Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2014

The level of agreement between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports of health-related quality of life in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Auteurs: Yoonjeong Lim, Craig Velozo, Roxanna M. Bendixen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the level of agreement between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) using both classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch analysis.

Methods

A total of 63 boys with DMD and their parents completed the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 child self-report and parent proxy-report of HRQoL, respectively. The data were analyzed using both the CTT (scale-score level) and Rasch analysis (item-level).

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, scale-score level) between children and parents showed good to moderate agreement, although parents consistently underestimated their child HRQoL. In Rasch analysis (item-level), 1 out of 8 items was significantly different between children and parents in the physical health scale. Also, 3 out of 15 items were significantly different between those two groups in the psychosocial health scale.

Conclusions

By applying both scale-score and item-level analyses, our study seeks to broaden the understanding of the discrepancy of the ratings between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports. The findings could provide further information about the decision-making process when selecting therapy and care programs.
vorige artikel Quality of life along the diabetes continuum: a cross-sectional view of health-related quality of life and general health status in middle-aged and older Finns
volgende artikel Comparing self and maternal reports of adolescents’ general health status: Do self and proxy reports differ in their relationships with covariates?
Literatuur
1.
Emery, A. E. (1991). Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases: A world survey. Neuromuscular Disorders, 1(1), 19–29.
2.
Mendell, J. R., Shilling, C., Leslie, N. D., Flanigan, K. M., al-Dahhak, R., Gastier-Foster, J., et al. (2012). Evidence-based path to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Annals of Neurology, 71(3), 304–313. doi:10.​1002/​Ana.​23528.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cyrulnik, S. E., Fee, R. J., Batchelder, A., Kiefel, J., Goldstein, E., & Hinton, V. J. (2008). Cognitive and adaptive deficits in young children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14(5), 853–861. doi:10.​1017/​S135561770808106​X.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Chamberlain, J. S., & Rando, T. A. (2006). Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Advances in therapeutics. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
5.
6.
Bray, P., Bundy, A. C., Ryan, M. M., North, K. N., & Everett, A. (2010). Health-related quality of life in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Agreement between parents and their sons. Journal of Child Neurology, 25(10), 1188–1194. doi:10.​1177/​0883073809357624​.PubMedCrossRef
7.
WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2(2), 153–159.CrossRef
8.
Kaplan, R. M. (1985). Quality of life measurement. In P. Karoly (Ed.), Measurement strategies in health psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Can parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 10(4), 347–357.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5(4), 1–157.PubMed
14.
De Civita, M., Regier, D., Alamgir, A. H., Anis, A. H., Fitzgerald, M. J., & Marra, C. A. (2005). Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: Some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications. Pharmacoeconomics, 23(7), 659–685.PubMedCrossRef
15.
McClellan, C. B., Schatz, J., Sanchez, C., & Roberts, C. W. (2008). Validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory for youth with sickle cell disease. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(10), 1153–1162. doi:10.​1093/​jpepsy/​jsn036.PubMedCrossRef
16.
White-Koning, M., Arnaud, C., Dickinson, H. O., Thyen, U., Beckung, E., Fauconnier, J., et al. (2007). Determinants of child–parent agreement in quality-of-life reports: A European study of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics, 120(4), E804–E814. doi:10.​1542/​peds.​2006-3272.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
18.
Bond, T. B., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
19.
Cremeens, J., Eiser, C., & Blades, M. (2006). Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 58. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-4-58.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999). The PedsQL (TM): Measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Medical Care, 37(2), 126–139.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2001). PedsQL (TM) 4.0: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory (TM) version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39(8), 800–812.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Sheffler, L. C., Hanley, C., Bagley, A., Molitor, F., & James, M. A. (2009). Comparison of self-reports and parent proxy-reports of function and quality of life of children with below-the-elbow deficiency. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American, 91A(12), 2852–2859. doi:10.​2106/​Jbjs.​H.​01108.CrossRef
23.
Wright, B., Linacre, J., Gustafson, J., & Martin-Löf, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
24.
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness (Comparative Study). Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.PubMed
25.
26.
27.
van der Linden, F. A., Kragt, J. J., Hobart, J. C., Klein, M., Thompson, A. J., van der Ploeg, H. M., et al. (2006). Proxy measurements in multiple sclerosis: Agreement between patients and their partners on the impact of multiple sclerosis in daily life. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77(10), 1157–1162. doi:10.​1136/​jnnp.​2006.​090795.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Sprangers, M. A. (2002). Quality-of-life assessment in oncology: Achievements and challenges. Acta Oncologica, 41(3), 229–237.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Davis, E., Nicolas, C., Waters, E., Cook, K., Gibbs, L., Gosch, A., et al. (2007). Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: Using qualitative methods to explain the discordance. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 863–871. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-007-9187-3.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
Metagegevens
Titel
The level of agreement between child self-reports and parent proxy-reports of health-related quality of life in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Auteurs
Yoonjeong Lim
Craig Velozo
Roxanna M. Bendixen
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0642-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2014

Enacted and internalized stigma and quality of life among people with HIV: the role of group identity

Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types

Comparing self and maternal reports of adolescents’ general health status: Do self and proxy reports differ in their relationships with covariates?

Psychosocial determinants of quality of life in parents of obese children seeking inpatient treatment

“We both just trusted and leaned on the Lord”: a qualitative study of religiousness and spirituality among African American breast cancer survivors and their caregivers

Psychometric properties of the eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey based on Spanish outpatients

  • Brief Communication