Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2025 | Research

Binding a stimulus after, but not before, response execution: examining the temporal binding window of event files

Auteurs: Sihan He, Jay Pratt

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2025

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Efficient and flexible responses are essential for successfully interacting with the environment. These interactions require an instantaneous integration of visual stimuli and responses, known as ‘stimulus–response binding’ (SR binding). SR binding is considered part of a holistic temporary representation, the event file, that integrates the stimulus, the response, and the action effect produced by this response. It is commonly assumed that an event file (or at least the SR binding) would end with the execution of the response or its action effect. This, however, has never been directly tested. Here, we tested whether the SR binding can be formed between another temporally close stimulus that people didn’t respond to by implementing a sequence of two stimuli where participants needed to respond only to the first or second stimulus. Our results indicate that a binding between the response and this temporally close stimulus can occur, but only when it’s placed after, and not before, the response execution. This finding suggests that the event file might operate a temporal binding window that is not decisively terminated by the response execution. Further, this insight into the temporal dynamics of the event file highlights the temporal flexibility of the SR binding and, thus, the need for careful consideration of its sub-structures and durability.
Voetnoten
1
We appreciate Brett Cochrane for the conversation about the binding window and durability of event files.
 
2
We’d like to thank Elena Benini for her suggestions on including this analysis as a direct evidence for S-R binding.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000673CrossRefPubMed Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​xhp0000673CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Frings, C., Moeller, B., Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Pastötter, B. (2022). Stimulus decay functions in action control. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frings, C., Moeller, B., Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Pastötter, B. (2022). Stimulus decay functions in action control. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023915CrossRefPubMed Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0023915CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laub, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2018). Dissecting stimulus–response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1474–1488.CrossRef Laub, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2018). Dissecting stimulus–response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1474–1488.CrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492.CrossRef Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492.CrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 1–35.CrossRef Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 1–35.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Binding a stimulus after, but not before, response execution: examining the temporal binding window of event files
Auteurs
Sihan He
Jay Pratt
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2025
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02077-5