Abstract
Verb-object phrases (open the umbrella, knock on the table) are usually remembered better if they have been enacted during study (also called subject-performed tasks) than if they have merely been learned verbally (verbal tasks). This enactment effect is particularly pronounced for phrases for which the objects (table) are present as cues in the study and test contexts. In previous studies with retrieval cues for some phrases, the enactment effect in free recall for the other phrases has been surprisingly small or even nonexistent. The present study tested whether the often replicated enactment effect in free recall can be found if none of the phrases contains context cues. In Experiment 1, we tested, and corroborated, the suppression hypothesis: The enactment effect for a given type of phrase (marker phrases) is modified by the presence or absence of cues for the other phrases in the list (experimental phrases). Experiments 2 and 3 replicated the enactment effect for phrases without cues. Experiment 2 also showed that the presence of cues either at study or at test is sufficient for obtaining a suppression effect, and Experiment 3 showed that the enactment effect may disappear altogether if retrieval cues are very salient.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arar, L., Koliç, S., & Molander, B. (1997, August).Familiarity, emotionality, motor activity, and memorability of imagined actions: Influence on the SPT effect. Paper presented at the Sixth European Workshop on Imagery and Cognition, Oslo.
Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection.Psychological Review,89, 708–729.
Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 553–563.
Brooks, B. M., &Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks.Memory & Cognition,22, 27–33.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,22, 267–281.
Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., &Mantini Atkinson, T. (1987). Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition,15, 109–118.
Daprati, E., Nico, D., Saimpont, A., Franck, N., &Sirigu, A. (2005). Memory and action: An experimental study on normal subjects and schizophrenic patients.Neuropsychologia,43, 281–293.
Earles, J. L. (1996). Adult age differences in recall of performed and nonperformed items.Psychology & Aging,11, 638–648.
Earles, J. L., &Kersten, A. W. (2000). Adult age differences in memory for verbs and nouns.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,7, 30–139.
Earles, J. L., &Kersten, A. W. (2002). Directed forgetting of actions by younger and older adults.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 383–388.
Earles, J. L., Kersten, A. W., Turner, J. M., &McMullen, J. (1999). Influences of age, performance, and item relatedness on verbatim and gist recall of verb-noun pairs.Journal of General Psychology,126, 97–110.
Eich, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Einstein, G. O., &Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 588–598.
Engelkamp, J. (1991). Memory of action events: Some implications for memory theory and for imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and cognition (pp. 183–219). New York: Springer.
Engelkamp, J. (1997). Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks.Memory & Cognition,25, 117–124.
Engelkamp, J. (1998).Memory for actions. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Engelkamp, J., &Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 671–682.
Engelkamp, J., &Jahn, P. (2003). Lexical, conceptual and motor information in memory for action phrases: A multi-system account.Acta Psychologica,113, 147–165.
Engelkamp, J., &Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials [Image and motor processes in the retention of verbal materials].Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie,27, 511–533.
Engelkamp, J., Mohr, G., &Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs.Psychological Research,53, 232–239.
Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., &Zimmer, H. D. (2004). Memory for actions: Item and relational information in categorized lists.Psychological Research,9, 1–10.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1996). Organisation and recall in verbal tasks and in subject-performed tasks.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,8, 257–273.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks.Acta Psychologica,96, 43–60.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. (2001). Categorical and order information in free recall of action phrases.Psicologica,22, 71–96.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (2002). Free recall and organization as a function of varying relational encoding in action memory.Psychological Research,66, 91–98.
Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., &Kurbjuweit, A. (1995). Verb frequency and enactment in implicit and explicit memory.Psychological Research,57, 242–249.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., &Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191.
Foley, M. A., Bouffard, V., Raag, T., &DiSanto Rose, M. (1991). The effects of enactive encoding, type of movement, and imagined perspective on memory of dance.Psychological Research,53, 251–259.
Helstrup, T. (1989). Loci for act recall: Contextual influence on the processing of action events.Psychological Research,51, 168–175.
Helstrup, T. (1996). What does it take for context to support action memory?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,37, 183–194.
Helstrup, T. (2004). The enactment effect is due to more than guesses and beliefs.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,45, 259–263.
Helstrup, T. (2005). In search of a motor element in memory for enacted events.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,17, 389–403.
Helstrup, T., &Molander, B. (1996). Procedural dependence in action memory: Effects of verb form and individual vs group conditions.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,37, 329–337.
Hornstein, S. L., &Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 367–372.
Jahn, P., &Engelkamp, J. (2003). Design-effects in prospective and retrospective memory for actions.Experimental Psychology,50, 4–15.
Knopf, M. (1995a). Beyond verbal memory—Enhancing memory by acting. In B. J. Vellas, J. L. Albarede, & P. J. Garry (Eds.),Mood and cognitive disorders: Facts and research in gerontology (pp. 43–53). New York: Springer.
Knopf, M. (1995b). Das Erinnern eigener Handlungen im Alter [Memory for self-performed actions in old age].Zeitschrift für Psychologie,203, 335–349.
Knopf, M., Mack, W., Lenel, A., &Ferrante, S. (2005). Memory for action events: Findings in neurological patients.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,46, 11–19.
Koriat, A., Ben Zur, H., &Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory.Psychological Research,53, 260–270.
Koriat, A., &Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2003). Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 435–454.
Koriat, A., Pearlman-Avnion, S., &Ben Zur, H. (1998). The subjective organization of input and output events in memory.Psychological Research,61, 295–307.
Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7, 337–363.
McNamara, D. S., &Healy, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 399–416.
Mecklenbräuker, S., Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Goergens, N. K. (2007).Retrieval cues in children’s memory for actions: Attention-based processes brought about incidentally. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts.Psychological Research,51, 181–187.
Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 54–69.
Mulligan, N. W., &Hornstein, S. L. (2003). Memory for actions: Self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect.Memory & Cognition,31, 412–421.
Mulligan, N. W., &Lozito, J. P. (2004). Self-generation and memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 45, pp. 175–214). San Diego: Elsevier.
Nilsson, L.-G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nilsson, L.-G., &Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Vol. 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 427–432). New York: Wiley.
Norris, M. P., &West, R. L. (1993). Activity memory and aging: The role of motor retrieval and strategic processing.Psychology & Aging,8, 81–86.
Nyberg, L., Nilsson, L.-G., &Bäckman, L. (1991). A component analysis of action events.Psychological Research,53, 219–225.
Oloffson, U. (1996). The effect of enactment on memory for order.Psychological Research,59, 75–79.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, P. L., &Kausler, D. H. (1992). Variation in external context and adult age differences in action memory.Experimental Aging Research,18, 41–44.
Ratner, H. H., &Hill, L. (1991). The development of children’s action memory: When do actions speak louder than words?Psychological Research,53, 195–202.
Roediger, H. L. III, &Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 91–105.
Saltz, E., &Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 322–332.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
Steffens, M. C. (1998).Das Gedächtnis für ausgeführte Handlungen Memory for performed actions. Lengerich: Pabst.
Steffens, M. C. (1999). The role of relational processing in memory for actions: A negative enactment effect in free recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 877–903.
Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., &Wender, K. F. (2003). Quite ordinary retrieval cues may determine free recall of actions.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 399–415.
Steffens, M. C., &Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 705–733.
Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., Mecklenbräuker, S., &Thompson, E. M. (2006). Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: A multinomial modelling approach.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 557–576.
Tulving, E., &Psotka, J. (1971). Retroactive inhibition in free-recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 1–8.
von Essen, J. D. (2005). Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,46, 315–321.
von Essen, J. D., &Nilsson, L.-G. (2003). Memory effects of motor activation in subject-performed tasks and sign language.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 445–449.
Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Memory after motoric encoding in a generation- recognition model.Psychological Research,53, 226–231.
Zimmer, H. D., &Cohen, R. L. (2001). Remembering actions: A specific type of memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.),Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 3–24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components.Acta Psychologica,58, 81–106.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1989). Does motor encoding enhance relational information?Psychological Research,51, 158–167.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (2003). Signing enhances memory like performing actions.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 450–454.
Zimmer, H. D., Helstrup, T., &Engelkamp, J. (2000). Pop-out into memory: A retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 658–670.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported in this article was supported by Grant STE 938/5-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsge meinschaft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steffens, M.C., Buchner, A., Wender, K.F. et al. Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: Enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment. Mem Cogn 35, 1841–1853 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192919
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192919