Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

09-09-2022 | Correction

Correction to: Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality

Auteurs: Jonathan B. Banks, Matthew S. Welhaf

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Extract

In the article, there was an error in the values reported in Table 2. A correction to Table 2 has been made to several reported values in which the decimal was improperly aligned changing the interpretation of the correlation.
Table 2
Correlations among all measures
Variable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1. WM
–
                             
2. Attention Control
0.91
–
                           
3. SYMSPAN
0.60
0.40
–
                         
4. RSPAN
0.64
0.47
0.40
–
                       
5. Counters
0.81
0.65
0.36
0.33
–
                     
6. ANTI-Aro
0.73
0.89
0.25
0.31
0.46
–
                   
7. ANTI-Let
0.74
0.89
0.28
0.34
0.50
0.68
–
                 
8. SART-d’
0.52
0.52
0.16
0.36
0.43
0.35
0.36
–
               
9. SART-RTSD
− 0.49
− 0.52
− 0.21
− 0.20
− 0.39
− 0.40
− 0.34
− 0.62
–
             
10. TUT
− 0.30
− 0.37
− 0.06
− 0.02
− 0.26
− 0.32
− 0.28
− 0.46
0.53
–
           
11. Neu TUT
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.18
− 0.02
0.01
0.10
0.05
0.07
0.38
–
         
12. Pos TUT
− 0.29
− 0.33
− 0.16
− 0.13
− 0.17
− 0.30
− 0.27
− 0.24
0.30
0.31
− 0.13
–
       
13. Neg TUT
− 0.24
− 0.28
− 0.02
− 0.11
− 0.18
− 0.18
− 0.25
− 0.42
0.37
0.61
− 0.36
− 0.08
–
     
14. Intent TUT
− 0.25
− 0.26
− 0.02
− 0.14
− 0.22
− 0.20
− 0.17
− 0.39
0.37
0.57
0.19
0.06
0.42
–
   
15. UnIntent TUT
− 0.07
− 0.13
− 0.04
0.13
− 0.06
− 0.12
− 0.13
− 0.10
0.20
0.51
0.21
0.28
0.23
− 0.42
–
 
16. PANAS Pos
0.06
0.09
− 0.02
0.01
0.03
0.16
0.03
− 0.02
− 0.03
− 0.12
− 0.07
0.01
− 0.07
0.05
− 0.18
–
17. PANAS Neg
− 0.20
− 0.22
− 0.05
− 0.15
− 0.13
− 0.20
− 0.19
− 0.10
0.11
0.22
− 0.17
− 0.02
0.40
0.09
0.15
0.06
18. FFMQ Observe
− 0.01
0.06
0.02
0.03
− 0.12
0.06
0.08
0.05
− 0.05
0.03
− 0.04
− 0.06
0.10
0.06
− 0.02
0.21
19. FFMQ Describe
0.00
− 0.00
0.01
0.07
− 0.04
0.00
− 0.01
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.06
− 0.08
0.05
− 0.01
0.30
20. FFMQ Act
0.08
0.11
0.08
− 0.02
0.00
0.08
0.16
− 0.01
− 0.00
− 0.11
0.01
0.08
− 0.17
− 0.05
− 0.07
0.25
21. FFMQ No Judge
0.10
0.14
− 0.03
0.01
0.06
0.14
0.14
0.05
− 0.01
− 0.08
0.02
− 0.01
− 0.10
0.09
− 0.19
0.08
22. FFMQ No React
0.13
0.20
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.20
0.19
0.06
− 0.12
− 0.08
0.06
− 0.01
− 0.12
− 0.13
0.06
0.17
23. RSS
− 0.05
− 0.08
− 0.02
0.03
− 0.04
− 0.07
− 0.09
− 0.05
0.04
0.11
− 0.11
− 0.07
0.24
0.04
0.08
− 0.07
24. MWQ
− 0.09
− 0.08
− 0.14
− 0.02
− 0.02
− 0.08
− 0.09
− 0.00
− 0.09
0.04
− 0.07
0.02
0.09
− 0.01
0.06
− 0.13
Variable
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1. WM
               
2. Attention Control
               
3. SYMSPAN
               
4. RSPAN
               
5. Counters
               
6. ANTI-Aro
               
7. ANTI-Let
               
8. SART-d’
               
9. SART-RTSD
               
10. TUT
               
11. Neu TUT
               
12. Pos TUT
               
13. Neg TUT
               
14. Intent TUT
               
15. UnIntent TUT
               
16. PANAS Pos
               
17. PANAS Neg
–
             
18. FFMQ Observe
0.11
–
           
19. FFMQ Describe
− 0.28
0.35
–
         
20. FFMQ Act
− 0.30
− 0.02
0.35
–
       
21. FFMQ No Judge
− 0.29
− 0.10
0.22
0.49
–
     
22. FFMQ No React
− 0.24
0.08
0.25
0.13
0.06
–
   
23. RSS
0.42
0.24
− 0.21
− 0.35
− 0.45
− 0.25
–
 
24. MWQ
0.16
0.06
− 0.18
− 0.68
− 0.30
− 0.06
0.24
–
Correlations above |.14| are significant at p < .05
WM working memory factor score, Attention Control attention control factor score, SYMSPAN Symmetry Span score, RSPAN Reading Span score, Counters Counters working memory task score, ANTI-Aro Antisaccade Arrows, ANTI-Let Antisaccade Letters, SART-d’ Sustained Attention to Response Task d’ score, SART-RTSD Sustained Attention to Response Task reaction time standard deviation, TUT Task Unrelated Thought, Neu neutral, Pos positive, Neg negative, Intent intentional, UnIntent unintentional, PANAS Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, FFMQ Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, RSS Ruminative Responses Scale, MWQ Mind Wandering Questionnaire
…
vorige artikel Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task
Metagegevens
Titel
Correction to: Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality
Auteurs
Jonathan B. Banks
Matthew S. Welhaf
Publicatiedatum
09-09-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01730-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2023

Sourness impacts envy and jealousy in Chinese culture

  • Original Article

Embodiment and repeated exposure do not suffice for abstract concepts acquisition: evidence from tonal music cognition

  • Original Article

Similar proactive effect monitoring in free and forced choice action modes

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Effects of working memory training on cognitive and academic abilities in typically developing school-age children

  • Original Article

Length is not all that matters: testing the role of number identity and the ratio of fillers in comparisons of multi-digits with different digit length

  • Open Access
  • Original Article