Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2007 | Original Article

Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: Evidence from motion-induced blindness

Auteurs: Werner Klotz, Ulrich Ansorge

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured in response to the objective offset of a visual disk under two physically similar conditions: (1) visible conditions in which the target disk was well perceived and (2) invisible conditions in which participants reported to have not seen the target because of motion-induced blindness (Bonneh, Cooperman, & Sagi in Nature 411:798–801, 2001). Electrophysiological responses to the physical offset of the target disk were almost completely absent in the invisible conditions (Experiment 2). In the same conditions, the physical offset was almost completely invisible (Experiment 1). Results suggest an augmenting function of prior awareness of a stimulus for the offset-triggered ERP of that stimulus.
vorige artikel The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity
volgende artikel Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis
Voetnoten
1
By “awareness independence” we refer to the relationship between what is currently perceived and the processing of incoming visual information from the field of view. Of course, this does not preclude that the processing of incoming information depends on other aspects of the participants’ awareness besides the content of perception, such as the degree of wakefulness of the observer.
 
2
By this contention, we do not want to argue for a dualistic concept of mind and body, that is, we do not want to say that awareness has its effect on brain processes by means of causes above the physiological brain processes. Instead, the hypothesis of awareness dependence rests on the assumption that there could be brain processes which are uniquely correlated with a particular state of awareness for a specific perceived content so that these awareness-correlated brain processes could be responsible for a difference in the physiological processing of the incoming information.
 
Literatuur
Ansorge, U. (2003). Asymmetric influences of temporally vs. nasally presented masked visual information: Evidence for collicular contributions to nonconscious priming effects. Brain and Cognition, 51, 317–325.PubMedCrossRef
Ansorge, U. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 1123–1148.PubMed
Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937–948.PubMedCrossRef
Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effects of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762–777.PubMedCrossRef
Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 595–606.CrossRef
Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–23.PubMedCrossRef
Bonneh, Y., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Motion induced blindness in normal observers. Nature, 411, 798–801.PubMedCrossRef
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1–36.PubMedCrossRef
Breitmeyer, B. G., Ogmen, H., & Chen, J. (2004). Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 138–157.PubMedCrossRef
Bridgeman, B. (1988). Visual evoked potentials: concomitants of metacontrast in late components. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 401–403.PubMed
Carter, O. L., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception, 32, 295–305.PubMedCrossRef
Chun, M. M., & Marois, R. (2002). The dark side of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 184–189.PubMedCrossRef
Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W., & Heywood, C. A. (2004). Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: The special role of object onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 464–477.PubMedCrossRef
Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Tucker. L. A. (1997). Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density ERP study of the gap effect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 855–865.PubMedCrossRef
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.PubMedCrossRef
DiLollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507.CrossRef
Edelman, G. M. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737–1747.PubMedCrossRef
Fisher, B., & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 553–610.CrossRef
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.PubMedCrossRef
Funk, A. P., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). Does interhemispheric competition mediate motion-induced blindness? A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Perception, 32, 1325–1338.PubMedCrossRef
Gomez, C., Atienza, M., Gomez, G. J., & Vazquez, M. (1996). Response latencies and event-related potentials during the gap paradigm using saccadic responses in human subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 91–99.PubMedCrossRef
Graf, E. W., Adams, W. J., & Lages, M. (2002). Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth-ordering and surface completion. Vision Research, 42, 2731–2735.PubMedCrossRef
Haynes, J.-D., Driver, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron, 46, 811–821.PubMedCrossRef
Hochstoetter, C., Koch, C., & Kiper, D. C. (2004). Motion-induced blindness does not affect the formation of afterimages. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 691–708.CrossRef
Hsu, L. C., Yeh, S. L, & Kramer, P. (2004). Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in. Vision Research, 44, 2857–2866.PubMedCrossRef
Imai, A., & Tsuji, K. (2004). Event-related potential correlates of judgment categories and detection sensitivity in a visual detection task. Vision Research, 44, 763–773.PubMedCrossRef
Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified. Psychological Science, 13, 48–54.PubMedCrossRef
Jeffreys, D. A., & Musselwhite, M. J. (1986). A visual evoked potential study of metacontrast masking. Vision Research, 26, 631–642.PubMedCrossRef
Kaernbach, C., Schroeger, E., Jacobsen, T., & Roeber, U. (1999). Effects of consciousness on human brain waves following binocular rivalry. Neuroreport, 10, 713–716.PubMedCrossRef
Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L. E., Gerbino, W., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2004). Blindness to inconsistent local signals in motion transparency from oscillating dots. Vision Research, 44, 2207–2212.PubMed
Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 120–125.PubMedCrossRef
Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992.CrossRef
Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 58, 92–101.CrossRef
Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 23, 571–579.CrossRef
Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263–269.CrossRef
Macknik S. L., & Haglund M. M. (1999). Optical images of visible and invisible percepts in the primary visual cortex of primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 15208–15210.PubMedCrossRef
Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1990). Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 532–550.
McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168–180.PubMedCrossRef
Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2004). Seeing the disappearance of unseen objects. Perception, 33, 1267–1273.PubMedCrossRef
Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). Forming and updating object representations without awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness. Vision Research, 45, 961–967.PubMedCrossRef
Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Moradi, F., Zandvakili, A., & Esteky, H. (2004). Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness. Perception, 33, 249–254.PubMedCrossRef
Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). Cambridge: MIT.
Niedeggen, M., Wichmann, P., & Stoerig, P. (2001). Change blindness and time to consciousness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1719–1726.PubMedCrossRef
Pavese, A., Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E., & Buxbaum, L. (2002). Limitations of attentional orienting. Effects of abrupt visual onsets and offsets on naming two objects in a patient with simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1097–1103.PubMedCrossRef
Pratt, J., & Hirshhorn, M. (2003). Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, 261–265.CrossRef
Roeber, U., & Schroeger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: A human event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 371, 51–55.PubMedCrossRef
Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346–1360.
Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351–1363.PubMedCrossRef
Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003a). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional explanation. Psychological Research, 67, 184–197.PubMedCrossRef
Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003b). Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming. Acta Psychologica 113, 185–203.PubMedCrossRef
Schiller, P. H., & Chorover, S. L. (1972). Metacontrast: Its relation to evoked potentials. Science, 153, 1398–1400.CrossRef
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention—the effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception& Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
Tong, F. (2003). Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 219–229.PubMedCrossRef
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759.PubMedCrossRef
Treisman, M. (1977). On the stability of ds. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 235–243.CrossRef
van Aalderen-Smeets, S., Oostenveld, R., & Schwarbach, J. (2006) Investigating neurophysiological correlates of metacontrast masking with magnetoencephalography. Advances in Cognitive Psychology.
Vaughan, H. G., & Silverstein, L. (1968). Metacontrast and evoked potentials: A reappraisal. Science, 160, 207–208.PubMedCrossRef
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275–6280.PubMedCrossRef
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets—no special role for onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 583–597.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: Evidence from motion-induced blindness
Auteurs
Werner Klotz
Ulrich Ansorge
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0058-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2007

History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective

  • Original Article

Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast

  • Original Article

The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity

  • Original Article

Experiments on the Fehrer–Raab effect and the ‘Weather Station Model’ of visual backward masking

  • Original Article

Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Original Article

Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis

  • Original Article