27-01-2025 | Review

Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review

Auteurs: Motahareh Karimijashni, Shokoofih Abbasalipour, Marie Westby, Tim Ramsay, Paul E. Beaulé, Stéphane Poitras

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose

Involving patients in developing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for accurately capturing their perspectives. However, understanding how patients were involved in developing PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty is limited. This scoping review aimed to evaluate whether patients were involved in the development of these PROMs and how they were involved.

Methods

Two independent reviewers documented patient involvement in item development and comprehensibility testing for 50 PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty. Trends in patient involvement over time were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

Results

There was no documentation of patient involvement in a collaborative role during the PROM development processes. Regarding the consultative role, of these 26 PROMs, they contributed to item development in 13 PROMs (26%) and comprehensibility testing in four PROMs (8%) and both item development and comprehensibility testing in nine PROMs (18%). Patients who underwent arthroplasty were involved in one or both phases in ten PROMs (20%), while patients with other lower extremity conditions were involved in 16 PROMs (32%). Patients who underwent arthroplasty contributed to both phases in five PROMs: Oxford Knee Score-Activity and Participation Questionnaire, Patient’s Knee Implant Performance Questionnaire, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System R-Plus-Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score and Oxford Arthroplasty Early Change Score. In addition, our analysis revealed no significant change in patient involvement in a consultative role during either item development or comprehensibility evaluation over time since 1982, when the first PROM included in this review was developed (p = 0.21).

Conclusions

Almost half of PROMs used after arthroplasty did not involve patients in their development, highlighting the need to address this gap in development of PROMs. There is also a need to analyze PROMs to ensure they accurately reflect the outcomes that matter to patients.

Van Manen, M. D., Nace, J., & Mont, M. A. (2012). Management of primary knee osteoarthritis and indications for total knee arthroplasty for general practitioners. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 112(11), 709–715.PubMed

Neuprez, A., Neuprez, A. H., Kaux, J. F., Kurth, W., Daniel, C., Thirion, T., Huskin, J. P., Gillet, P., Bruyère, O., & Reginster, J. Y. (2020). Total joint replacement improves pain, functional quality of life, and health utilities in patients with late-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis for up to 5 years. Clinical rheumatology, 39(3), 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04811-yCrossRefPubMed

Eichler, D., Beaulieu, Y., Barry, J., Massé, V., & Vendittoli, P. A. (2020). Perception of a natural joint after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(2), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.036CrossRefPubMed

Hossain, F. S., Konan, S., Patel, S., Rodriguez-Merchan, E. C., & Haddad, F. S. (2015). The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: Are we there yet? The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34434CrossRef

Meadows, K. A. (2011). Patient-reported outcome measures: An overview. British Journal of Community Nursing, 16(3), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.3.146CrossRefPubMed

Haywood, K. L. (2007). Patient-reported outcome II: Selecting appropriate measures for musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care, 5(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.101CrossRefPubMed

Wiering, B., de Boer, D., & Delnoij, D. (2017). Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: A scoping review. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 20(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12442CrossRefPubMed

Davies, S., & Staley, K. (2009). Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Involve.

Weldring, T., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Services Insights, 6, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.4137/HSI.S11093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Trujols, J., Portella, M. J., Iraurgi, I., Campins, M. J., Siñol, N., & de Los Cobos, J. P. (2013). Patient-reported outcome measures: Are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued? Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 22(6), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.734653CrossRefPubMed

11.

Karimijashni, M., Abtahi, F., Abbasalipour, S., Ranjbar, P., Dabbagh, A., Westby, M., Ramsay, T., Beaulé, P. E., & Poitras, S. (2024). Functional patient-reported outcome measures after hip or knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and content analysis using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Arthritis care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25413CrossRef

12.

Chang, S., Newton, P. J., Inglis, S., Luckett, T., Krum, H., Macdonald, P., & Davidson, P. M. (2014). Are all outcomes in chronic heart failure rated equally? An argument for a patient-centred approach to outcome assessment. Heart Failure Reviews, 19(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-012-9369-0CrossRefPubMed

13.

McKenna, S. P. (2011). Measuring patient-reported outcomes: Moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Medicine, 9, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.CrossRef

16.

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850CrossRefPubMed

17.

Dreinhöfer, K., Stucki, G., Ewert, T., Huber, E., Ebenbichler, G., Gutenbrunner, C., Kostanjsek, N., & Cieza, A. (2004). ICF core sets for osteoarthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501960410015498CrossRef

18.

Pisoni, C., Giardini, A., Majani, G., & Maini, M. (2008). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core sets for osteoarthritis. A useful tool in the follow-up of patients after joint arthroplasty. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(4), 377–385.PubMed

19.

Lange, T., Schmitt, J., Kopkow, C., Rataj, E., Günther, K. P., & Lützner, J. (2017). What do patients expect from total knee arthroplasty? A delphi consensus study on patient treatment goals. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(7), 2093.e1-2099.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.053CrossRef

20.

Lützner, C., Postler, A. E., Druschke, D., Riedel, R., Günther, K. P., & Lange, T. (2022). Ask patients what they expect! A survey among patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty in Germany. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 37(8), 1594-1601.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.067CrossRefPubMed

21.

Tritter, J. Q. (2009). Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 12(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.xCrossRefPubMed

22.

Beresford, P., & Russo, J. (2020). Patient and public involvement in research. Achieving person-centred health systems (pp. 145–172). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

23.

Bryant, E. A., Scott, A. M., Greenwood, H., & Thomas, R. (2022). Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: A scoping review. British Medical Journal Open, 12(9), e055428. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055428CrossRef

24.

Howard Wilsher, S., Brainard, J., Loke, Y., & Salter, C. (2017). Patient and public involvement in health literacy interventions: A mapping review. Research Involvement and Engagement, 3, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-017-0081-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Tillett, W., Adebajo, A., Brooke, M., Campbell, W., Coates, L. C., FitzGerald, O., Gossec, L., Helliwell, P., Hewlett, S., James, J., Minnock, P., Reast, A., O’Sullivan, D., de Wit, M., & McHugh, N. (2014). Patient involvement in outcome measures for psoriatic arthritis. Current Rheumatology Reports, 16(5), 418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-014-0418-7CrossRefPubMed

26.

Shippee, N. D., Domecq Garces, J. P., Prutsky Lopez, G. J., et al. (2015). Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expectations, 18(5), 1151–1166.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Impellizzeri, F. M., Leunig, M., Preiss, S., Guggi, T., & Mannion, A. F. (2017). The use of the core outcome measures index (COMI) in patients undergoing total knee replacement. The Knee, 24(2), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2016.11.016CrossRefPubMed

28.

Baldini, A., Anderson, J. A., Zampetti, P., Pavlov, H., & Sculco, T. P. (2006). A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 452, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238847.34047.90CrossRefPubMed

29.

Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., Harner, C. D., Kurosaka, M., Neyret, P., Richmond, J. C., & Shelborne, K. D. (2001). Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(5), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290051301CrossRefPubMed

30.

Irrgang, J. J., Snyder-Mackler, L., Wainner, R. S., Fu, F. H., & Harner, C. D. (1998). Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 80(8), 1132–1145. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199808000-00006CrossRefPubMed

31.

Noble, P. C., Scuderi, G. R., Brekke, A. C., Sikorskii, A., Benjamin, J. B., Lonner, J. H., Chadha, P., Daylamani, D. A., Scott, W. N., & Bourne, R. B. (2012). Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2152-zCrossRefPubMed

32.

Dinjens, R. N., Grimm, B., Heyligers, I. C., & Senden, R. (2016). Adjustments in 2011 KSS increase the clinical suitability. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 82(1), 43–51.PubMed

33.

Scuderi, G. R., Sikorskii, A., Bourne, R. B., Lonner, J. H., Benjamin, J. B., & Noble, P. C. (2016). The knee society short form reduces respondent burden in the assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4370-2CrossRefPubMed

34.

Roos, E. M., Roos, H. P., Lohmander, L. S., Ekdahl, C., & Beynnon, B. D. (1998). Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 28(2), 88–96.CrossRef

35.

Gandek, B., Roos, E. M., Franklin, P. D., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2019). Item selection for 12-item short forms of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS-12) and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS-12). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 27(5), 746–753.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Perruccio, A. V., Lohmander, L. S., Canizares, M., Tennant, A., Hawker, G. A., Conaghan, P. G., Roos, E. M., Jordan, J. M., Maillefert, J. F., Dougados, M., & Davis, A. M. (2008). The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-physical function shortform (KOOS-PS)–an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 16(5), 542–550.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Lyman, S., Lee, Y. Y., Franklin, P. D., Li, W., Cross, M. B., & Padgett, D. E. (2016). Validation of the KOOS, JR: A short-form knee arthroplasty outcomes survey. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474, 1461–1471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Kujala, U. M., Jaakkola, L. H., Koskinen, S. K., Taimela, S., Hurme, M., & Nelimarkka, O. (1993). Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 9(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80366-4CrossRef

39.

Remy, F., Besson, A., Gougeon, F., Migaud, H., & Duquennoy, A. (1999). Evaluation fonctionnelle de l’instabilite femoro-patellaire par un score 100 points. Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l appareil moteur, 85, 145–145.

40.

Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery., 80(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859CrossRefPubMed

41.

Dawson, J., Beard, D. J., McKibbin, H., Harris, K., Jenkinson, C., & Price, A. J. (2014). Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of activity and participation (the OKS-APQ) to supplement the Oxford knee score. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96B(3), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.32845CrossRef

42.

Mancuso, C. A., Ranawat, A. S., Meftah, M., Koob, T. W., & Ranawat, C. S. (2012). Properties of the patient administered questionnaires: New scales measuring physical and psychological symptoms of hip and knee disorders. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 27(4), 575-582.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.014CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lewis, S., Price, M., Dwyer, K. A., O’Brien, S., Heekin, R. D., Yates, P. J., Beverland, D., & Mordin, M. (2014). Development of a scale to assess performance following primary total knee arthroplasty. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 17(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.006CrossRefPubMed

44.

Schifferdecker, K. E., Yount, S. E., Kaiser, K., Adachi-Mejia, A., Cella, D., Carluzzo, K. L., Eisenstein, A., Kallen, M. A., Greene, G. J., Eton, D. T., & Fisher, E. S. (2018). A method to create a standardized generic and condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure for patient care and healthcare improvement. Quality of life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1675-5CrossRefPubMed

45.

Liebs, T. R., Herzberg, W., Gluth, J., Rüther, W., Haasters, J., Russlies, M., & Hassenpflug, J. (2013). Using the patient’s perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95B(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.28383CrossRef

46.

Impellizzeri, F. M., Mannion, A. F., Naal, F. D., & Leunig, M. (2013). A core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 28(9), 1681–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.014CrossRefPubMed

47.

Mahomed, N. N., Arndt, D. C., McGrory, B. J., & Harris, W. H. (2001). The Harris hip score: Comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 16(5), 575–580. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.23716CrossRefPubMed

48.

Sharma, S., Shah, R., Draviraj, K. P., & Bhamra, M. S. (2005). Use of telephone interviews to follow up patients after total hip replacement. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(4), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633054068883CrossRefPubMed

49.

Klässbo, M., Larsson, E., & Mannevik, E. (2003). Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 32(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740310000409CrossRefPubMed

50.

Davis, A. M., Perruccio, A. V., Canizares, M., Tennant, A., Hawker, G. A., Conaghan, P. G., Roos, E. M., Jordan, J. M., Maillefert, J. F., Dougados, M., & Lohmander, L. S. (2008). The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-physical function shortform (HOOS-PS): An OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 16(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.016CrossRefPubMed

51.

Lyman, S., Lee, Y. Y., Franklin, P. D., Li, W., Mayman, D. J., & Padgett, D. E. (2016). Validation of the HOOS, JR: A short-form hip replacement survey. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474(6), 1472–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Martin, R. L., Kelly, B. T., & Philippon, M. J. (2006). Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 22(12), 1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.027CrossRef

53.

Thorborg, K., Hölmich, P., Christensen, R., Petersen, J., & Roos, E. M. (2011). The copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS): Development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(6), 478–491.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Kavanagh, B. F., & Fitzgerald, R. H., Jr. (1985). Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 193, 133–140.CrossRef

55.

Johanson, N. A., Liang, M. H., Daltroy, L., Rudicel, S., & Richmond, J. (2004). American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery., 86(5), 902–909. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200405000-00003CrossRefPubMed

56.

Behrend, H., Giesinger, K., Giesinger, J. M., & Kuster, M. S. (2012). The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: Validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 27(3), 430-436.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035CrossRefPubMed

57.

Robinson, P. G., Rankin, C. S., Lavery, J., Anthony, I., Blyth, M., & Jones, B. (2018). The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score. Journal of Orthopaedics, 15(2), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Porter, M. A., Johnston, M. G., Kogan, C., Gray, C. G., Eppich, K. E., & Scott, D. F. (2023). The joint awareness score: A shortened, simplified, improved alternative to the forgotten joint score. Arthroplasty Today, 24, 101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Lott, S. A., & Riddle, D. L. (1999). The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Physical Therapy, 79(4), 371–383.PubMed

60.

Gabel, C. P., Melloh, M., Burkett, B., & Michener, L. A. (2012). Lower limb functional index: Development and clinimetric properties. Physical therapy, 92(1), 98–110.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Gittings, P. M., Heberlien, N., Devenish, N., Parker, M., Phillips, M., Wood, F. M., & Edgar, D. W. (2016). The lower limb functional index—a reliable and valid functional outcome assessment in burns. Burns: Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 42(6), 1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.028CrossRefPubMed

62.

McNair, P. J., Prapavessis, H., Collier, J., Bassett, S., Bryant, A., & Larmer, P. (2007). The lower-limb tasks questionnaire: An assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal important differences. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(8), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.008CrossRefPubMed

63.

Tegner, Y., & Lysholm, J. (1985). Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 198, 43–49.CrossRef

64.

Marx, R. G., Stump, T. J., Jones, E. C., Wickiewicz, T. L., & Warren, R. F. (2001). Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290021601CrossRefPubMed

65.

Rat, A. C., Coste, J., Pouchot, J., Baumann, M., Spitz, E., Retel-Rude, N., Le Quintrec, J. S., Dumont-Fischer, D., & Guillemin, F. (2005). OAKHQOL: A new instrument to measure quality of life in knee and hip osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.011CrossRefPubMed

66.

Strickland, L. H., Murray, D. W., Pandit, H. G., & Jenkinson, C. (2020). Development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and change measure for use in early recovery following hip or knee replacement. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00262-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. W. (1988). Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Journal of Rheumatology, 15(12), 1833–1840.PubMed

68.

Hirsch, P. B., Gollish, J. D., Hawker, G., Kreder, H., Mahomed, N., & Williams, J. I. (2000). Reduction of the WOMAC using Rasch methodology. Information strategy: Urgency rating, waiting list management and patient out-comes monitoring for primary hip/knee joint replacement (pp. 68–73). Toronto: ICES Consensus Group.

69.

Whitehouse, S. L., Lingard, E. A., Katz, J. N., & Learmonth, I. D. (2003). Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery., 85(5), 706–711.PubMed

70.

Tubach, F., Baron, G., Falissard, B., Logeart, I., Dougados, M., Bellamy, N., & Ravaud, P. (2005). Using patients’ and rheumatologists’ opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.019539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Bilbao, A., Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Las Hayas, C., & Orive, M. (2011). Validation of a proposed WOMAC short form for patients with hip osteoarthritis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-75CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Kirwan, J. R., Fries, J. F., Hewlett, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2011). Patient perspective: Choosing or developing instruments. The Journal of Rheumatology, 38(8), 1716–1719. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110390CrossRefPubMed

73.

Rolstad, S., Adler, J., & Rydén, A. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 14(8), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003CrossRefPubMed

74.

Kluzek, S., Dean, B., & Wartolowska, K. A. (2022). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 27(3), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111573CrossRefPubMed

75.

Lasch, K. E., Marquis, P., Vigneux, M., Abetz, L., Arnould, B., Bayliss, M., Crawford, B., & Rosa, K. (2010). PRO development: Rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 19(8), 1087–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6CrossRefPubMed

76.

Magasi, S., Ryan, G., Revicki, D., Lenderking, W., Hays, R. D., Brod, M., Snyder, C., Boers, M., & Cella, D. (2012). Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: Perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 21(5), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8CrossRefPubMed

77.

Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 12(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023254226592CrossRefPubMed

78.

Ocloo, J., Garfield, S., Franklin, B. D., & Dawson, S. (2021). Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: A systematic review of reviews. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Manafo, E., Petermann, L., Mason-Lai, P., & Vandall-Walker, V. (2018). Patient engagement in Canada: A scoping review of the ‘how’and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 1–11.

80.

Hewlett, S. A. (2003). Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 30(4), 877–879.PubMed

81.

Rastogi, R., Davis, A. M., & Chesworth, B. M. (2007). A cross-sectional look at patient concerns in the first six weeks following primary total knee arthroplasty. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Kennedy, D. M., Stratford, P. W., Riddle, D. L., Hanna, S. E., & Gollish, J. D. (2008). Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty. Physical Therapy, 88(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070051CrossRefPubMed

83.

Aiyegbusi, O. L., Cruz Rivera, S., Roydhouse, J., Kamudoni, P., Alder, Y., Anderson, N., Baldwin, R. M., Bhatnagar, V., Black, J., Bottomley, A., Brundage, M., Cella, D., Collis, P., Davies, E. H., Denniston, A. K., Efficace, F., Gardner, A., Gnanasakthy, A., Golub, R. M., … Calvert, M. J. (2024). Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment. Nature Medicine, 30(3), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9CrossRefPubMed

84.

Aiyegbusi, O. L., Roydhouse, J., Rivera, S. C., Kamudoni, P., Schache, P., Wilson, R., Stephens, R., & Calvert, M. (2022). Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. Nature Communications, 13(1), 6026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33826-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

85.

Gossec, L., Kirwan, J., & De Wit, M. (2013). Patient perspective in outcome measures developed by OMERACT. Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 8(Suppl 2), S17–S22.CrossRef

Titel: Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
Auteurs: Motahareh Karimijashni
Shokoofih Abbasalipour
Marie Westby
Tim Ramsay
Paul E. Beaulé
Stéphane Poitras
Publicatiedatum: 27-01-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03899-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen