Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Gepubliceerd in:

17-07-2015 | Original Article

Cross-cultural Measurement Equivalence of the KINDL Questionnaire for Quality of Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents

Auteurs: Peyman Jafari, Dejan Stevanovic, Zahra Bagheri

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 2/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

This cross-cultural study aimed to assess whether Iranian and Serbian children, and also their parents, perceived the meaning of the items in the KINDL quality of life questionnaire consistently. The sample included 1086 Iranian and 756 Serbian children and adolescents, alongside 1061 and 618 of their parents, respectively. The ordinal logistic regression was used to assess differential item functioning (DIF) of the self and proxy-reports of the two versions of the KINDL, including Kid-KINDL and Kiddo-KINDL, across Iranian and Serbian samples. Statistically significant DIF was flagged for 14 out of 24 (58 %) and 20 out of 24 (83 %) items in the self-report of the Kid-KINDL and Kiddo-KINDL, respectively. Moreover, 20 out of 24 (83 %) in the proxy reports of the both Kid-KINDL and Kiddo-KINDL, showed DIF across two samples. Accordingly, considerable caution is warranted when using the KINDL for cross-cultural comparisons.
vorige artikel Obsessive–Compulsive Personality Traits in Youth with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder
volgende artikel Positively Biased Self-Perceptions: Who Has Them and What are Their Effects?
Literatuur
1.
Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, Leidy NK, Marquis P, Revicki D et al (2003) Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration. Value Health 6:522–531CrossRefPubMed
2.
Fayed N, de Camargo OK, Kerr E, Rosenbaum P, Dubey A, Bostan C et al (2012) Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: a review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Dev Med Child Neurol 54:1085–1095CrossRefPubMed
3.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191CrossRefPubMed
4.
Schmidt S, Bullinger M (2003) Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:S29–S34CrossRefPubMed
5.
Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A (2000) Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med Care 38:II102–II124CrossRefPubMed
6.
Sartorius N, Kuyken W (1994) Translation of health status instruments. In: Orley J, Kuyken W (eds) Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
7.
Regnault A, Herdman M (2015) Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments. Qual Life Res 24:115–124CrossRefPubMed
8.
Ho SM, Rochelle TL, Law LS, Duan W, Bai Y, Shih SM et al (2014) Methodological issues in positive psychology research with diverse populations: exploring strengths among Chinese adults. In: Pedrotti JT, Edwards LM (eds) Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism and positive psychology. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht
9.
Teresi JA, Fleishman JA (2007) Differential item functioning and health assessment. Qual Life Res 1:33–42CrossRef
10.
Byrne BM, Watkins D (2003) The issue of measurement invariance revisited. J Cross Cult Psychol 34:155–175CrossRef
11.
Limbers CA, Newman DA, Varni JW (2009) Factorial invariance of child self-report across race/ethnicity groups: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Ann Epidemiol 19:575–581CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Auquier P, Erhart M, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Bruil J et al (2007) The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Qual Life Res 16:1347–1356CrossRefPubMed
13.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Power M et al (2008) The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value Health 11:645–658CrossRefPubMed
14.
Robitail S, Ravens-Sieberer U, Simeoni MC, Rajmil L, Bruil J, Power M et al (2007) Testing the structural and cross-cultural validity of the KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res 16:1335–1345CrossRefPubMed
15.
Stevanovic D, Jafari P (2015) A cross-cultural study to assess measurement invariance of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire across Serbian and Iranian children and adolescents. Qual Life Res 24:223–230CrossRefPubMed
16.
Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D (2003) The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr 3:329–341CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M (1998) Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Qual Life Res 7:399–407CrossRefPubMed
18.
Eser E, Yuksel H, Baydur H, Erhart M, Saatli G, Cengiz Ozyurt B et al (2008) The psychometric properties of the new Turkish generic health-related quality of life questionnaire for children (Kid-KINDL). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 19:409–417PubMed
19.
Fernandez-Lopez JA, Fernandez Fidalgo M, Cieza A, Ravens-Sieberer U (2004) Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: preliminary validation and reliability of the Spanish version of the KINDL questionnaire. Aten Primaria 33:434–442CrossRefPubMed
20.
Helseth S, Lund T (2005) Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL. Scand J Caring Sci 19:102–109CrossRefPubMed
21.
Jafari P, Sharafi Z, Bagheri Z, Shalileh S (2014) Measurement equivalence of the KINDL questionnaire across child self-reports and parent proxy-reports: a comparison between item response theory and ordinal logistic regression. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 45:369–376CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lee PH, Chang LI, Ravens-Sieberer U (2008) Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-kINDL generic children’s health-related quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 17:603–611CrossRefPubMed
23.
Stevanovic D (2009) Serbian KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessments in healthy children and adolescents: reproducibility and construct validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:79CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Stevanovic D, Lakic A, Vilotic J (2009) The psychometric study of the Serbian KINDL questionnaire for health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents. Scand J Caring Sci 23:361–368CrossRefPubMed
25.
Yamaguchi N, Poudel KC, Poudel-Tandukar K, Shakya D, Ravens-Sieberer U, Jimba M (2010) Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kiddo-KINDL in adolescents. Biosci Trends 4:178–185PubMed
26.
Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Ocepek-Welikson K, Cook K, Cella D, Narasimhalu K et al (2007) A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Qual Life Res 16(Suppl 1):69–84CrossRefPubMed
27.
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M (2010) Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:81PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Crane PK, Hart DL, Gibbons LE, Cook KF (2006) A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 59:478–484CrossRefPubMed
29.
Huang IC, Leite WL, Shearer P, Seid M, Revicki DA, Shenkman EA (2011) Differential item functioning in quality of life measure between children with and without special health-care needs. Value Health 14:872–883CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432CrossRefPubMed
31.
Schalock RL, Verdugo MA, Jenaro C, Wang M, Wehmeyer M, Jiancheng X et al (2005) Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. Am J Ment Retard 110:298–311CrossRefPubMed
32.
Wyse AE (2013) DIF cancellation in the Rasch Model. J Appl Meas 14:118–128PubMed
33.
Kim SY, Nair R, Knight GP, Roosa MW, Updegraff KA (2008) Measurement equivalence of neighborhood quality measures for European American and Mexican American Families. J Community Psychol 37:1–20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Kim ES, Yoon M (2011) Testing measurement invariance: a comparison of multiple-group categorical CFA and IRT. Struct Equ Modeling 18:212–228CrossRef
35.
Lalwani AK, Shavitt S, Johnson T (2006) What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding? J Pers Soc Psychol 90:165–178CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Roessner V, Becker A, Rothenberger A, Rohde LA, Banaschewski T (2007) A cross-cultural comparison between samples of Brazilian and German children with ADHD/HD using the Child Behavior Checklist. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 257:352–359CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Cross-cultural Measurement Equivalence of the KINDL Questionnaire for Quality of Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents
Auteurs
Peyman Jafari
Dejan Stevanovic
Zahra Bagheri
Publicatiedatum
17-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-015-0568-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2016

Adverse Prenatal, Perinatal and Neonatal Experiences in Children with Anxiety Disorders

  • Original Article

Inhibitory Control in Pediatric Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Disorder): The Importance of Controlling for Age and Symptoms of Inattention and Hyperactivity

  • Original Article

Positively Biased Self-Perceptions: Who Has Them and What are Their Effects?

  • Original Article

School-Based Interventions for Anxious Children: Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Original Article

Callous–Unemotional Traits as Markers for Conduct Problem Severity in Early Childhood: A Meta-analysis

  • Substantive/Theoretical Review

Sleep Disturbances and Associated Factors in Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Retrospective and Cross-Sectional Study

  • Original Article