Top

Gepubliceerd in:

15-11-2017

Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened

Auteurs: Isaac M. Lipkus, Constance M. Johnson, Sathya Amarasekara, Wei Pan, John A. Updegraff

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 3/2018

Abstract

Data on the public’s reactions to online tailored colorectal cancer (CRC) risk estimates are sparse. We assessed among 560 men and women aged 50–75 with no CRC screening history reactions to online tailored CRC estimated comparative risk (i.e., self vs. other their age and sex). Assessed were reactions to estimate (i.e., repeating back estimate, match between perceived comparative risk and estimate, accuracy and usefulness of estimate, emotional reactions), risk appraisals and screening intentions. 73% of the sample accurately repeated back their estimate; the match between perceived comparative risk and the estimate was lowest among those informed of being at higher risk. Higher estimates were viewed as less useful and evoked more negative emotions. Viewing the estimate as more useful and experiencing more negative emotions were related with higher risk appraisals and, in turn, screening intentions. These data indicate that adults at higher comparative risk resist accepting a higher risk status.

vorige artikel Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study

volgende artikel Change in health-related quality of life and social cognitive outcomes in obese, older adults in a randomized controlled weight loss trial: Does physical activity behavior matter?

Atkinson, T. M., Salz, T., Touza, K. K., Li, Y., & Hay, J. L. (2015). Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9668-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Edwards, A. G., Naik, G., Ahmed, H., Elwyn, G. J., Pickles, T., Hood, K., & Playle, R. (2013). Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 28:CD001865. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001865

Emmons, K. M., Koch-Weser, S., Atwood, K., Conboy, L., Rudd, R., & Colditz, G. (1999). A qualitative evaluation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Journal of Health Communication, 4, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107399126904 CrossRefPubMed

Emmons, K. M., Wong, M., Puleo, E., Weinstein, N., Fletcher, R., & Colditz, G. (2004). Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: Correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490425295 CrossRefPubMed

Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2011). Helping patients decide: Ten steps to better risk communication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103, 1436–1443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr318 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fleisher, L., Kandadai, V., Keenan, E., Miller, S. M., Devarajan, K., Ruth, K. J., et al. (2012). Build it, and will they come? Unexpected findings from a study on a web-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.571338 CrossRefPubMed

Han, P. K., Duarte, C. W., Daggett, S., Siewers, A., Killam, B., Smith, K. A., et al. (2015). Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons’ interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 1280–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRef

Jenkins, K. M., & Sheeran, P. Setting an open-mindedness goal improve persuasion: Evidence from three studies of fruit and vegetable consumption (manuscript under review).

John, E. S., John, A. M., Hansberry, D. R., Thomas, P. J., Agarwal, P., Deitch, C., et al. (2016). Colorectal cancer screening patient education materials—How effective is outline health information? International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 31, 1817–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2652-0 CrossRefPubMed

Kim, D. (2004). Validation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index: A prediction tool for individual cancer risk. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00349-4 CrossRefPubMed

Klein, W., Lipkus, I. M., Scholl, S., McQueen, A., Cerully, J., & Haris, P. R. (2010). Self-affirmation moderates effects of unrealistic optimism and pessimism on reactions to tailored risk feedback. Psychology and Health, 25, 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903261970 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lin, J. S., Piper, M. A., Perdue, L. A., Rutter, C. M., Webber, E. M., O’Connor, E., et al. (2016). Screening for colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315, 2576. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3332 CrossRefPubMed

Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157 CrossRef

Martin, L. T., Ruder, T., Escarce, J. J., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Sherman, D., Elliott, M., et al. (2009). Developing predictive models of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1105-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McQueen, A., Vernon, S. W., & Swank, P. R. (2013). Construct definition and scale development for defensive information processing: An application to colorectal cancer screening. Health Psychology, 32, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027311 CrossRefPubMed

Sabatino, S. A., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009 CrossRefPubMed

Senore, C., Inadomi, J., Segnan, N., Bellisario, C., & Hassan, C. (2015). Optimizing colorectal cancer screening acceptance: A review. Gut, 64, 1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081 CrossRefPubMed

Sequist, T. D., Zaslavsky, A. M., Colditz, G. A., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2011). Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.467 PubMed

Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2014). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033065 CrossRefPubMed

Shepperd, J. A., Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (2015). A Primer on unrealistic optimism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414568341 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sherman, D. A., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611003 CrossRef

Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as Feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x CrossRefPubMed

Smith, R. A., Andrews, K., Brooks, D., DeSantis, C. E., Fedewa, S. A., Lortet-Tieulent, J., et al. (2016). Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current screening. CAL A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21336 CrossRef

US Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Screening for colorectal cancer. US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315, 2564–2575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989 CrossRef

Usher-Smith, J. A., Walter, F. M., Emery, J. D., Win, A. K., & Griffin, S. J. (2015). Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Prevention Research, 9, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-15-0274 CrossRefPubMed

Waters, E. A., Sullivan, H. W., Nelson, W., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). What is my cancer risk? How internet-based cancer risk assessment tools communicate individualized risk estimates to the public: Content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1222 PubMedPubMedCentral

Weinstein, N. D., Atwood, K., Puleo, E., Fletcher, R., Colditz, G., & Emmons, K. M. (2004). Colon cancer: Risk perceptions and risk communication. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271647 CrossRefPubMed

Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCaul, K. D., Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146–151.CrossRefPubMed

White, A., Thompson, T. D., White, M. C., et al. (2017). Cancer screening test use—United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, 66, 201–206. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1 CrossRef

Witt, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328 CrossRef

Titel: Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened
Auteurs: Isaac M. Lipkus
Constance M. Johnson
Sathya Amarasekara
Wei Pan
John A. Updegraff
Publicatiedatum: 15-11-2017
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9902-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

Bidirectional mediation of depression and pain intensity on their associations with upper extremity physical function

Change in health-related quality of life and social cognitive outcomes in obese, older adults in a randomized controlled weight loss trial: Does physical activity behavior matter?

Attachment and telomere length: more evidence for psychobiological connections between close relationships, health, and aging

Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study

The effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on wound healing: a preliminary study

Open Access

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

Bidirectional mediation of depression and pain intensity on their associations with upper extremity physical function

Change in health-related quality of life and social cognitive outcomes in obese, older adults in a randomized controlled weight loss trial: Does physical activity behavior matter?

Attachment and telomere length: more evidence for psychobiological connections between close relationships, health, and aging

Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study

The effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on wound healing: a preliminary study

Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Bidirectional mediation of depression and pain intensity on their associations with upper extremity physical function

Change in health-related quality of life and social cognitive outcomes in obese, older adults in a randomized controlled weight loss trial: Does physical activity behavior matter?

Attachment and telomere length: more evidence for psychobiological connections between close relationships, health, and aging

Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study

The effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on wound healing: a preliminary study

Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers