Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2010 | Original Article

Corresponding delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory

Auteurs: John Lipinski, John P. Spencer, Larissa K. Samuelson

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The present study addresses the relationship between linguistic and non-linguistic spatial representations. In three experiments we probe spatial language and spatial memory at the same time points in the task sequence. Experiments 1 and 2 show analogous delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory. Experiment 3 extends this correspondence, showing that additional perceptual structure along the vertical axis reduces delay-dependent effects in both tasks. These results indicate that linguistic and non-linguistic spatial systems depend on shared underlying representational processes. In addition, we also address how these delay-dependent biases can arise within a single theoretical framework without positing differing prototypes for linguistic and non-linguistic spatial systems.
vorige artikel Is there a structural limit to ‘branch’ recursively between more than two tasks?
volgende artikel RT patterns and chunks in SRT tasks: a reply to Jiménez (2008)
Literatuur
Amari, S. (1977). Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27, 77–87.CrossRefPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 126–145.CrossRef
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brungart, D. S., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Durlach, N. I. (2000). Evaluation of response methods for the localization of nearby objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(1), 48–65.PubMed
Crawford, L. E., Regier, T., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization. Cognition, 75(3), 209–235.CrossRefPubMed
Erlhagen, W., & Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review, 109, 545–572.CrossRefPubMed
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.PubMed
Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition, 55, 39–84.CrossRefPubMed
Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208–217.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., & Prohaska, V. (1988). Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: estimating the dates of events. Psychological Review, 95, 471–484.CrossRef
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.CrossRefPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220–241.CrossRef
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97.CrossRefPubMed
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. N. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.CrossRefPubMed
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 359–368.CrossRef
Lipinski, J., Spencer J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009a). It’s in the eye of the beholder: Spatial language and spatial memory use the same perceptual reference frames. In L. B. Smith, M. Gasser & K. Mix (Eds.), The spatial foundations of language. Oxford University Press (in press).
Lipinski, J., Spencer, J. P., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009b). Towards the integration of linguistic and non-linguistic spatial cognition: a dynamic field theory approach. In J. Mayor, N. Ruh, & K. Plunkett (Eds.), Progress in neural processing 18. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, Oxford, UK (pp. 205–216). Singapore: World Scientific.
Logan, G. D., & Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (Language, Speech, and Communication) (pp. 493–529). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Munnich, E., Landau, B., & Dosher, B. (2001). Spatial language and spatial representation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81, 171–207.CrossRefPubMed
Palmer, S. E., & Hemenway, K. (1978). Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 691–702.CrossRefPubMed
Schöner, G. (2008). Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 101–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds’ delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377–404.CrossRefPubMed
Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009a). Filling the gap on developmental change: Tests of a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition (submitted).
Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009b). Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: Capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (in press).
Schutte, A. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory: Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74(5), 1393–1417.CrossRefPubMed
Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 33, 871–894.
Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2008). Generality with specificity: The dynamic field theory genearlizes across tasks and time scales. Developmental Science, 11, 541–555.CrossRefPubMed
Simmering, V. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2009). Creating and destroying reference frames in spatial working memory (in preparation).
Simmering, V. S., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2006). Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 1027–1046.PubMed
Simmering, V. S., Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2008). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. Brain Research, 1202, 68–86.CrossRefPubMed
Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16–37.CrossRef
Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2003). Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cognitive Psychology, 47(4), 432–480.CrossRefPubMed
Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. S., Schutte, A. R., & Schöner, G. (2007). What does theoretical neuroscience have to offer the study of behavioral development? Insights from a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), Emerging landscapes of mind: Mapping the nature of change in spatial cognition (pp. 320–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Zee, E., & Slack, J. (Eds.). (2003). Representing direction in language and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12, 1–12.CrossRefPubMed
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Corresponding delay-dependent biases in spatial language and spatial memory
Auteurs
John Lipinski
John P. Spencer
Larissa K. Samuelson
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2010
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0255-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2010

Is there a structural limit to ‘branch’ recursively between more than two tasks?

  • Original Article

Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice

  • Original Article

Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance

  • Original Article

Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting

  • Original Article

Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location

  • Original Article

RT patterns and chunks in SRT tasks: a reply to Jiménez (2008)

  • Original Article