Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus–response integration account

Auteurs: Bruce Milliken, Juan Lupianez

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Stimulus repetition facilitates performance in many experimental contexts. However, an episodic approach to interpreting repetition effects suggests that repetition effects should depend on how stimuli are encoded. In Experiments 1–3, stimulus repetition in a word identification task led to a cost rather than a benefit in performance, but only when the prime was presented for a relatively long duration. One account of these results is that long prime durations allow integration between stimulus and response codes to occur, which in turn can interfere with responding to a following identical target. In Experiment 4, a stimulus intensity based episodic specificity effect that was insensitive to the proportion of repeated trials supported this stimulus–response integration account.
vorige artikel Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice
volgende artikel The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands
Voetnoten
1
Although the fact that no errors occurred on identity match trials might raise a concern that repetition costs in RT are caused by a speed–accuracy trade-off, we think this is unlikely to be the case. In particular, note that errors were most frequent for the shortest ISIs, and we noted that almost all of the errors occurred when participants named the prime word rather than the target word, perhaps anticipating an identity match trial. If these prime perseveration ‘errors’ occurred on identity match trials, they would have been indistinguishable from correct responses and therefore not coded as errors. As such, the tendency for participants to make a very occasional error on mismatch trials but not on match trials does not undermine the RT results on which we have based our theoretical discussion.
 
2
We thank Mike Wendt for pointing out this issue.
 
3
Francis and Milliken (2003) also report a prime duration based change in repetition effect, but in a task requiring line length judgments. Longer duration primes produced larger repetition costs, as in the present study.
 
Literatuur
Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus–response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell, & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83–99.
Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. E. Roschm, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dennis, I., & Schmidt, K. (2003). Associative processes in repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 532–538.PubMedCrossRef
Deschepper, B., & Triesman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27–47.PubMedCrossRef
Fox, E., & deFockert, J. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 798–812.CrossRefPubMed
Francis, L., & Milliken, B. (2003). Inhibition of return for the length of a line? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1208–1221.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.CrossRef
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef
Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research (Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action).
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483–521.CrossRef
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef
Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1 – 17.CrossRefPubMed
Jacoby, L., & Brooks, L. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 18. Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–47). New York: Academic.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.PubMedCrossRef
Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus–response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198 – 205.
Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 402–408.
Leboe, J., Whittlesea, B., & Milliken, B. (2005). Selective and non-selective transfer: Positive and negative priming in a multiple task environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. and Cognition (in press).
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef
Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2005). The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research (Special Issue on: Integration in and across perception and action).
Malley, G. B., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 657–667.
Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777–787.CrossRefPubMed
Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Low-level constraints on high-level selection: Switching tasks with and without switching stimulus/response objects. Psychological Research (Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action).
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85 (3), 207–238.CrossRef
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P., & Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: a re-evaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229.PubMedCrossRef
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.CrossRef
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.CrossRef
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861 – 872.CrossRefPubMed
Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 38. Advances in research and theory (pp.1–44). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Neill, W. T, Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). The persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.PubMedCrossRef
Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2005). Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: Evidence from analyses of sequential Congruency. Psychological Research (Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action).
Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613–623.CrossRefPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1987). Components of visual orienting. In H. Houma, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.CrossRefPubMed
Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & DeHouwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus–response associations as a source of negative priming: Evidence form task switching studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (in press).
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.CrossRef
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206–217.
Strayer, D. L., & Grison, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (1), 24–38.CrossRefPubMed
Taylor, T. L. & Klein, R. M. (1998). Inhibition of return to color: A replication and non-extension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995). Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1452–1456.
Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist verses episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339–363.
Tipper, S. P., Rafal, R., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Starrveldt, Y., Ro, T., Egly, R., et al. (1997). Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1522–1532.CrossRefPubMed
Van Selst, M. A., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 47, 631–650.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, B. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.CrossRefPubMed
Wood, T., & Milliken, B. (1998). Negative priming without ignoring. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 470–475.
Metagegevens
Titel
Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus–response integration account
Auteurs
Bruce Milliken
Juan Lupianez
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0036-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Instruction-induced feature binding

  • Original Article

Hearing lips in a second language: visual articulatory information enables the perception of second language sounds

  • Original Article

Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting

  • Original Article

The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands

  • Original Article

Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions

  • Original Article

Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice

  • Original Article