Access

Responsiveness to change due to supportive-expressive group therapy, improvement in mood and disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer

  • Erratum

The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries

  • Original Paper