Abstract
We examined whether the onset of a new object defined by illusory contours is detected with greater frequency than offset when neither is associated with a unique sensory transient. Observers performed a “one-shot” change detection task in which offsetting or onsetting elements of high luminance contrast circles generated the appearance or disappearance of a Kanizsa figure. Presenting “illusory figures” via this “flicker” method ensures that (1) any unique luminance transients associated with the two types of change are eliminated, and (2) the objects themselves can only be represented at a relatively high level. Results showed that offsets were detected more frequently than onsets only when they generated the onset of a Kanizsa figure. We argue that object appearance dominates object disappearance via mechanisms that operate at the level at which objects are constructed.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. [W.], Gellatly, A., &Heywood, C. (2003). Dectectability of onsets versus offsets in the change detection paradigm.Journal of Vision,3, 22–31.
Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W., &Heywood, C. A. (2004). Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: The special role of object onset.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 464–477.
Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W., &Heywood, C. A. (2005). Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation.Psychological Science,16, 270–274.
Cole, G. G., &Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 588–593.
Franconeri, S. L., Hollingworth, A., &Simons, D. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention?Psychological Science,16, 275–282.
Frisby, J. P. (1979).Seeing: Illusion, brain, and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gellatly, A. R. H., &Cole, G. G. (2000). Accuracy of target detection in new-object and old-object displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 889–899.
Gellatly, A. R. H., Cole, G. G., &Blurton, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1609–1624.
Gibson, B. S. (1996). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1514–1520.
Gold, J. M., Murray, R. F., Bennett, P. J., &Sekuler, A. B. (2000). Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours.Current Biology,10, 663–666.
Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 683–702.
Martin-Emerson, R., &Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 739–751.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 567–571.
Phillips, W. A., &Singer, W. (1974). Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision: I.Psychophysics. Experimental Brain Research,19, 493–506.
Pisella, L. P., Berberovic, N., &Mattingly, J. P. (2004). Impaired memory for location but not for color or shape in visual neglect: A comparison of parietal and non-parietal lesions.Cortex,40, 379–390.
Pratt, J., &McAuliffe, J. (2001). The effects of onset and offset on visual attention.Psychological Research,65, 185–191.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Ro, T., Russell, C., &Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.Psychological Science,12, 94–99.
Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm.Visual Cognition,7, 377–396.
Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail.Psychological Science,7, 301–305.
Simons, D. J., &Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 16–20.
Stelmach, L. B., Bourassa, C. M., &DiLollo, V. (1984). Detection of stimulus change: The hypothetical roles of visual transient responses.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 245–255.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 583–597.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1505–1513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by U. K. Economic and Social Research Council Grant RES-000-22-0888 to the first author and by U. K. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant 12/S19168 to the third author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, G.G., Kuhn, G. & Liversedge, S.P. Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 939–943 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194125
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194125