Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Gepubliceerd in:

01-10-2005

To Test or Not To Test? Moderators of the Relationship Between Risk Perceptions and Interest in Predictive Genetic Testing

Auteurs: Shoshana Shiloh, Shiri Ilan

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 5/2005

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The moderating effects of motivational factors (illness prevention vs. emotional reassurance), regulatory focus (health vs. illness orientations), and cancer anxiety on the relationship between risk perceptions and women's interest in predictive genetic testing for breast cancer were studied among 102 women with no history of breast cancer. Risk perceptions per se were unrelated to testing interests. Perceptions of higher personal risk for developing breast cancer were positively related to women's interest in testing only among women whose dominant motivation was not emotional reassurance, who were not oriented towards ruling-out disease, and who were not highly anxious about breast cancer. These findings pointed to conditions under which risk perceptions may enhance screening behaviors, and other conditions under which they may not.
vorige artikel Health Goal Cognition and Adjustment in Women with Fibromyalgia
volgende artikel Where Perception and Reality Differ: Dropping Out Is Not the Same as Failure
Literatuur
Aiken, L. S., Fenaughty, A. M., West, S. G., Johnsons, J. J., and Luckett, T. L. (1995). Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. Women Health Res. Gender Behav. Policy 1: 27–50.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., Woodward, C. K., and Reno, R. R. (1994). Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 13: 122–129.PubMedCrossRef
American Cancer Society. (1995). Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta.
Audrain, J., Rimer, B., Cella, D., Garber, J., Peshkin, B. N., Ellis, J., Schildkraut, J., Stefanek, M., Vogel, V., and Lerman, C. (1998). Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want? Clin. Oncol. 16: 133–138.
Baum, A., Friedman, A. L., and Zakowski, S. G. (1997). Stress and genetic testing for disease risk. Health Psychol. 16: 8–19.PubMedCrossRef
Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ. Monogr. 2: 324–508.
Blackwood, M. A., and Weber, B. L. (1998). BRCA1 and BRCA2: from molecular genetics to clinical medicine. J. Clin. Oncol. 16: 1969–1977.PubMed
Bowen, D. J., Helmes, A., Powers, D., Andersen, M. R., Burke, W., McTiernan, A., and Durfy, S. (2003). Predicting breast cancer screening intentions and behavior with emotion and cognitions. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 22: 213–232.CrossRef
Brain, K., Gray, J., Norman, P., Parsons, E., Clarke, A., Rogers, C., Mansel, R., and Harper, P. (2000). Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? J. Med. Genet. 37: 197–202.PubMedCrossRef
Braithwaite, D., Sutton, S., and Steggles, N. (2002). Intention to participate in predictive genetic testing for hereditary cancer: the role of attitude toward uncertainty. Psychol. Health 17: 761–772.CrossRef
Cameron, L. D., and Diefenbach, M. A. (2001). Responses to information about psychosocial consequences of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: influences of cancer worry and risk perceptions. J. Health Psychol. 6: 47–59.
Cameron, L. D., and Leventhal, H. (1995). Vulnerability beliefs, symptom experiences, and the processing of health threat information: A self-regulatory perspective. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25: 1859–1883.CrossRef
Crisp, B. R., and Barber, J. G. (1995). The effect of locus of control on the association between risk perception and sexual risk-taking. Pers. Individual Diff. 19: 841–845.CrossRef
Croyle, R. T., Dutson, D. S., Tran, V. T., and Sun, Y. C. (1995). Need for certainty and interest in genetic testing. Women Health 1: 329–339.
Croyle, R. T., and Lerman, C. (1993). Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: cognitive and emotional correlates. Prev. Med. 22: 284–292.PubMedCrossRef
Croyle, R. T., and Lerman, C. (1995). Psychological impact of genetic testing. In Croyle, R. T. (Ed.), Psychological effects of screening for disease prevention and detection. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 11–38.
Cull, A. (1998). Psychological implications of progress in breast cancer genetics: Uncertainties and challenges. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 5: 109–123.CrossRef
Daly, M. B., Lerman, C. L., Ross, E., Schwartz, M. D., Sands, C. B., and Masny, A. (1996). Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behaviour. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 41: 59–70.PubMedCrossRef
Decruynaere, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., and Van den Berghe, H. (1993). Perception of predictive testing for Huntington's disease by young women: preferring uncertainty to certainty? J. Med. Genet. 30: 557–561.CrossRef
Ditto, P. H., and Croyle, R. T. (1995). Understanding the impact of risk factor test results: Insights from a basic research program. In Croyle, R. T. (Ed.), Psychological effects of screening for disease prevention and detection. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 144–181.
Durfy, S. J., Bowen, D. J., McTiernan, A., Sporleder, J., and Burke, W. (1999). Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8: 369–375.
Eiser, J. R., and Cole, N. (2002). Participation in cervical screening as a function of perceived risk, barriers and need for cognitive closure. J. Health Psychol. 7: 99–105.CrossRef
Evers-Kiebooms, G., Welkenhuysen, M., Claes, E., Decruyenaere, M., and Denayer, L. (2000). The psychological complexity of predictive testing for late onset neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers: Implications for multidisciplinary counseling and for genetic education. Soc. Sci. Med. 51: 831–841.PubMedCrossRef
Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., and Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30: 407–429.CrossRef
Gerend, M. A., Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., and Erchull, M. J. (2004). Beyond medical risk: Investigating the psychological factors underlying women's perceptions of susceptibility to breast cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Health Psychol. 23: 247–258.PubMedCrossRef
Green, J., Murton, F., and Statham, H. (1993). Psychological issues raised by a familial ovarian cancer register. J. Med. Genet. 30: 575–579.PubMed
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30: 1–46.
Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., and Miller, G. (1992). Psychological distress and suveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 84: 24–30.PubMedCrossRef
Katapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., and Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev. Med. 38: 388–402.PubMedCrossRef
Kent, G., Howie, H., Fletcher, M., Newbury-Ecob, R., and Hosie, K. (2000). The relationship between perceived risk, thought intrusiveness and emotional well-being in women receiving counseling for breast cancer risk in a family history clinic. Br. J. Health Psychol. 5: 15–26.CrossRef
Kowalski, M. R., Henson, K. D., and Longshore, D. (1997). Rethinking perceived risk and health behavior: A critical review of HIV prevention research. Health Educ. Behav. 24: 313–325.CrossRef
Lerman, C., Biesecker, B., Benkendorf, J. L., Kerne, J., Gomez-Caminero, A., Hughes, C., and Reed, M. M. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision making for BRCA1 gene testing. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 89: 148–157.PubMedCrossRef
Lerman, C., Daly, C., Sands, C., Balshem, A., Lustbader, E., Heggan, T., Goldstein, L., James, J., and Engstrom, P. (1993). Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 85: 1074–1080.PubMedCrossRef
Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C., and Balshem, A. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 87: 286–292.PubMedCrossRef
Lerman, C., and Schwartz, M. (1993). Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Ther. 28: 144–155.
Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 5: 119–186.
Leventhal, H., Safer, M. A., and Panagis, D. M. (1983). The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior. Health Educ. Q. 10: 3–29.PubMed
Marteau, T. M. (1993). Health-related screening: Psychological predictors of uptake and impact. In Maes, S., Leventhal, H., and Johnston, M. (Eds.), Int. Rev. Health Psychol., Vol. 2. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 149–174.
Marteau, T. M. (1995). Toward an understanding of the psychological consequences of screening. In Croyle, R. T. (Ed.), Psychological effects of screening for disease prevention and detection. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 185–199.
McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., Schroeder, D. M., and Glasgow, R. E. (1996a). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 15: 423–429.PubMedCrossRef
McCaul, K. D., and O’Donnell, S. M. (1998). Naïve beliefs about breast cancer risk. Women Health Res. Gender Behav. Policy 4: 93–101.
Meiser, B., Butow, P., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Gaff, C., Harrop, K., Bankier, A., Young, M. A., and Tucker, K. (2000). Psychological adjustment of women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Psychol. Health Med. 5: 378–388.
Michie, S., Weinman, J., Miller, J., Collins, V., Halliday, J., and Marteau, T. M. (2002). Predictive genetic testing: High risk expectations in the face of low risk information. J. Behav. Med. 25: 33–50.PubMedCrossRef
Press, N. A., Yasui, Y., Reynolds, S., Durfy, S. J., and Burke, W. (2001). Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. Am. J. Med. Genet. 99: 99–110.PubMedCrossRef
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J. Psychol. 91: 93–114.
Ronis, D. L. (1992). Conditional health threats: health beliefs, decisions and behaviors among adults. Health Psychol. 11: 127–134.PubMedCrossRef
Saidi, G., Sutton, S., and Bickler, G. (1998). A predictive study of reasons for attendance and non-attendance at a breast screening programme. Psychol. Health 13: 23–33.CrossRef
Salkovskis, P. M., and Rimes, K. A. (1997). Predictive genetic testing: psychological factors. J. Psychosom. Res. 43: 477–487.PubMedCrossRef
Shaw, C., Abrams, K., and Marteau, T. M. (1999). Psychological impact of predicting individuals’ risks of illness: a systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 49: 1571–1598.PubMedCrossRef
Shiloh, S., Jaffe Eini, N., Ben-Neria, Z., and Sagi, M. (2001). Framing of prenatal screening test results and women's health-illness orientations as determinants of perceptions of fetal health and approval of amniocentesis. Psychol. Health 16: 313–325.CrossRef
Shiloh, S., Petel, Y., Papa, M., and Goldman, B. (1998). Motivations, perceptions and interpersonal differences associated with interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among women at high and average risk. Psychol. Health 13: 1071–1086.CrossRef
Shiloh, S., Vinter, M., and Barak, A. (1997). Correlates of health screening utilization: The roles of health beliefs and self-regulation motivation. Psychol. Health 12: 301–317.CrossRef
Smith, K. R., and Croyle, R. T. (1995). Attitudes toward genetic testing for colon cancer risk. Am. J. Pub. Health 85: 1435–1438.PubMed
Tambor, E. S., Rimer, B. K., and Strigo, T. S. (1997). Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am. J. Med. Genet. 68: 43–49.PubMedCrossRef
van der Pligt, J. (1994). Healthy thoughts about unhealthy behaviour. Psychol. Health 9: 187–190.CrossRef
Van der Pligt, J. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour. Br. J. Health Psychol. 3: 1–14.
Van der Pligt, J., and Richard, R. (1994). Changing adolescents’ sexual behaviour: perceived risk, self-efficacy and anticipated regret. Patient Educ. Counsel. 23: 187–196.CrossRef
Vernon, S. W., Vogel, V. G., Halabi, S., and Bondy, M. L. (1993). Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program. Breast Cancer Res. Ther. 28: 173–244.
Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychol. 12: 324–333.PubMedCrossRef
Weinstein, N. D. (2000). Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. Health Psychol. 19: 65–74.PubMedCrossRef
Welkenhuysen, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Decruyenaere, M., Claes, E., and Denayer, L. (2001). A community based study on intentions regarding predictive testing for hereditary breast cancer. J. Med. Genet. 38: 540–547.PubMedCrossRef
Wroe, A. L., Salkovskis, P. M. (1999). Factors influencing anticipated decisions about genetic testing: Experimental studies. Br. J. Health Psychol. 4: 19–40.CrossRef
Wroe, A. L., Salkovskis, P. M., and Rimes, K. A. (1998). The prospect of predictive testing for personal risk: attitudes and decision making. Behav. Res. Ther. 36: 599–619.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
To Test or Not To Test? Moderators of the Relationship Between Risk Perceptions and Interest in Predictive Genetic Testing
Auteurs
Shoshana Shiloh
Shiri Ilan
Publicatiedatum
01-10-2005
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9017-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2005

Where Perception and Reality Differ: Dropping Out Is Not the Same as Failure

Anger as a Moderator of Safer Sex Motivation Among Low-Income Urban Women

Perceived Cognitive Function and Emotional Distress Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Suppressed Hostility Predicted Hypertension Incidence Among Middle-Aged Men: The Normative Aging Study

Fear of Movement/Injury in the General Population: Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of an Adapted Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Health Goal Cognition and Adjustment in Women with Fibromyalgia