Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

27-09-2016 | Original Article

How different location modes influence responses in a Simon-like task

Auteurs: Chunming Luo, Robert W. Proctor

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Spatial information can be conveyed not only by stimulus position but by the meaning of a location word or direction of an arrow. We examined whether all the location-, arrow- and word-based Simon effects or some of them can be observed when a location word or an arrow is presented eccentrically and a left–right keypress is made to indicate its ink color. Results showed that only the location-based Simon effect was observed for location words, whereas an additional smaller arrow-based Simon effect, compared to the location-based Simon effect was observed, for arrows. These results showed spatial location, arrow direction, and location word stimulus dimensions affect response position codes in a spatial-to-verbal priority order, consistent with the possibility that they can activate mode-specific spatial representations.
vorige artikel The role of executive control in the activation of manual affordances
volgende artikel Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm
Literatuur
Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMed
Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 853–861.PubMed
De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., & Custers, R. (2005). Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 659–666.CrossRefPubMed
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMed
Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J, & Milliken, B. (2007). Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 348–262.
Gibson, B. S., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17, 622–627.CrossRefPubMed
Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.CrossRef
Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12, 360–365.CrossRefPubMed
Khalid, S., & Ansorge, U. (2013). The Simon effect of spatial words in eye movements: Comparison of vertical and horizontal effects and of eye and finger responses. Vision Research, 86, 6–14.CrossRefPubMed
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed
Lameira, A. P., Pereira, A., Fraga-Filho, R. S., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2015). Stimulus–response compatibility with body parts: A study with hands. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 2127–2132.CrossRefPubMed
Lien, M.-C., Gray, D., Jardin, E., & Proctor, R. W. (2014). Correspondence effects are modulated primarily by object location not grasping affordance. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 679–698.CrossRef
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553.CrossRefPubMed
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: Effects of S-R associations strength and relative timing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 95–136.CrossRefPubMed
Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Fu, X., & Weng, X. (2010a). Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: The role of onset vs. offset cues. Psychological Research, 74, 277–290.CrossRefPubMed
Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Fu, X. (2010). Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 516–530.
Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Fu, X. (2011). The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: Analysing the “locus” of the modulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2455–2469.CrossRefPubMed
Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Fu, X. (2013). Reduction of the spatial Stroop effect by peripheral cueing as a function of the presence/absence of placeholders. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e69456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Luo, C., & Proctor, R. W. (2013). Asymmetry of congruency effects in spatial Stroop tasks can be eliminated. Acta Psychologica, 143, 7–13.CrossRefPubMed
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefPubMed
Marotta, A., Lupiáñez, J., Martella, D., & Casagrande, M. (2012). Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: Two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 326–335.PubMed
Masaki, H., Takasawa, N., & Yamazaki, K. (2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464–472.CrossRefPubMed
Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259.CrossRefPubMed
Miles, J. D., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words? Psychological Research, 76, 777–791.CrossRefPubMed
Miles, J. D., Yamaguchi, M., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1598–1606.CrossRef
Notebaert, W., De Moor, W., Gevers, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Newvisuospatial associations by training verbospatial mappings in the first language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1183–1188.CrossRef
Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). The Simon effect with conventional signals: A time-course analysis. Experimental Psychology, 56, 219–227.CrossRefPubMed
Peng, G., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2011). Hemisphere lateralization is influenced by bilingual status and composition of words. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1981–1986.CrossRefPubMed
Proctor, R. W., Marble, J. G., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11–24.CrossRefPubMed
Proctor, R. W., Yamaguchi, M., Zhang, Y., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2009). Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 434–445.CrossRefPubMed
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.CrossRefPubMed
Shimamura, A. (1987). Word comprehension and naming: An analysis of English and Japanese orthographies. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 15–40.CrossRef
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304–319.CrossRef
Vu, K. P. L., Ngo, T. K., Minakata, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). Shared spatial representations for physical locations and location words in bilinguals’ primary language. Memory & Cognition, 38, 713–722.CrossRef
Wang, X., Du, F., He, X., & Zhang, K. (2014). Enhanced spatial stimulus–response mapping near the hands: The Simon effect is modulated by hand-stimulus proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 22–52.
Wang, H., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus–response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1201–1207.
Yamaguchi, M., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Multidimensional vector model of stimulus–response compatibility. Psychological Review, 119, 272–303.CrossRefPubMed
Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193–205.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
How different location modes influence responses in a Simon-like task
Auteurs
Chunming Luo
Robert W. Proctor
Publicatiedatum
27-09-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0809-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2017

A cow on the prairie vs. a cow on the street: long-term consequences of semantic conflict on episodic encoding

  • Original Article

Reading sentences describing high- or low-pitched auditory events: only pianists show evidence for a horizontal space-pitch association

  • Original Article

A kinematic examination of hand perception

  • Original Article

The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces

  • Original Article

How serially organized working memory information interacts with timing

  • Original Article

Erratum to: No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching

  • Erratum