Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2012 | Review

Time-course analysis of temporal preparation on central processes

Auteurs: Tanja Leonhard, Daniel Bratzke, Hannes Schröter, Rolf Ulrich

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Participants usually respond faster to a response signal (RS) when this signal is preceded by a warning stimulus than when it is not. A question of theoretical importance is the locus of this facilitating effect within the information processing stream. Recently, Los and Schut (Cogn Psychol 57:20–55, 2008) suggested that temporal preparation acts on central processes while perception of the RS is under way. The present study provides a stochastic model (central preparation model, CPM) based on this hypothesis and presents three experiments testing this model. To track the complete time-course of temporal preparation, the warning signal could either precede or follow the RS. The data show some systematic deviation from the model’s predictions, questioning CPM’s assumption that temporal preparation acts only on central processes. An alternative mechanism of temporal preparation based on the parallel grains model [Miller and Ulrich (Cogn Psychol 46:101–151, 2003)] is discussed.
vorige artikel The mental number line electrified: brain potentials in a numerical flanker task
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Facilitating effects of the WS on RT for foreperiods less than 300 ms are often attributed to phasic alertness rather than to a genuine top-down process of temporal preparation (e.g., Ulrich & Mattes, 1996). In this context, the WS is also often named accessory stimulus rather than WS (e.g., Nickerson, 1973). One may actually question whether this distinction is adequate or not (Los, Knol, & Boers, 2001). Nevertheless, such a distinction is not relevant here and thus we adopt the notation used by Los and Schut (2008).
 
2
According to an alternative view, each grain activated by the WS decrements the criterion value c by one unit. Thus, less RS activation is required for stimulus detection when the WS precedes rather follows the RS. This alternative view, however, makes an equivalent prediction as the one described in the main text.
 
Literatuur
Anderson, J. A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In D. LaBerge & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 27–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Hackley, S. A., & Ulrich, R. (2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 536–542.CrossRef
Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1968). The time-course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 297–300.PubMedCrossRef
Bonin-Guillaume, S., Blin, O., & Hasbroucq, T. (2004). An additive factor analysis of the effect of depression on the reaction time of old patients. Acta Psychologica, 117, 1–11.PubMedCrossRef
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. CrossRef
Bratzke, D., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2009). The source of execution-related dual-task interference: Motor bottleneck or response monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1413–1426.PubMedCrossRef
Broadbent, D., & Gregory, M. (1965). On the interaction of S-R compatibility with other variables affecting reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 61–67.PubMedCrossRef
Burbeck, S. L., & Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117–133.CrossRef
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.PubMedCrossRef
Courtière, A., Hardouin, J., Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C. A., & Vidal, F. (2000). The additive factor method in rat information processing. Behavioural Processes, 50, 113–121.PubMedCrossRef
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
Feller, W. (1971). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27–45.PubMedCrossRef
Jaskowski, P., & Verleger, R. (1993). A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 163–174.PubMedCrossRef
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270.PubMedCrossRef
Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806–817.PubMedCrossRef
Los, S. A., Knol, D. L., & Boers, R. M. (2001). The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. Acta Psychologica, 106, 121–145.PubMedCrossRef
Los, S. A., & Schut, M. L. J. (2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20–55.PubMedCrossRef
Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1089–1097.CrossRef
Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101–151.PubMedCrossRef
Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1454–1471.CrossRef
Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.PubMedCrossRef
Nickerson, R. S. (1970). The effect of preceding and following auditory stimuli on response times to visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 33, 5–20.PubMedCrossRef
Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80, 489–509.PubMedCrossRef
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.CrossRef
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRef
Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.PubMed
Requin, J., Brener, J., & Ring, C. (1991). Preparation for action. In J.R. Jennings & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 357–448). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2010). On the locus of temporal preparation: Enhancement of pre-motor processes? In A. C. Nobre & J.T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 227–241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sanders, A.F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sanders, L. D., & Astheimer, L. B. (2008). Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 732–742.CrossRef
Simon, J. R., & Slaviero, D. P. (1975). Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown pocedure on simple and choice reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 9–14.
Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Spijkers, W. A. C. (1990). The relation between response-specificity, S–R compatibility, foreperiod duration and muscle-tension in a target aiming task. Acta Psychologica, 261–277.
Steinborn, M., Rolke, B., Bratzke, D., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. Acta Psychologica, 129, 297–307.PubMedCrossRef
Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147–246.PubMedCrossRef
Tandonnet, C., Burle, B., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2003). The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2376–2384.PubMedCrossRef
The MathWorks (2007). MATLAB - The language of technical computing. MA:Natick.
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.CrossRef
Treisman, A.M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 201–237.PubMedCrossRef
Ulrich, R. (2009). Uncovering unobservable cognitive mechanisms: The contribution of mathematical models. In F. Rösler, C. Ranganath, B. Röder, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Neuroimaging of human memory: Linking cognitive processes to neural systems (pp. 25–41). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 972–990.PubMedCrossRef
Woodrow, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.), The Psychological Monographs (Vol. 76, pp. 16–65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Company.
Metagegevens
Titel
Time-course analysis of temporal preparation on central processes
Auteurs
Tanja Leonhard
Daniel Bratzke
Hannes Schröter
Rolf Ulrich
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0364-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2012

Ideomotor silence: the case of complete paralysis and brain–computer interfaces (BCI)

  • Review

Assimilation and contrast: the two sides of specific interference between action and perception

  • Review

“I” and the brain

  • Review

How to reconcile brain and mind?

  • Editorial

The convergent evolution of neural substrates for cognition

  • Review

Mind and movement

  • Review