Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Gepubliceerd in:

01-07-2015 | Original Paper

Interpretation of Logical Words in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Uncovering Knowledge of Semantics and Pragmatics

Auteurs: Yi (Esther) Su, Lin-Yan Su

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 7/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

This study investigated the interpretation of the logical words ‘some’ and ‘every…or…’ in 4–15-year-old high-functioning Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Children with ASD performed similarly to typical controls in demonstrating semantic knowledge of simple sentences with ‘some’, and they had delayed knowledge of the complex sentences with ‘every…or…’. Interestingly, the children with ASD had pragmatic knowledge of the scalar implicatures of these logical words, parallel to those of the typical controls. Taken together, the interpretation of logical words may be a relative strength in children with ASD. It is possible that some aspects of semantics and pragmatics may be selectively spared in ASD, due to the contribution the language faculty makes to language acquisition in the ASD population.
vorige artikel Symptoms of Autism in Males with Fragile X Syndrome: A Comparison to Nonsyndromic ASD Using Current ADI-R Scores
volgende artikel Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review
Voetnoten
1
To illustrate how scalar implicatures arise, the logical words ‘some’ and ‘all’ compose a linguistic scale (e.g., <some, all>) based on information strength, with ‘all’ being more informative than ‘some’. The cooperative principle of Gricean pragmatics entreats a speaker to use the most informative expression in conversational contexts (Grice 1975). In a situation in which a sentence with ‘some’ and one with ‘all’ are both true, the cooperative speaker is expected to choose the more informative term ‘all’ over the weaker term ‘some’ to convey the information. Moreover, if the speaker asserts the weaker term ‘some’, the listener infers that the stronger term ‘all’ is not applicable, otherwise the speaker should use the stronger term ‘some’, thus the listener infers the negation of the stronger term, i.e., ‘not all’.
 
2
In this experimental study, the term ASD refers to children with autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder—not otherwise specified, i.e., children with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorders according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. See similar reports in Chevallier et al. (2010) and Pijnacker et al. (2009).
 
3
This is also the advantage of TVTJ over traditional act-out paradigms which request the participants to perform actions upon the experimenters’ commands. The act-out task may have limited value in determining the full range of interpretations that are associated with a linguistic expression, because children may simply favor one reading over others in the experimental contexts (Crain and Thornton 1998). Furthermore, it is harder for children with ASD to cooperate in act-out paradigms due to their lack of responsiveness to the experimenters’ instructions.
 
4
To ensure that children with ASD’s judgments in the every-or-underinformative condition were based on their correct understanding of the other semantic conditions of ‘every…or…’, we also refined our analysis by excluding children who didn’t judge correctly in the every-or-true or every-or-false conditions for 3/4 of the test trials. This left 3 younger children and 11 older children with ASD, as well as 13 TD children in each age group. The results showed that the rejection rates of the every-or-underinformative condition between these children with ASD vs. TD children were similar within different age groups: ASD/younger vs. TD/younger: t(14) = .69, p = .50, d = .43; ASD/older vs. TD/older: t(22) = .63, p = .53, d = .26.
 
5
Following the view of Noam Chomsky (1981, 1986), the language faculty is a biological mental system that implements the project procedures for associating human linguistic signals with interpretations. The language faculty imposes constraints on which languages human can naturally acquire. Language acquisition in normal children is then the by-product of a task-specific computational mechanism, which enables children to rapidly and effortlessly acquire any human language without formal instruction. More work is needed to investigate the possible role the language faculty plays in children with ASD.
 
6
However, as one reviewer pointed out, preserved pragmatic capacities may not necessarily be linked to grammatical strengths in ASD (Kissine 2012; Perkins 2008). In particular, although not all pragmatics involves mind-reading, the computation of pragmatic inferences like scalar implicatures may not be rooted within grammar (Geurts 2009). See also Chemla and Singh (2014a, b) for different interpretations of experimental data on scalar implicatures.
 
Literatuur
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A 15-year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boucher, J. (2012). Research review: Structural language in autistic spectrum disorder–characteristics and causes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 219–233.PubMedCrossRef
Chemla, E., & Singh, R. (2014a). Remarks on the experimental turn in the study of scalar implicature, Part I. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 373–386.CrossRef
Chemla, E., & Singh, R. (2014b). Remarks on the experimental turn in the study of scalar implicature, Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 387–399.CrossRef
Chevallier, C., Wilson, D., Happé, F., & Noveck, I. (2010). Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1104–1117.PubMedCrossRef
Chien, Y. C., & Wexler, K. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1, 225–295.CrossRef
Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 39–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, G., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., Crain, S., & Foppolo, F. (2004). Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of or. In I. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 283–300). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Clark, P., & Rutter, M. (1981). Autistic children’s responses to structure and interpersonal demands. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 201–217.PubMedCrossRef
Crain, S. (2012). The emergence of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Crain, S., Gualmini, A., & Pietroski, P. (2005). Brass tacks in linguistic theory: Innate grammatical principles. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and content (pp. 175–197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Crain, S., & Khlentzos, D. (2010). The logic instinct. Mind and Language, 25, 30–65.CrossRef
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2006). Acquisition of syntax and semantics. In M. Traxler & M. Gersbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 1073–1110). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRef
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2011). Acquisition of semantics. In P. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 745–748). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dennis, M., Lazenby, A. L., & Lockyer, L. (2001). Inferential language in high-function children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 47–54.PubMedCrossRef
Emerich, D. M., Creaghead, N. A., Grether, S. M., Murray, D., & Grasha, C. (2003). The comprehension of humorous materials by adolescents with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 253–257.PubMedCrossRef
Geurts, B. (2009). Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. Mind and Language, 24, 51–79.CrossRef
Gong, Y. X., & Cai, T. S. (1994). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised in China (C-WISC). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2, 1–6. (In Chinese).
Gong, Y. X., & Dai, X. Y. (1988). China-Wechsler Younger Children Scale of Intelligence (C-WYCSI). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 4, 364–376. (In Chinese).
Goodwin, A., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2012). Comprehension of wh-questions precedes their production in typical development and autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 5, 109–123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume III: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 667–696.CrossRef
Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism. A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–109.PubMedCrossRef
Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154.PubMedCrossRef
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in five-year olds: Evidence from real time spoken language comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1723–1739.PubMedCrossRef
Kaland, N., Moller-Nielsen, A., Callesen, K., Mortensen, E. L., Gottlieb, D., & Smith, L. (2002). A new ‘advanced’ test of theory of mind: Evidence from children and adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 517–528.PubMedCrossRef
Kelley, E., Paul, J., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2006). Residual language deficits in children with a history of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 807–828.PubMedCrossRef
Kissine, M. (2012). Pragmatics, cognitive flexibility and autism spectrum disorders. Mind and Language, 27, 1–28.CrossRef
Lee, D., & Chen, G.-P. (1989). Ravens Progressive Matrices (CRT): Chinese version. Shanghai: East China Normal University. (in Chinese).
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (2000). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., Jussila, K., Mattila, M.-L., Ryder, N., Ebeling, H., & Moilanen, I. (2007a). Answering contextually demanding questions: Pragmatic errors produced by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40, 357–381.PubMedCrossRef
Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., Kuusikko, S., Jussila, K., Mattila, M.-L., Ryder, N., & Moilanen, I. (2007b). Use of context in pragmatic language comprehension by children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1049–1059.PubMedCrossRef
Loukusa, S., & Moilanen, I. (2009). Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 890–904.CrossRef
Musolino, J., Chunyon, G., & Landau, B. (2010). Uncovering knowledge of core syntactic and semantic principles in individuals with Williams Syndrome. Language Learning and Development, 6, 126–161.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Notley, A., Thornton, R., & Crain, S. (2012). English-speaking children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of “not every”. Biolinguistics, 6, 32–69.
Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188.PubMedCrossRef
Noveck, I., & Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 425–431.PubMedCrossRef
Oi, M. (2010). Do Japanese children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder respond differently to wh-questions and yes/no-questions? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24, 691–705.PubMedCrossRef
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282.PubMedCrossRef
Perkins, M. (2008). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2012). Comparison of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 813–835.CrossRef
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013). Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition, 20, 133–154.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Pietroski, P., & Crain, S. (2012). The language faculty. In E. Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. P. Stich (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and cognitive science (pp. 361–381). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pijnacker, J., Hagoort, P., Buitelaar, J., Teunisse, J.-P., & Geurts, B. (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 607–618.PubMedCrossRef
Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I., Politzer, G., & Bastide, A. (2007). Processing costs and their impact on the development of scalar implicature. Language Acquisition, 14, 347–375.CrossRef
Rapin, I., & Dunn, M. (2003). Update on the language disorders of individuals on the autistic spectrum. Brain and Development, 25, 166–172.PubMedCrossRef
Saalasti, S., Lepisto, T., Toppila, E., Kujala, T., Laakso, M., Nieminem-von Wendt, T., & Jansson-Verkasalo, E. (2008). Language abilities in children with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1574–1580.PubMedCrossRef
Su, L.-Y. (2014). Child psychiatry. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press. (In Chinese).
Su, Y. (E.) (2013). Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22, 167–187.CrossRef
Su, Y. (E.) (2014). The acquisition of logical connectives in child Mandarin. Language Acquisition, 21, 119–155.CrossRef
Su, Y. (E.), & Crain, S. (2013). Children’s knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14, 599–631.
Su, Y. (E.), Jin, Y., Wan, G.-B., Zhang, J.-S., & Su, L.-Y. (2014). Interpretation of wh-words in high-functioning Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1364–1372.CrossRef
Su, Y. (E.), Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2012). Downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 39, 957–990.PubMedCrossRef
Sung, B., & Miao, X. C. (1990). The revision of trail norm of Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised (PPVT-R) in Shanghai. Psychological Science, 5, 20–25 (in Chinese).
Surian, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Van der Lely, H. (1996). Are children with autism deaf to Gricean Maxims? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, 55–71.PubMedCrossRef
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1994). Dissociations in form and function in the acquisition of language by autistic children. In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Constraints on language acquisition: Studies of atypical children (pp. 175–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2000a). Language and understanding minds: Connections in autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 124–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2000b). The challenge of studying language development in children with autism. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 313–332). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). Understanding the language and communicative impairments in autism. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 185–205.
Tager-Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. In F. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders: Diagnosis, development, neurobiology, and behavior (pp. 335–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Kotsopoulou, A., & Francis, A. (2014). Grammatical abilities of Greek-Speaking children with autism. Language Acquisition, 21, 4–44.CrossRef
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zhang, H. C. (2009). The revision of WISC-IV Chinese version. Psychological Science, 32, 1177–1179. (in Chinese).
Zhou, P., Crain, S., Gao, L., Tang, Y., & Jia, M. (2014). The use of grammatical morphemes by Mandarin-speaking children with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.​1007/​s10803-014-2304-6.
Metagegevens
Titel
Interpretation of Logical Words in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Uncovering Knowledge of Semantics and Pragmatics
Auteurs
Yi (Esther) Su
Lin-Yan Su
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2350-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2015

Preliminary Effectiveness of Project ImPACT: A Parent-Mediated Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Delivered in a Community Program

  • Original Paper

Brief Report: Gestures in Children at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Brief Report

Brief Report: Adaptive Functioning in Children with ASD, ADHD and ASD + ADHD

  • Brief Report

The Understanding of Intentions, Desires and Beliefs in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Open Access

Reliability and Validity of the Interactive Drawing Test: A Measure of Reciprocity for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Open Access
  • Original Paper

Psychophysiological Correlates of Developmental Changes in Healthy and Autistic Boys

  • Original Paper