Abstract
A common hypothesis is that the switch cost measured when switching between prosaccades and antisaccades mainly reflects the inhibition of the saccadic system after the execution of an antisaccade, which requires the inhibition of a gaze response. The present study further tested this hypothesis by comparing switch performance between peripherally triggered saccades and centrally triggered saccades with the latter type of saccades not requiring inhibition of a gaze response. For peripherally triggered saccades, a switch cost was present for prosaccades but not for antisaccades. For centrally triggered saccades, a switch cost was present both for prosaccades and for antisaccades. The difference between both saccade tasks further supports the hypothesis that the switch performance observed for peripherally triggered saccades is related to the inhibition of a gaze response that is required when executing a peripherally triggered antisaccade and the persisting inhibition in the saccadic system this entails. Furthermore, the switch costs observed for centrally triggered saccades indicate that more general processes besides the persisting inhibition in the saccadic system, such as reconfiguration and interference control, also contribute to the switch performance in saccades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport DA, Styles EA, Hseih S (1994) Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance XV: conscious and non-conscious information processing. 35–71
Barton JS, Greenzang C, Hefter R, Edelman J, Manoach DS (2006) Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Exp Brain Res 168:76–87
Cherkasova MV, Manoach DS, Intriligator JM, Barton JS (2002) Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing. Exp Brain Res 144:528–537
Dorris MC, Paré M, Munoz DP (2000) Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance. J Neurosci 20:RC52(1–5)
Everling S, Munoz DP (2000) Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. J Neurosci 20:387–400
Everling S, Dorris MC, Klein RM, Munoz DP (1999) Role of primate superior colliculus in preparation and execution of anti-saccades and pro-saccades. J Neurosci 19:2740–2754
Fecteau JH, Au C, Armstrong IT, Munoz DP (2004) Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 159:84–91
Forbes K, Klein RM (1996) The magnitude of the fixation offset effect with endogeneously and exogenously controlled saccades. J Cogn Neurosci 8(4):344–352
Guitton D, Buchtel HA, Douglas RM (1985) Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal directed saccades. Exp Brain Res 58:455–472
Hallet PE (1978) Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res 18:1279–1296
Hallet PE, Adams BD (1980) The predictability of saccade latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vision Res 20:329–339
Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91(3):295–327
Logan GD, Irwin DE (2000) Don’t look! Don’t touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychon Bull Rev 7:107–112
Manoach DS, Lindgren KA, Cherkasova MV, Goff DC, Halpern EF, Intriligator J, Barton JS (2002) Schizophrenic subjects show deficient inhibition but intact task switching on saccadic tasks. Biol Psychiatry 51:816–826
Manoach DS, Thakkar KN, Cain MS, Polli FE, Edelman JA, Fischl B, Barton JS (2007) Neural activity is modulated by trial history: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade. J Neurosci 27(7):1791–1798
Mayr U, Keele SW (2000) Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. J Exp Psychol Gen 129(1):4–26
Mayr U, Kliegl R (2000) Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26:1124–1140
Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci 7(3):134–140
Mueller S, Swainson R, Jackson G (2009) ERP indices of persisting and current inhibitory control: a study of saccadic task switching. NeuroImage 45(1):191–197
Munoz DP, Everling S (2004) Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:218–228
Reuter B, Philipp A, Koch I, Kathmann N (2006) Effects of switching between leftward and rightward pro- and antisaccades. Biol Psychol 72(1):88–95
Reuter-Lorenz PA, Oonk HM, Barnes LL, Hughes C (1995) Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro- versus antisaccades: implications for an interpretation of the gap effect. Exp Brain Res 103(2):287–293
Roberts RJ, Hager LD, Heron C (1994) Prefrontal cognitive processes: working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. J Exp Psychol Gen 123:374–393
Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207–231
Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:763–797
Stuyven E, Van der Goten K, Vandierendonck A, Claeys K, Crevits L (2000) The effect of cognitive load on saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104:69–85
Unsworth N, Schrock JC, Engle RW (2004) Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(6):1302–1321
Vandierendonck A, Liefooghe B, Verbruggen F (2010) Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychol Bull 136:601–626
Yeung N, Nystrom LE, Aronson JA, Cohen JD (2006) Between-task competition and cognitive control in task switching. J Neurosci 26(5):1429–1438
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research project was part of the first author’s master thesis at Ghent University under the supervision of Baptist Liefooghe and André Vandierendonck. This thesis was awarded ‘Best Thesis 2009’ by the Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vermeiren, A., Liefooghe, B. & Vandierendonck, A. Switch performance in peripherally and centrally triggered saccades. Exp Brain Res 206, 243–248 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2401-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2401-5