Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Gepubliceerd in:

24-08-2020

Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse U.S. Sample

Auteurs: Emily Graybill, Andrew Roach, Brian Barger

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 2/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used mental health screening instrument developed in the United Kingdom that measures five proposed factors. U.S. research, however, historically supports a slightly different three-factor solution. The present study reports results using both principal factor analysis (PFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from multiple waves of an ongoing mental health project in middle school aged children. PFA analyses suggested three, five and six-factor solutions with substantial cross-loadings from items. CFAs showed alternative five and six-factor solutions fit well when items guided by the initial PFA were allowed to cross-load. Neither the original five-factor nor popular three-factor models fit well without allowing cross-loading items. These data suggest that popular SDQ three and five-factor model may have variable fit in certain U.S. populations.
vorige artikel Evidence for a Higher-Order ESEM Structure of ADHD in a Sample of Chinese Children
volgende artikel Latent Profile Analysis of Traditional and Cyber-Aggression and Victimization: Associations with Dark Triad Traits and Psychopathology Symptoms
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1–13.
Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(2), ii17–ii24.
Becker, A., Steinhausen, H., Baldursson, G., Dalsgaard, S., Lorenzo, M., Ralston, S., Döpfner, M., Rothenberger, A., & Group, A. (2006). Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(Suppl.1), i56–i62s.PubMedCrossRef
Caci, H., Morin, A. J., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(10), 1291–1301.CrossRef
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.CrossRef
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1998). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6(1), 93–110.CrossRef
Collett, B. R., Ohan, J. L., & Myers, K. M. (2003). Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: Scales assessing externalizing behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(10), 1143–1170.CrossRef
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7-15
Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A., & Hawes, D. (2005). Disentangling the underlying dimensions of psychopathy and conduct problems in childhood: A community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 400–410.PubMedCrossRef
Dickey, W. C., & Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(9), 1159–1167.PubMedCrossRef
Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self-report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1.CrossRef
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.CrossRef
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.PubMedCrossRef
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345.
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 534–539.PubMedCrossRef
Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 17–24.
He, J. P., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): The factor structure and scale validation in US adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(4), 583–595.PubMedCrossRef
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.CrossRef
Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153–166.CrossRef
Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683.CrossRef
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr., J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23.PubMedCrossRef
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The applications of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.CrossRef
Li, C. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949.CrossRef
Liu, S.-K., Chien, Y.-L., Shang, C.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Liu, Y.-C., & Gau, S. S.-F. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(6), 720–730s.PubMedCrossRef
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, Don'ts, and how-To's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.CrossRef
Mieloo, C. L., Bevaart, F., Donker, M. C., van Oort, F. V., Raat, H., & Jansen, W. (2014). Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. European Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 26–32.PubMedCrossRef
Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). TComplex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological methodology, 267–316.
Niclasen, J., Teasdale, T. W., Andersen, A. M. N., Skovgaard, A. M., Elberling, H., & Obel, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Danish strength and difficulties questionnaire: The SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts. PLoS One, 7(2), e32025.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595.CrossRef
Paalman, C. H., Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., & Jansen, L. M. (2013). Instruments measuring externalizing mental health problems in immigrant ethnic minority youths: A systematic review of measurement properties. PLoS One, 8(5), e63109.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Palmieri, P. A., & Smith, G. C. (2007). Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a U.S. sample of custodial grandmothers. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 189–198.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Perera, S., Thalagala, E., Chandrarathna, S. H., Agampodi, T. C., Nugegoda, D. B., & Agampodi, S. B. (2013). Factor structure and normative data of the Sinhalese version of self-reported strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for adolescents. Ceylon Medical Journal,of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 634–659.
Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287.PubMedCrossRef
Richter, J., Sagatun, A., Heyerdahl, S., Oppedal, B., & Rotsamb, E. (2011). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - self report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(9), 1002–1011.PubMedCrossRef
Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., ... & Rosseel, M. Y. (2017). Package ‘lavaan’. Retrieved June, 17, 2017.
Rothenberger, A., Becker, A., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Group Bs. (2008). Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: Results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(Suppl.1), 99–105.PubMedCrossRef
Ruchkin, V., Jones, S., Vermeiren, R., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2008). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: The self-report version in American urban and suburban youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 175–182.PubMedCrossRef
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.CrossRef
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(3), 254–274.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tobia, V., Grabriele, M. A., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2013). The Italian version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - teacher. Psychometric properties. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(5), 493–505.CrossRef
Toh, T. H., Chow, S. J., Ting, T. H., & Sewell, J. (2008). Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1.CrossRef
Tuszynski, J., & Tuszynski, M. J. (2007). The caTools package. R package version, 1–8.
van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goedhart, A. W., de Wilde, E. J., & Treffers, P. D. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: How important are method effects and minor factors? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 127–144.CrossRef
Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 189–197.CrossRef
Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M., & Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early-, and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(12), 1304–1312.PubMedCrossRef
Vugteveen, J., De Bildt, A., Hartman, C. A., & Timmerman, M. E. (2018). Using the Dutch multi-informant strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to predict adolescent psychiatric diagnoses. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(10), 1347–1359.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse U.S. Sample
Auteurs
Emily Graybill
Andrew Roach
Brian Barger
Publicatiedatum
24-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09833-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2021

Investigating Relationships Among Distress Tolerance, PTSD Symptom Severity, and Alcohol Use

Evaluation of the Self-Report Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in a Sample of Urban Middle School Students: a Multidimensional Rasch Analysis

Why Change Now? Cognitive Reappraisal Moderates the Relation between Anxiety and Resistance to Sunk Cost

Latent Profile Analysis of Traditional and Cyber-Aggression and Victimization: Associations with Dark Triad Traits and Psychopathology Symptoms

Computer-Based Testing to Shorten the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ): a Proof- of-Principle Study of the Lifetime and Current Forms

The Relationship Between Hostile Interpretation Bias and Symptoms of Depression and Social Anxiety: a Replication Across Two Samples