Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2012 | Contribution to Special Issue

Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading

Auteurs: Reinhold Kliegl, Michael Dambacher, Olaf Dimigen, Arthur M. Jacobs, Werner Sommer

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The development of theories and computational models of reading requires an understanding of processing constraints, in particular of timelines related to word recognition and oculomotor control. Timelines of word recognition are usually determined with event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded under conditions of serial visual presentation (SVP) of words; timelines of oculomotor control are derived from parameters of eye movements (EMs) during natural reading. We describe two strategies to integrate these approaches. One is to collect ERPs and EMs in separate SVP and natural reading experiments for the same experimental material (but different subjects). The other strategy is to co-register EMs and ERPs during natural reading from the same subjects. Both strategies yield data that allow us to determine how lexical properties influence ERPs (e.g., the N400 component) and EMs (e.g., fixation durations) across neighboring words. We review our recent research on the effects of frequency and predictability of words on both EM and ERP measures with reference to current models of eye-movement control during reading. Results are in support of the proposition that lexical access is distributed across several fixations and across brain-electric potentials measured on neighboring words.
Voetnoten
1
The instruction to keep a constant point of fixation does not preclude fixational eye movements. They contribute to ERPs and may generate interpretative problems under some conditions (Dimigen, Valsecchi, Sommer, & Kliegl, 2009).
 
2
The potential of fixational movements (i.e., microsaccades, drift, and tremor during a fixation) has not been tapped systematically.
 
3
In the following, word N always denotes the location of a critical fixation and word N-1 and word N + 1 are its direct left and right neighbors, respectively.
 
4
This notion of “distributed processing” should not be confused with the distinction between “distributed” (i.e., connectionist) and localist models of word recognition (Jacobs & Grainger, 1994).
 
5
Given the confirmatory logic associated with tests of goodness of fit of path models, it is reasonable to assume that there are alternative models with equally good or even better fit statistics. For details of model development and estimates of path coefficients we refer to the original article.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90(3), 229–241.PubMedCrossRef Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90(3), 229–241.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
go back to reference Dambacher, M. (2010). Bottom-up and top-down processes in reading: Influences of frequency and predictability on event-related potentials and eye movements. PhD Thesis. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. Dambacher, M. (2010). Bottom-up and top-down processes in reading: Influences of frequency and predictability on event-related potentials and eye movements. PhD Thesis. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
go back to reference Dambacher, M., Göllner, K., Nuthmann, A., Jacobs, A., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials and eye-movements. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 46–47. Dambacher, M., Göllner, K., Nuthmann, A., Jacobs, A., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials and eye-movements. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 46–47.
go back to reference Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e5047. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005047. Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e5047. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0005047.
go back to reference Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Dambacher, M., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Simultaneous recording of eye movements and ERPs indicates early access to word meaning in natural, left-to-right reading. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 47. Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Dambacher, M., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Simultaneous recording of eye movements and ERPs indicates early access to word meaning in natural, left-to-right reading. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 47.
go back to reference Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/a0023885. Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.​1037/​a0023885.
go back to reference Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: A possible role for autonomous saccades. Biological Cybernetics, 85(2), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: A possible role for autonomous saccades. Biological Cybernetics, 85(2), 77–87.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist & S. Everling (Eds.), Eye Movements Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist & S. Everling (Eds.), Eye Movements Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6(4), 291–320. Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6(4), 291–320.
go back to reference Graf, R., Nagler, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Faktorenanalyse von 57 Variablen der visuellen Worterkennung (Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213(4), 205–218. doi:10.1026/0044-3409.213.4.205.CrossRef Graf, R., Nagler, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Faktorenanalyse von 57 Variablen der visuellen Worterkennung (Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213(4), 205–218. doi:10.​1026/​0044-3409.​213.​4.​205.CrossRef
go back to reference Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565.PubMedCrossRef Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 819–835). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 819–835). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1531–1549.PubMedCrossRef Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1531–1549.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429.PubMedCrossRef Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 417–429.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221–246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221–246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1311–1334.CrossRef Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1311–1334.CrossRef
go back to reference Jost, K., Hennighausen, E., & Rösler, F. (2004). Comparing arithmetic and semantic fact retrieval: Effects of problem size and sentence constraint on event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 46–59. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00119.PubMedCrossRef Jost, K., Hennighausen, E., & Rösler, F. (2004). Comparing arithmetic and semantic fact retrieval: Effects of problem size and sentence constraint on event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 46–59. doi:10.​1111/​1469-8986.​00119.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.PubMedCrossRef Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 429–455.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 429–455.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45(2), 153–168.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45(2), 153–168.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when: Using word-level and clause-level ERPs to monitor working-memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395.CrossRef King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when: Using word-level and clause-level ERPs to monitor working-memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Kliegl, R. (2007). Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 530–537.CrossRef Kliegl, R. (2007). Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 530–537.CrossRef
go back to reference Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2011). Evaluating a computational model of eye-movement control during reading. In J. H. Wolf (ed.), Models, simulations, and the reduction of complexity. Berlin-New York: Verlag der Akademie. DeGruyter. Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2011). Evaluating a computational model of eye-movement control during reading. In J. H. Wolf (ed.), Models, simulations, and the reduction of complexity. Berlin-New York: Verlag der Akademie. DeGruyter.
go back to reference Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 262–284. doi:10.1080/09541440340000213.CrossRef Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 262–284. doi:10.​1080/​0954144034000021​3.CrossRef
go back to reference Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12.CrossRef Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. doi:10.​1037/​0096-3445.​135.​1.​12.CrossRef
go back to reference Kolers, P. A. (1976). Buswell’s discoveries. In R. A. Monty & F. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kolers, P. A. (1976). Buswell’s discoveries. In R. A. Monty & F. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.PubMedCrossRef Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647.PubMedCrossRef Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17(6), 578–586.CrossRef McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17(6), 578–586.CrossRef
go back to reference McConkie, G. W., Underwood, N. R., Zola, D., & Wolverton, G. S. (1985). Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(2), 168–186.PubMedCrossRef McConkie, G. W., Underwood, N. R., Zola, D., & Wolverton, G. S. (1985). Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(2), 168–186.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 667–682.PubMedCrossRef Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 667–682.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Niedeggen, M., & Rösler, F. (1999). N400 effects reflect activation spread during retrieval of arithmetic facts. Psychological Science, 10(3), 271–276.CrossRef Niedeggen, M., & Rösler, F. (1999). N400 effects reflect activation spread during retrieval of arithmetic facts. Psychological Science, 10(3), 271–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Niedeggen, M., Rösler, F., & Jost, K. (1999). Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: Evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. Psychophysiology, 36(3), 307–324.PubMedCrossRef Niedeggen, M., Rösler, F., & Jost, K. (1999). Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: Evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. Psychophysiology, 36(3), 307–324.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45(17), 2201–2217.PubMedCrossRef Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45(17), 2201–2217.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Picton, T. W., Van Roon, P., Armilio, M. L., Berg, P., Ille, N., & Scherg, M. (2000). The correction of ocular artifacts: A topographic perspective. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 53–65.PubMedCrossRef Picton, T. W., Van Roon, P., Armilio, M. L., Berg, P., Ille, N., & Scherg, M. (2000). The correction of ocular artifacts: A topographic perspective. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 53–65.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1), 1–56.PubMedCrossRef Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1), 1–56.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81.CrossRef Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.PubMedCrossRef Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 191–201.CrossRef Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 191–201.CrossRef
go back to reference Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (Vol. 12, pp. 327–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (Vol. 12, pp. 327–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 520–529. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520.CrossRef Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 520–529. doi:10.​1037/​0096-3445.​136.​3.​520.CrossRef
go back to reference Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157.PubMedCrossRef Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445–526.PubMedCrossRef Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445–526.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 1–21. doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.1.CrossRef Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 1–21. doi:10.​3758/​pbr.​16.​1.​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Roehm, D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Rösler, F., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). To predict or not to predict: Influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1259–1274.PubMedCrossRef Roehm, D., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Rösler, F., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). To predict or not to predict: Influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1259–1274.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rösler, F. (2011). Psychophysiologie der Kognition—Eine Einführung in die Kognitive Neurowissenschaft (Psychophysiology of cognition—an introduction to cognitive neuroscience). Heidelberg: Springer. Rösler, F. (2011). Psychophysiologie der Kognition—Eine Einführung in die Kognitive Neurowissenschaft (Psychophysiology of cognition—an introduction to cognitive neuroscience). Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Scherg, M., & Picton, T. W. (1991). Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, pp. 24–37. Scherg, M., & Picton, T. W. (1991). Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, pp. 24–37.
go back to reference Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9(10), 2195–2200.PubMedCrossRef Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9(10), 2195–2200.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., & Rösler, F. (2004). Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(3), 175–201.PubMedCrossRef Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., & Rösler, F. (2004). Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(3), 175–201.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Streb, J., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language, 70(2), 273–286.PubMedCrossRef Streb, J., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language, 70(2), 273–286.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading
Auteurs
Reinhold Kliegl
Michael Dambacher
Olaf Dimigen
Arthur M. Jacobs
Werner Sommer
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0376-x