Top

Gepubliceerd in:

27-11-2021

Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version

Auteurs: Yolanda Andreu Vaillo, Andrea Conchado Peiró, Paula Martinez Lopez, María Teresa Martinez Martinez, Pilar Moreno, Leoncio Arribas Alpuente

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2022

Abstract

Purpose

Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale is one of the most commonly used and validated measures to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in this population. However, there are some aspects related to its structure that still deserve consideration. The aim of this study was to test the substantive improvement over the original QLACS structure resulting from several proposals reflected in the literature.

Method

Using a cross-sectional design and Confirmatory Factorial Analysis, we explored those proposals. Reliability, convergent validity, and factor invariance across three cancer survivorships phases (re-entry, early, and long term) were also analyzed. 1.862 post-treatment survivors of diverse cancer types completed the Spanish versions of QLACS, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), and Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS).

Results

The original model with twelve domains, grouped (with the exception of benefits) into a single total score, versus two subtotal (Generic and Cancer-specific) obtained a good fit. The values of Cronbach’s alpha, Composite reliability, Average Variance Extracted indexes, and Pearson correlations supported the internal consistency and temporal stability (interval of 2–3 weeks) of the QLACS. Results also showed its adequate convergent validity and an invariant factor structure across survival periods (re-entry survivorship, early survivorship, long-term survivorship).

Conclusion

In its original structure, albeit the replacement of the scores on the two subscales by a total score, our results support QLACS as a valid and useful tool for the assessment of HRQoL in post-treatment cancer survivors throughout the different survival phases.

vorige artikel Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

volgende artikel Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire: validation study of the Serbian version

Admiraal, J. M., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M., Schröder, C. P., Tuinier, W., Hospers, G. A. P., & Reyners, A. K. L. (2020). Distress, problems, referral wish, and supportive health care use in breast cancer survivors beyond the first year after chemotherapy completion. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(7), 3023–3032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05030-6CrossRefPubMed

Duijts, S. F. A., van Egmond, M. P., Spelten, E., van Muijen, P., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 23(5), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3467CrossRefPubMed

Harrington, C. B., Hansen, J. A., Moskowitz, M., Todd, B. L., & Feuerstein, M. (2010). It’s not over when it’s over: Long-term symptoms in cancer survivors—a systematic review. International Journal Psychiatry Medicine, 40(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.2190/PM.40.2.cCrossRef

Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Mariotto, A. B., Rowland, J. H., Yabroff, K. R., Alfano, C. M., Jemal, A., Kramer, J. L., & Siegel, R. L. (2019). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565CrossRef

Wiltink, L. M., White, K., King, M. T., & Rutherford, K. C. (2020). Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for colorectal and anal cancer: The extent of recommendations for managing long-term symptoms and functional impairments. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(6), 2523–2532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05301-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Williamson, T. J., & Stanton, A. L. (2018). Adjustment to life as a cancer survivor. In M. Feuerstein (Ed.), Handbook of cancer survivorship (2nd ed., pp. 29–48). Springer.CrossRef

Cancer Control Joint Action CanCOn. (2018). European Guide on Quality Improvement in Comprehensive Cancer Control. National Institute of Public Health (Slovenia) and Scientific Institute of Public Health (Brussels). https://cancercontrol.eu/archived/uploads/images/Guide/pdf/CanCon_Guide_FINAL_Web.pdf

Martínez, P., & Andreu, Y. (2019). Cancer survivorship: The need for comprehensive care and the importance of assuming an active role. Psychologist Papers, 40(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2885CrossRef

Van Leeuwen, M., Husson, O., Alberti, P., Arraras, J. I., Chinot, O. L., Costantini, A., Darlington, A. S., Dirven, L., Eichler, M., Hammerlid, E. B., Holzner, B., Johnson, C. B., Kontogianni, M., Kjær, T. K., Morag, O., Nolte, S., Nordin, A., Pace, A., Pinto, M., … Vvan de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2018). Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0920-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Gordon, B.-B.E., & Chen, R. C. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivorship. Acta Oncologica, 56(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186x.2016.1268265CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ashley, L., Smith, A. B., Jones, H., Velikova, G., & Wright, P. (2014). Traditional and Rasch psychometric analyses of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire in shorter-term cancer survivors 15months post-diagnosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77(4), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.007CrossRefPubMed

12.

Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078CrossRefPubMed

13.

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., & De Haes, J. C. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute., 85, 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365CrossRefPubMed

14.

Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ganz, P. A., Desmond, K. A., Leedham, B., Rowland, J. H., Meyerowitz, B. E., & Belin, T. R. (2002). Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: A follow-up study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.1.39CrossRefPubMed

16.

Zebrack, B. J., Ganz, P. A., Bernaards, C. A., Petersen, L., & Abraham, L. (2006). Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 15(5), 407–421.CrossRef

17.

Zhao, L., Portier, K., Stein, K., Baker, F., & Smith, T. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis of the Cancer Problems in Living Scale: A report from the American Cancer Society’s Studies of Cancer Survivors. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 37(4), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.04.011CrossRefPubMed

18.

Avis, N. E., Smith, K. W., McGraw, S., Smith, R. G., Petronis, V. M., & Carver, C. S. (2005). Assessing quality of life in adult cancer survivors (QLACS). Quality of Life Research, 14(4), 1007–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-2147-2CrossRefPubMed

19.

Gotay, C. C., Korn, E. L., McCabe, M. S., Moore, T. D., & Cheson, B. D. (1992). Quality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: Research issues in protocol development. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84(8), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.8.575CrossRefPubMed

20.

Geerse, O. P., Wynia, K., Kruijer, M., Schotsman, M. J., Hiltermann, T. J. N., & Berendsen, A. J. (2017). Health-related problems in adult cancer survivors: Development and validation of the Cancer Survivor Core Set. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25(2), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3439-0CrossRefPubMed

21.

Jacobsen, P. B., & Jim, H. S. L. (2011). Consideration of quality of life in cancer survivorship research. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 20(10), 2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0563CrossRef

22.

Muzzatti, B., & Annunziata, M. A. (2013). Assessing quality of life in long-term cancer survivors: A review of available tools. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(11), 3143–3152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1912-6CrossRefPubMed

23.

Avis, N. E., Ip, E., & Foley, K. L. (2006). Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale for long-term cancer survivors in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-92CrossRef

24.

Escobar, A., del Trujillo-Martín, M., Rueda, A., Pérez-Ruiz, E., Avis, N. E., & Bilbao, A. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire: Application in a sample of short-term survivors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0378-2CrossRef

25.

Sohl, S. J., Levine, B., & Avis, N. E. (2015). Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale for early post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research, 24(1), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0749-xCrossRefPubMed

26.

Stanton, A. L. (2012). What happens now? Psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(11), 1215–1220. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7406CrossRefPubMed

27.

Stanton, A., Rowland, J. H., & Ganz, P. A. (2015). Life after diagnosis and treatment of cancer in adulthood: Contributions from psychosocial oncology research. American Psychological Association, 70(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037875CrossRef

28.

Derogatis, L. R. (2013). Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) Manual. NCS Pearson, Inc.

29.

Galdón, M. J., Durá, E., Andreu, Y., Ferrando, M., Murgui, S., Pérez, S., & Ibáñez, E. (2008). Psychometric proprieties of the Brief Symptoms Inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a Spanish Breast Sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65(6), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.009CrossRefPubMed

30.

Martínez, P., Conchado, A., Andreu, Y., & Galdón, M. J. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 in a heterogeneous sample of adult cancer patients. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n1.1CrossRef

31.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041CrossRef

32.

Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). The subjective happiness scale: Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119(473–481), 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0497-2CrossRef

33.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria in fix indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

34.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005CrossRef

35.

Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3CrossRef

36.

Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831CrossRef

37.

Smits, I. A. M., Timmerman, M. E., Barelds, D. P. H., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). The dutch symptom checklist-90-revised. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000233CrossRef

38.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980CrossRef

39.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.

40.

Santin, O., Murray, L., Prue, G., Gavin, A., Gormley, G., & Donnelly, M. (2015). Self-reported psychosocial needs and health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 19(4), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.01.009CrossRefPubMed

41.

Busseri, M. A. (2018). Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 122(1), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.003CrossRef

42.

Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Burns, L. R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(5), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00007-7CrossRef

43.

Victorson, D., Cella, D., Wagner, L., Kramer, L., & Smith, M. L. (2007). Measuring quality of life in cancer survivors. In M. Feuerstein (Ed.), Handbook of cancer survivorship (pp. 79–110). Springer.CrossRef

Titel: Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version
Auteurs: Yolanda Andreu Vaillo
Andrea Conchado Peiró
Paula Martinez Lopez
María Teresa Martinez Martinez
Pilar Moreno
Leoncio Arribas Alpuente
Publicatiedatum: 27-11-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03036-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

Greater mastery is associated with lower depression risk in a large international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over 2.5 years

Open Access

Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Review

Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial

Open Access

Mental health, quality of life and optimism during the covid-19 pandemic: a comparison between Brazil and Portugal

Association amongst social support inside or outside the family and depression symptoms: longitudinal study of urban–rural differences in China

Predictors of EQ-5D-3L outcomes amongst injured Māori: 1-year post-injury findings from a New Zealand cohort study

Open Access

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

Greater mastery is associated with lower depression risk in a large international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over 2.5 years

Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial

Mental health, quality of life and optimism during the covid-19 pandemic: a comparison between Brazil and Portugal

Association amongst social support inside or outside the family and depression symptoms: longitudinal study of urban–rural differences in China

Predictors of EQ-5D-3L outcomes amongst injured Māori: 1-year post-injury findings from a New Zealand cohort study

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Greater mastery is associated with lower depression risk in a large international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over 2.5 years

Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial

Mental health, quality of life and optimism during the covid-19 pandemic: a comparison between Brazil and Portugal

Association amongst social support inside or outside the family and depression symptoms: longitudinal study of urban–rural differences in China

Predictors of EQ-5D-3L outcomes amongst injured Māori: 1-year post-injury findings from a New Zealand cohort study