Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Personal Control, Self-Efficacy in Sexual Negotiation, and Contraceptive Risk among Adolescents: The Role of Gender

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescents’ sexual decision making is shaped by normative ideas about “appropriate” sexual roles for women and men; consequently, the motivation and ability to engage in safer sex may be different for adolescent girls and boys. The aim of this study was to explore how social–psychological resources influence the behavior of girls and boys within the highly gendered and inequitable domain of sexual relationships. I used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) to examine whether personal control and self-efficacy in sexual negotiation are associated with contraceptive risk (engaging in sexual intercourse or not using condoms) among adolescents and whether these associations differ for adolescent boys and girls. Results indicate that personal control and self-efficacy in sexual negotiation are significantly associated with safer sex behavior, and are often more important for girls than for boys in predicting contraceptive risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alan Guttmacher Institute (1999). Facts in brief: Teen sex and pregnancy. Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/fb_teen_sex.

  • Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 30, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L., Belgrave, F. Z., & Reisen, C. A. (2000). Gender roles, power strategies, and precautionary sexual self-efficacy: Implications for Black and Latina women’s HIV/AIDS protective behaviors. Sex Roles, 42, 613–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, T. M., & Thombs, D. L. (1994). Dimensions of self-efficacy among three distinct groups of condom users. Journal of American College Health, 42, 167–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. A. (1995). Male gender roles and sexuality: Implications for women’s AIDS risk and prevention. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gaston, J. F., Jensen, L., & Weed, S. (1995). A closer look at adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gaston, J. F., Weed, S., & Jensen, L. (1996). Understanding gender differences in adolescent sexuality. Adolescence, 31, 217–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F. Jr., Morgan, S. P., Moore, K. A., & Peterson, J. L. (1987). Race differences in the timing of adolescent intercourse. American Sociological Review, 52, 511–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N., McPhillips, K., & Doherty, M. (2001). “If it’s not on, it’s not on”—Or is it? Discursive constraints on women’s condom use. Gender & Society, 15, 917–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, D. S., Primavera, C., & Bartalini, G. (1996). Risk behaviors, self-efficacy, and AIDS prevention among adolescents. Journal of Psychology, 130, 537–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, C. A., & Marin, B. V. (1996). Gender, culture, and power: Barriers to HIV-prevention strategies for women. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, L., Oh, H. J., & Gillmore, M. R. (2000). Toward an understanding of (em)power(ment) for HIV/AIDS prevention with adolescent women. Sex Roles, 42, 581–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. R., Rindfuss, R. R., & Guilkey, D. K. (1990). Adolescent contraceptive method choices. Demography, 27, 323–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. B. (1997). Not our kind of girl: Unraveling the myths of Black teenage motherhood. Berkeley, California: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. A. (1986). Contraceptive self-efficacy: A perspective on teenage girls’ contraceptive behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. A. (1995). Reproductive and contraceptive knowledge, contraceptive self-efficacy, and contraceptive behavior among teenage women. Adolescence, 30, 65–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. A., Wan, C. K., & Beamer, L. J. (1998). The contraceptive self-efficacy scale: Analysis in four samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 773–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. K., Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1999). Establishing a sense of personal control in the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 77, 1559–1573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: The politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, W. (1993). Adolescent males’ orientation toward paternity and contraception. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 22–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Boys and girls at adolescence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1983). Paranoia and the structure of powerlessness. American Sociological Review, 48, 228–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003a). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003b). Education, social status, and health. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S., & Rosenthal, D. (1993). Sexuality in adolescence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Protection (2001). Tracking the hidden epidemics: Trends in STDs in the United States 2000. Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/Stats_Trends/Trends2000.pdf.

  • Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1990). Contraceptive attitudes and intention to use condoms in sexually experienced and inexperienced adolescent males. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 294–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1989). Explaining the social patterns of depression: Control and problem-solving or support and talking? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 206–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., & Sastry, J. (1999). The sense of personal control: Social-structural causes and emotional consequences. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 369–394). New York: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Abma, J., McNeely, C. S., & Resnick, M. (2000). Adolescent sexual behavior: Estimates and trends from four nationally representative surveys. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 156–165,194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M., & Seeman, T. E. (1983). Health behavior and personal autonomy: A longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 144–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soler, H., Quadagno, D., Sly, D. F., Riehman, K. S., Eberstein, I. W., & Harrison, D. F. (2000). Relationship dynamics, ethnicity, and condom use among low-income women. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 82–88,101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steers, W. N., Elliott, E., Nemiro, J., Ditman, D., & Oskamp, S. (1996). Health beliefs as predictors of HIV-preventive behavior and ethnic differences in prediction. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 99–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, E., & Manlove, J. (2000). Trends in sexual activity and contraceptive use among teens. Washington, District of Columbia: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1987). Gender and marital status differences in control and distress: Common stress versus unique stress explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 7–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (1998). Sexual relationships, negotiation, and decision making. In J. Coleman & D. Roker (Eds.), Teenage sexuality: Health, risk, and education (pp. 59–80). Amsterdam: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8, 324–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschann, J. M., Adler, N. E., Millstein, S. G., Gurvey, J. E., & Ellen, J. M. (2002). Relative power between sexual partners and condom use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (2003). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), waves I & II, 1994–1996; wave III, 2001–2002 [machine-readable data file and documentation] Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D. (1993). Sociodemographic position, world views, and psychological distress. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 575–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Anderson, K., Glick, J., & Shapiro, A. (1998). Domestic violence, personal control, and gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 442–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B. (1980). The sociogenesis of psychological disorder: An attributional theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 100–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Chandra Muller and Debra Umberson for their comments on previous drafts of this article. The author would also like to thank the members of the Adolescent Health and Academic Achievement project for their comments and suggestions. The author accepts full responsibility for any shortcomings of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Population Research Center, The University of Texas, 1 University Station G1800, Austin, TX, 78712-0544, USA

    Jennifer Pearson

Authors
  1. Jennifer Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Pearson.

Additional information

This research was funded by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under grant R01 HD40428-02 to the Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Chandra Muller (PI), and from the National Science Foundation under grant REC-0126167 to the Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Chandra Muller (PI). This research is based on data from the Add Health project, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry (PI) and Peter Bearman, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Persons interested in obtaining data files from Add Health should contact Add Health, Carolina Population Center, 123 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524 (addhealth@unc.edu). Opinions reflect those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the granting agencies.

Appendix

Appendix

Descriptive Statistics for the Full Add Health Sample and Analytical Samples (Unweighted)

 

Mean or Proportion (Standard Deviation)

Full Add Health sample

Sexual intercourse sample

Condom use sample

Sex/gender

   

Boys

.495

.488

.500

Girls

.505

.512

.500

Racial/ethnic identity

   

Non-Latino/ a White

.504

.506

.481

Non-Latino/ a Black

.225

.201

.259

Latino/a

.170

.187

.184

Asian

.071

.079

.047

Other

.030

.027

.030

Age

16.165 (1.723)

16.679 (1.023)

16.870 (1.023)

Time between interviews

10.950 (1.757)

10.981 (1.693)

11.071 (1.661)

Socioeconomic status

   

Family income

45.926(44.403)

46.982 (49.128)

43.341 (34.709)

Parent’s education

2.835 (1.258)

2.840 (1.278)

2.711 (1.208)

N

20,745

8,589

3,572

  1. Source: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, J. Personal Control, Self-Efficacy in Sexual Negotiation, and Contraceptive Risk among Adolescents: The Role of Gender. Sex Roles 54, 615–625 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9028-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9028-9

Keywords