Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

24-05-2015 | Brief Communication

The development of summary components for the Disablement in the Physically Active scale in collegiate athletes

Auteurs: Megan N. Houston, Johanna M. Hoch, Bonnie L. Van Lunen, Matthew C. Hoch

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The Disablement in the Physically Active scale (DPA) is a generic patient-reported outcome designed to evaluate constructs of disability in physically active populations. The purpose of this study was to analyze the DPA scale structure for summary components.

Methods

Four hundred and fifty-six collegiate athletes completed a demographic form and the DPA. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted with oblique rotation. Factors with eigenvalues >1 that explained >5 % of the variance were retained.

Results

The PCA revealed a two-factor structure consistent with paradigms used to develop the original DPA. Items 1–12 loaded on Factors 1 and Items 13–16 loaded on Factor 2. Items 1–12 pertain to impairment, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. Items 13–16 address psychosocial and emotional well-being. Consideration of item content suggested Factor 1 concerned physical function, while Factor 2 concerned mental well-being. Thus, items clustered around Factor 1 and 2 were identified as physical (DPA–PSC) and mental (DPA–MSC) summary components, respectively. Together, the factors accounted for 65.1 % of the variance.

Conclusions

The PCA revealed a two-factor structure for the DPA that resulted in DPA–PSC and DPA–MSC. Analyzing the DPA as separate constructs may provide distinct information that could help to prescribe treatment and rehabilitation strategies.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Parsons, J. T., & Snyder, A. R. (2011). Health-related quality of life as a primary clinical outcome in sport rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 20(1), 17–36.PubMed Parsons, J. T., & Snyder, A. R. (2011). Health-related quality of life as a primary clinical outcome in sport rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 20(1), 17–36.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Snyder, A. R., Parsons, J. T., Valovich McLeod, T. C., Curtis Bay, R., Michener, L. A., & Sauers, E. L. (2008). Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part I: Disablement models. Journal of Athletic Training, 43(4), 428–436.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Snyder, A. R., Parsons, J. T., Valovich McLeod, T. C., Curtis Bay, R., Michener, L. A., & Sauers, E. L. (2008). Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part I: Disablement models. Journal of Athletic Training, 43(4), 428–436.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vela, L. I., & Denegar, C. (2010). Transient disablement in the physically active with musculoskeletal injuries, part I: A descriptive model. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(6), 615–629.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Vela, L. I., & Denegar, C. (2010). Transient disablement in the physically active with musculoskeletal injuries, part I: A descriptive model. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(6), 615–629.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Vela, L. I., & Denegar, C. R. (2010). The disablement in the physically active scale, part II: The psychometric properties of an outcomes scale for musculoskeletal injuries. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(6), 630–641.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Vela, L. I., & Denegar, C. R. (2010). The disablement in the physically active scale, part II: The psychometric properties of an outcomes scale for musculoskeletal injuries. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(6), 630–641.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London, UK: Routledge. Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London, UK: Routledge.
8.
go back to reference Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics: Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 14(2), 165–168.CrossRefPubMed Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics: Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 14(2), 165–168.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huffman, G. R., Park, J., Roser-Jones, C., Sennett, B. J., Yagnik, G., & Webner, D. (2008). Normative SF-36 values in competing NCAA intercollegiate athletes differ from values in the general population. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 90(3), 471–476.CrossRef Huffman, G. R., Park, J., Roser-Jones, C., Sennett, B. J., Yagnik, G., & Webner, D. (2008). Normative SF-36 values in competing NCAA intercollegiate athletes differ from values in the general population. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 90(3), 471–476.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McAllister, D. R., Motamedi, A. R., Hame, S. L., Shapiro, M. S., & Dorey, F. J. (2001). Quality of life assessment in elite collegiate athletes. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(6), 806–810.PubMed McAllister, D. R., Motamedi, A. R., Hame, S. L., Shapiro, M. S., & Dorey, F. J. (2001). Quality of life assessment in elite collegiate athletes. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(6), 806–810.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The development of summary components for the Disablement in the Physically Active scale in collegiate athletes
Auteurs
Megan N. Houston
Johanna M. Hoch
Bonnie L. Van Lunen
Matthew C. Hoch
Publicatiedatum
24-05-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1007-6