Top

Gepubliceerd in:

20-09-2019 | Original Paper

The Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale: Early Evidence on Validation in an Italian Sample

Auteurs: Alessandro Germani, Elisa Delvecchio, Jian-Bin Li, Claudia Mazzeschi

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 3/2020

Abstract

Objectives

The Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale (INDCOL) is a brief, easy-to-use and good tool to measure individualism and collectivism at individual level. Due to the lack of adequate measures to assess those cultural values in the Italian context and a paucity of research on measurement invariance across groups, the present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the INDCOL in Italian young people. Furthermore, the paper also examined developmental period (adolescents vs. emerging adults) and gender (males vs. females) differences in individualism and collectivism.

Methods

Nine hundred and forty Italian students (14–26 years old; 56.4% adolescents) filled in the 16-item version of the INDCOL and the Family Allocentrism-Idiocentrism scale (FAIS).

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a modified four-factor model of the INDCOL (14-item version). The factor structure was invariant across developmental periods and gender. Each dimension showed acceptable internal consistency. The results of multivariate analysis of variance found that emerging adults scored higher in horizontal collectivism than adolescents. Males scored higher in vertical individualism than females. The INDCOL showed good convergent validity with FAIS.

Conclusion

The INDCOL is a reliable and valid instrument to assess individuals’ individualism and collectivism in the Italian context. These findings contribute to the knowledge about Italian young people’s cultural orientation.

vorige artikel Unidimensionality and Measurement Invariance of the 11-Item Korean CES-D Scale among Examining Parents of Individuals with Cerebral Palsy

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469.CrossRef

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6cn677bx.CrossRef

Biemmi, I. (2015). Gender in schools and culture: taking stock of education in Italy. Gender and Education, 27, 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1103841.CrossRef

Bobbio, A., & Sarricca, M. (2009). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: an Italian adaptation of Singelis et al.’s scale and its relations with conflict management and leadership styles. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16, 209–226. http://www.tpmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/16.4.3.pdf.

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structure: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.CrossRef

Campos, B., Ullman, J. B., Aguilera, A., & Schetter, C. D. (2014). Familism and psychological health: the intervening role of closeness and social support. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034094.CrossRefPubMed

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRef

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: a reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80001-4.CrossRef

Chiou, J. S. (2001). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism among college students in the United States, Taiwan, and Argentina. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 667–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600580.CrossRefPubMed

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefPubMed

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef

Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.CrossRefPubMed

Gouveia, V. V., Clemente, M., & Espinosa, P. (2003). The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish population. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598430.CrossRefPubMed

Guo, X., Schwartz, S. J., & McCabe, B. E. (2008). Aging, gender, and self: dimensionality and measurement invariance analysis on self-construal. Self and Identity, 7, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600926873.CrossRef

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lampridis, E., & Papastylianou, D. (2017). Prosocial behavioural tendencies and orientation toward individualism-collectivism of Greek young adults. International Journal of Adolescence & Youth, 22, 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.890114.CrossRef

Lay, C., Fairlie, P., Jackson, S., Ricci, T., Eisenberg, J., Stato, T., Tefaar, A., & Melamud, A. (1998). Domain-specific allocentrism-idiocentrism: a measure of family connectedness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198293004.CrossRef

Li, F., & Aksoy, L. (2007). Dimensionality of individualism-collectivism and measurement of Triandis and al Gelfand’s scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9031-8.CrossRef

Li, J. B., Lis, A., & Delvecchio, E. (2016). Familism and depressive symptoms among Italian adolescents: the mediating effect of parental attachment. Children and Youth Services Review, 71, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.11.002.CrossRef

Li, J. B., Delvecchio, E., Lis, A., & Mazzeschi, C. (2018). Family allocentrism and its relation to adjustment among Chinese and Italian adolescents. Psychiatry Research, 270, 954–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.036.CrossRefPubMed

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: commenton hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modelling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRef

Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4.CrossRef

Noricks, J. S., Agle, L. H., Bartholomew, M., Howard-Smith, S., Martin, D., Pyles, S., & Shapiro, W. (1987). Age, abstract thinking, and the American concept of person. American Anthropologist, 89, 667–675. https://www.jstor.org/stable/678058.CrossRef

Oppenheimer, L. (2004). Perception of individualism and collectivism in Dutch society: a developmental approach. International Journal odf Behavioral Development, 28, 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000009.CrossRef

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3.CrossRefPubMed

Paquet, S. L., & Kline, T. J. B. (2009). Uncovering the psychometric properties of scales measuring individualist and collectivist orientations. International Journal of Testing, 9, 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050903106859.CrossRef

R. Core Team. (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.

Robert, C., Lee, W., & Chan, K. (2006). An empirical analysis of measurement equivalence with the INDCOL measure of individualism and collectivism: Implications for valid cross-cultural inference. Personnel Psychology, 59, 65–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00804.x.CrossRef

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: an R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.

Sato, T. (2007). The family allocentrism-idiocentrism scale: convergent validity and construct exploration. Individual Differences Research,5, 194–200. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=d0286d5d-350e-49cc-92b2-39cbeb52a063%40sdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=26375670&db=aph.

Shavitt, S., Lalwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_3.CrossRef

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302.CrossRef

Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. L. (2002). Validity of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore, relationships with values and interests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033001001.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169.CrossRefPubMed

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.CrossRef

Van der Vijer, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89.CrossRef

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurment invariance literature: suggestion, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale: Early Evidence on Validation in an Italian Sample
Auteurs: Alessandro Germani
Elisa Delvecchio
Jian-Bin Li
Claudia Mazzeschi
Publicatiedatum: 20-09-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01571-w

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Cross-Informant Discrepancies and their Association with Maternal Depression, Maternal Parenting Stress, and Mother-Child Relationship

Original Paper

Current and Future Perspectives on Children’s Genetic- and Endophenotype-Based Differential Susceptibility to Parenting

Open Access
Review Paper

Parenting Styles and Health Risk Behavior of Left-Behind Children: The Mediating Effect of Cognitive Emotion Regulation

Original Paper

What is Parent Engagement in Early Learning? Depends Who You Ask

Open Access
Original Paper

Parents’ Descriptions of How Their Psychosis Affects Parenting

Open Access
Original Paper

The Relations of Parental Emotion Dysregulation and Emotion Socialization to Young Adults’ Emotion Dysregulation

Original Paper

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

The Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale: Early Evidence on Validation in an Italian Sample

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2020

Cross-Informant Discrepancies and their Association with Maternal Depression, Maternal Parenting Stress, and Mother-Child Relationship

Current and Future Perspectives on Children’s Genetic- and Endophenotype-Based Differential Susceptibility to Parenting

Parenting Styles and Health Risk Behavior of Left-Behind Children: The Mediating Effect of Cognitive Emotion Regulation

What is Parent Engagement in Early Learning? Depends Who You Ask

Parents’ Descriptions of How Their Psychosis Affects Parenting

The Relations of Parental Emotion Dysregulation and Emotion Socialization to Young Adults’ Emotion Dysregulation

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Cross-Informant Discrepancies and their Association with Maternal Depression, Maternal Parenting Stress, and Mother-Child Relationship

Current and Future Perspectives on Children’s Genetic- and Endophenotype-Based Differential Susceptibility to Parenting

Parenting Styles and Health Risk Behavior of Left-Behind Children: The Mediating Effect of Cognitive Emotion Regulation

What is Parent Engagement in Early Learning? Depends Who You Ask

Parents’ Descriptions of How Their Psychosis Affects Parenting

The Relations of Parental Emotion Dysregulation and Emotion Socialization to Young Adults’ Emotion Dysregulation