Top

Gepubliceerd in:

05-04-2019 | Original Article

The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer

Auteurs: Thomas S. Redick, Elizabeth A. Wiemers, Randall W. Engle

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2020

Abstract

Recent work on working memory training has produced conflicting results regarding the degree and generality of transfer to other cognitive processes. However, few studies have investigated possible mechanisms underlying transfer. The current study was designed to test the role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer. Eighty-six young adults participated in a pretest–posttest design, with ten training sessions in between. In the two working memory training conditions, subjects performed an operation span task, with one condition requiring recall of letters on every trial (operation-letters), whereas the other condition alternated between letters, digits, and words as the to-be-remembered items across trials (operation-mix). These groups were compared to an active-control group (visual-search). Working memory, verbal fluency, and reading comprehension measures were administered in pretest and posttest sessions. All groups significantly increased their performance over the ten training sessions. There was evidence of strategy-specific benefits on transfer, such that transfer to working memory measures was higher for the operation-letters group on tasks specifically involving letters, and no differential transfer to working memory tests without letters, to verbal fluency, or to reading comprehension. The results indicate that proactive interference does not appear to play a causal role in determining transfer from working memory training, and instead a strategy account based on stimulus content provides a more parsimonious explanation for the pattern of training and transfer.

vorige artikel Intelligence and working memory: evidence from administering the WAIS-IV to Italian adults and elderly

volgende artikel Shared mechanisms underlying the location-, word- and arrow-based Simon effects

Persson and Reuter-Lorenz (2008) was retracted due to undetected programming issues in the training groups (see Persson & Reuter-Lorenz, 2011). When correcting the programming problem, Persson and Reuter-Lorenz (2011) were unable to replicate the positive transfer results published in their 2008 article.

For one subject in the operation-letters group, there was a power outage halfway through the subject’s 8th training session. For a second subject in the operation-letters group, there was an internet network outage during the subject’s 3rd training session. In order to retain these subjects’ data for the training analyses, we used the highest level the subjects had obtained during the session to that point. Therefore, it would be more accurate to say these subjects completed 9.5 and 9.75 training sessions, respectively.

The operation-mix analysis does not include one subject who completed the entire first training session but the file did not save correctly, resulting in a loss of the necessary recall data from the last trial involving digits as the to-be-remembered items.

The letter 3-back result is one finding with a slight divergence between the ANOVA and ANCOVA results. While the follow-up ANCOVA comparing the operation-letters and visual-search groups for 3-back letter was marginally significant, the 2 × 2 follow-up ANOVA group x session interaction was not significant (Table 4).

Category fluency is the other outcome in which the ANOVA and ANCOVA approaches differ. Although the interaction term from the ANOVA model was not significant, the group effect in the ANCOVA model was significant (Table 3). There are two reasons we do not think real transfer occurred for category fluency, in spite of the significant ANCOVA group effect. First, the within-group paired-samples t tests was not significant for either the operation-letters group, t(29) = 0.833, p = 0.412, g_av = 0.173; operation-mix group, t(26) = − 1.446, p = 0.160, g_av = − 0.251; or visual-search group, t(28) = − 0.663, p = 0.513, g_av = − 0.145. These non-significant changes mean neither training group produced a change that was significantly different from 0. Second, the significant effect was likely driven by the non-significant increase from pretest to posttest for the operation-letters group, and the non-significant decrease from pretest to posttest for the operation-mix and visual-search groups (Table 2), a pattern that might produce statistical significance but is inconsistent with training producing transfer (see Redick, 2015, for further discussion).

Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,22, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x.CrossRef

Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin,128, 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.CrossRefPubMed

Blalock, L. D., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). Proactive interference and practice effects in visuospatial working memory span task performance. Memory,19, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.537035.CrossRefPubMed

Bogg, T., & Lasecki, L. (2015). Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence. Frontiers of Psychology.,5, 1589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01589.CrossRef

Bomyea, J., Stein, M. B., & Lang, A. J. (2015). Interference control training for PTSD: A randomized controlled trial of a novel computer-based intervention. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,34, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities,43(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676.CrossRefPubMed

Bunting, M. (2006). Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,32(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.183.CrossRefPubMed

Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R. A., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,140, 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024695.CrossRef

Carretti, B., Borella, E., Zavagnin, M., & Beni, R. (2013). Gains in language comprehension relating to working memory training in healthy older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,28(5), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3859.CrossRefPubMed

Chein, J. M., & Morrison, A. B. (2010). Expanding the mind’s workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,17(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR17.2.193.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cowan, N. (2016). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24, 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6.CrossRef

Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology,51, 42–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crannell, C. W., & Parrish, J. M. (1957). A comparison of immediate memory span for digits, letters, and words. The Journal of Psychology,44, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1957.9713089.CrossRef

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRef

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546.CrossRef

Dunning, D. L., & Holmes, J. (2014). Does working memory training promote the use of strategies on untrained working memory tasks? Memory & Cognition,42, 854–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0410-5.CrossRef

Emery, L., Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (2008). Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning. Psychology and Aging,23(3), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18, 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.972.CrossRefPubMed

Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science,208(4448), 1181–1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375930.CrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMed

Foroughi, C. K., Monfort, S. S., Paczynski, M., McKnight, P. E., & Greenwood, P. M. (2016). Placebo effects in cognitive training. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,113(27), 7470–7474. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601243113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Foster, J. L., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Draheim, C., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2017). Do the effects of working memory training depend on baseline ability level? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,43, 1677–1689.PubMed

Gathercole, S. E., Dunning, D. L., Holmes, J., & Norris, D. (2019). Working memory training involves learning new skills. Journal of Memory and Language,105, 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.10.003.CrossRef

Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience,6(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1014.CrossRefPubMed

Gropper, R. J., Gotlieb, H., Kronitz, R., & Tannock, R. (2014). Working memory training in college students with ADHD or LD. Journal of Attention Disorders,18(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713516490.CrossRefPubMed

Gunn, R. L., Gerst, K. R., Wiemers, E. A., Redick, T. S., & Finn, P. R. (2018). Predictors of effective working memory training in those with alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research,42, 2432–2441. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13892.CrossRef

Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science,24, 2409–2419.CrossRefPubMed

Huck, S. W., & McLean, R. A. (1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin,82, 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076767.CrossRef

Hussey, E. K., Harbison, J. I., Teubner-Rhodes, S. E., Mishler, A., Velnoskey, K., & Novick, J. M. (2017). Memory and language improvements following cognitive control training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,43(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000283.CrossRefPubMed

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,105, 6829–6833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jolles, D. D., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Training the developing brain: A neurocognitive perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6, 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00076.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jonides, J., & Nee, D. E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience,139(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042.CrossRefPubMed

Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169.CrossRef

Kane, M. J., Poole, B. J., Tuholski, S. W., & Engle, R. W. (2006). Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of ‘executive attention’. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,32(4), 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.749.CrossRefPubMed

Klingberg, T., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2002). Training of working memory in children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,24, 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.6.781.8395.CrossRefPubMed

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology,4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Loosli, S. V., Falquez, R., Unterrainer, J. M., Weiller, C., Rahm, B., & Kaller, C. P. (2016). Training of resistance to proactive interference and working memory in older adults: A randomized double-blind study. International Psychogeriatrics,28(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215001519.CrossRefPubMed

Lord, F. M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin,68, 304–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025105.CrossRefPubMed

Lustig, C., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.199.CrossRef

Lustig, C., Shah, P., Seidler, R., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2009). Aging, training, and the brain: A review and future directions. Neuropsychology Review,19, 504–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-009-9119-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition,27, 759–767. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198529.CrossRef

Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science,11, 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,110, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.40.CrossRefPubMed

Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,18, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0.CrossRef

Nelson-Denny. (1993). Reading Comprehension test. Rolling Meadows: The Riverside Publishing Company.

Oelhafen, S., Nikolaidis, A., Padovani, T., Blaser, D., Koenig, T., & Perrig, W. J. (2013). Increased parietal activity after training of interference control. Neuropsychologia,51(13), 2781–2790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.012.CrossRefPubMed

Payne, B. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2017). The effects of home-based cognitive training on verbal working memory and language comprehension in older adulthood. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,9, 256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Persson, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2008). Gaining control: Training executive function and far transfer of the ability to resolve interference. Psychological Science,19(9), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02172.x.CrossRefPubMed

Persson, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2011). Retraction of “Gaining control: Training executive function and far transfer of the ability to resolve interference”. Psychological Science,22(4), 562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611404902.CrossRef

Redick, T. S. (2015). Working memory training and interpreting interactions in intelligence interventions. Intelligence,50, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.014.CrossRef

Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,28, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.CrossRef

Redick, T. S., & Lindsey, D. R. B. (2013). Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,20, 1102–1113. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0453-9.CrossRef

Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,142, 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029082.CrossRef

Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E. A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2015). What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Educational Psychology Review,27, 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.211.CrossRef

Schwaighofer, M., Fischer, F., & Buhner, M. (2015). Does working memory training transfer? A meta-analysis including training conditions as moderators. Educational Psychologist,50(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036274.CrossRef

Shipstead, Z., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,39, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028467.CrossRefPubMed

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science,22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.CrossRefPubMed

Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24, 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0.CrossRef

Sprenger, A. M., Atkins, S. M., Bolger, D. J., Harbison, J. I., Novick, J. M., Chrabaszcz, J. S., … et al. (2013). Training working memory: Limits of transfer. Intelligence,41, 638–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.013.CrossRef

Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704.CrossRef

Szmalec, A., Verbruggen, F., Vandierendonck, A., & Kemps, E. (2011). Control of interference during working memory updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,37, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020365.CrossRefPubMed

Thompson, T. W., Waskom, M. L., Garel, K.-L. A., Cardenas-Iniguez, C., Reynolds, G. O., Winter, R., … et al. (2013). Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence. PLoS One,8(5), e63614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language,28(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5.CrossRef

Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2011). Variation in verbal fluency: A latent variable analysis of clustering, switching, and overall performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,64(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.505292.CrossRefPubMed

Wiemers, E. A., Redick, T. S., & Morrison, A. B. (2018). The influence of individual differences in cognitive ability on working memory training gains. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0111-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wright, D. B. (2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: When t test and ANCOVA produce different results. British Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X52210.CrossRef

Yoon, J.-S., Ericsson, K. A., & Donatelli, D. (2018). Effects of 30 years of disuse on exceptional memory performance. Cognitive Science,42, 884–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12562.CrossRefPubMed

Young, C. W., & Supa, M. (1941). Mnemic inhibition as a factor in the limitation of the memory span. The American Journal of Psychology,54, 546–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417204.CrossRef

Titel: The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer
Auteurs: Thomas S. Redick
Elizabeth A. Wiemers
Randall W. Engle
Publicatiedatum: 05-04-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01172-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2020

Silent shapes and shapeless sounds: the robustness of the diminished crossmodal correspondences effect in autism spectrum conditions

Open Access
Original Article

Cognitive control processes associated with successful gait performance in dual-task walking in healthy young adults

Original Article

Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: a case study

Original Article

The effects of early schema acquisition on mathematical problem solving

Original Article

Dissociative associative-memory deficit as a function of primacy and recency effects

Original Article

Intelligence and working memory: evidence from administering the WAIS-IV to Italian adults and elderly

Original Article

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2020

Silent shapes and shapeless sounds: the robustness of the diminished crossmodal correspondences effect in autism spectrum conditions

Cognitive control processes associated with successful gait performance in dual-task walking in healthy young adults

Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: a case study

The effects of early schema acquisition on mathematical problem solving

Dissociative associative-memory deficit as a function of primacy and recency effects

Intelligence and working memory: evidence from administering the WAIS-IV to Italian adults and elderly

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Silent shapes and shapeless sounds: the robustness of the diminished crossmodal correspondences effect in autism spectrum conditions

Cognitive control processes associated with successful gait performance in dual-task walking in healthy young adults

Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: a case study

The effects of early schema acquisition on mathematical problem solving

Dissociative associative-memory deficit as a function of primacy and recency effects

Intelligence and working memory: evidence from administering the WAIS-IV to Italian adults and elderly