Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2010 | Special article

Would SYNTAX have been a positive trial if XIENCE V had been used instead of TAXUS?

A meta-analysis of a first-generation vs. a second-generation drug-eluting stent system

Auteurs: B. E. Claessen, G. W. Stone, P. C. Smits, E. Kedhi, W. J. Kikkert, J. J. Piek, J. P. S. Henriques

Gepubliceerd in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Uitgave 9/2010

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Extract

Contemporary treatment options for coronary revascularisation include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Over the past decades, PCI has evolved from a treatment for single-vessel coronary artery disease into a real alternative to CABG for treatment of complex multivessel coronary artery disease. The design of coronary stent systems has improved continuously since the introduction of the first commercially available coronary stent, the Palmaz-Schatz stent. From the bare metal stent period we have moved into the present era of drug-eluting stents (DES). Many DES are currently available, all composed of similar components (a stent platform, a polymer carrying the drug and a drug). However, their clinical effectiveness differs widely. The Synergy between PCI with TAXUS and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) trial investigated whether PCI with DES (paclitaxel-eluting stents [PES], TAXUS, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was non-inferior to CABG in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease. The primary clinical endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) consisting of death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularisation. In SYNTAX, PCI was inferior to CABG at one year, entirely due to an increased repeat intervention rate. We hypothesised that the use of a superior next-generation DES could reduce the need for repeat intervention after PCI. To investigate whether the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (XIENCE V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, also distributed as PROMUS, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) is superior to the PES we performed a random-effects meta-analysis of the four randomised clinical trials comparing EES with PES for which one-year results have been published. We studied the following safety and efficacy endpoints: death from any cause, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularisation, and definite or probable stent thrombosis by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definitions. In the four trials, a total of 4194 patients were randomised to EES and 2489 patients to PES. Results of the meta-analysis are shown in figure 1. At one year, patients treated with the EES had significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction (risk ratio [RR] 0.57), target lesion revascularisation (RR 0.49), and ARC definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR 0.36). These results could be explained by differences between both DES in the underlying stent platforms, differences in the drug and differences in the polymer eluting the drug (table 1).
Table 1
Differences in stent design between the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES).
Underlying stent platform
Strut thickness
Polymer
Polymer thickness
Drug
Drug release kinetics
Multilink Vision stent, made of L-605 cobalt chromium alloy
81 µm
2-layer poly n-butyl methacrylate and polyvinylidene fluoride hexafluoropropylene copolymer
7.8 mm
Everolimus (1µg/mm2): an analogue of sirolimus, an antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive agent which arrests the cell cycle by activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin
Releases 80% of the drug within 30 days after implantation
EXPRESS2 or Liberté, made of 316L stainless steel
EXPRESS2: 132 µm, Liberté 97 µm
3-layer styrene-isobutylene-styrene copolymer
17.8 mm
Paclitaxel (1µg/mm2): an antineoplastic agent which arrests the cell cycle by stabilisation of microtubules
Burst release in the first 48 hours after implantation, slow release over the next 10 days
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Schatz RA, Palmaz JC, Tio FO, Garcia F, Garcia O, Reuter SR. Balloon-expandable intracoronary stents in the adult dog. Circulation. 1987;76:450-7. Schatz RA, Palmaz JC, Tio FO, Garcia F, Garcia O, Reuter SR. Balloon-expandable intracoronary stents in the adult dog. Circulation. 1987;76:450-7.
2.
go back to reference Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961-72. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961-72.
3.
go back to reference Ruygrok PN, Desaga M, Van Den Branden F, Rasmussen K, Suryapranata H, Dorange C, et al. One year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-eluting stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II study. EuroIntervention. 2007;3:315-20. Ruygrok PN, Desaga M, Van Den Branden F, Rasmussen K, Suryapranata H, Dorange C, et al. One year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-eluting stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II study. EuroIntervention. 2007;3:315-20.
4.
go back to reference Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903-13. Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1903-13.
5.
go back to reference Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, Wassing J, van Mieghem C, Goedhart D, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375:201-9. Kedhi E, Joesoef KS, McFadden E, Wassing J, van Mieghem C, Goedhart D, et al. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375:201-9.
6.
go back to reference Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W, Mastali K, Wang JC, Caputo R, et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1663-74. Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W, Mastali K, Wang JC, Caputo R, et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1663-74.
7.
go back to reference Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344-51. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344-51.
Metagegevens
Titel
Would SYNTAX have been a positive trial if XIENCE V had been used instead of TAXUS?
A meta-analysis of a first-generation vs. a second-generation drug-eluting stent system
Auteurs
B. E. Claessen
G. W. Stone
P. C. Smits
E. Kedhi
W. J. Kikkert
J. J. Piek
J. P. S. Henriques
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2010
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Uitgave 9/2010
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03091813