Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2010 | Editor’s page

Invasive treatment of ACS: early or later on?

Auteur: E. E. van der Wall

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 3/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Extract

In a recent online publication in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30 December 2009, Damman from the group of de Winter (AMC, Amsterdam) published the five-year clinical outcome in the Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS)1 trial. The ICTUS trial randomised 1200 patients to either an early invasive strategy or a selective invasive treatment strategy. Outcomes included a composite of death and myocardial infarction. The main findings of the recent study were that an early invasive strategy for managing patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) was not better in the long run at preventing death or myocardial infarction than a more conservative approach. At five years, there was no significant benefit from coronary angiography with revascularisation within 48 hours when the groups were stratified by risk. These five-year data are consistent with earlier data reported from the ICTUS trial, which showed no benefits of early invasive management after one and three years of follow-up (de Winter et al, NEJM 2005; Hirsch et al, Lancet 2007). The present analysis therefore extends previous reports that, in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS and an elevated troponin T, an early invasive strategy is superior to a selective invasive strategy in reducing five-year death or myocardial infarction. Over five years, the revascularisation rates were 81% in the early invasive group and 60% in the selective invasive group. All-cause mortality was not significantly different between the early invasive and selective invasive groups (11.1 and 9.9%, respectively). Cumulative death or myocardial infarction rates were 22.3 and 18.1%, respectively, but the difference was again not significant. This (non-significant) increase in the early invasive group was primarily driven by an early increase in procedure-related myocardial infarctions and a trend toward higher late non-cardiovascular mortality. However, the early increase was not associated with increased cardiovascular mortality or myocardial infarctions during follow-up. …
Voetnoten
1
The ICTUS trial was supported by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (ICIN), the Working Group on Cardiovascular Research of the Netherlands (WCN), and educational grants form Eli Lilly, Sanofi/Synthelabo, Sanofi-Aventis, Medtronic, and Roche Diagnostics.
 
Metagegevens
Titel
Invasive treatment of ACS: early or later on?
Auteur
E. E. van der Wall
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2010
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091747