Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency

Auteurs: Chris Oriet, Biljana Stevanovski, Pierre Jolicœur

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2007

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Targets are identified more poorly when presented during a congruent cued response than during an incongruent cued response (blindness effect). The authors investigated sequential trial dependencies in the blindness effect. The results show that the size of the blindness effect depends both on the previous cued response-target congruency relationship and on repetition of events from the preceding trial. This finding suggests that cued responses and targets become linked together in a single episodic trace; repeating one of these events from the preceding trial activates the other. Depending on whether the activated representation matches or conflicts with events on the current trial, target identification performance is either facilitated or impaired. Implications for action planning and feature binding are discussed.
vorige artikel Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions
volgende artikel Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice
Voetnoten
1
Cued response repetition is confounded with target repetition, so it was not possible to analyze both these factors within a single analysis. We chose to include cued response repetition as a factor, rather than target repetition, because it is easier to understand how cued responses can reactivate previous targets and influence subsequent target representation than it is to understand how targets can reactivate previous cued responses and then influence identification of themselves. We do not, however, exclude this latter possibility, and we discuss two possible ways in which target repetition could influence identification performance.
 
2
We thank Jochen Müsseler for directing our attention to this possibility.
 
Literatuur
Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 107 – 132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Caessens, B. & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 111, 44 – 57.CrossRef
Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX.
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J, Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.CrossRef
Hommel, B., Proctor, R. L., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1 – 17.CrossRef
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 110, 306 – 340.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of Attention. (pp. 29 – 61). New York: Academic.
Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: Evaluating a stimulus–response integration account. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
Milliken, B., Lupiañez, J., Debner, J., & Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1384–1402.CrossRef
Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks (Abstract). Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861 – 872.CrossRef
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125 – 129.
Müsseler, J., Wühr, P, & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743 – 767.CrossRef
Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 137–154.CrossRefPubMed
Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., Jolicœur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (2003). Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 11–22.PubMed
Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 613–623.CrossRef
Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1–17.CrossRef
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206–217.
Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility. Reaction time as a function of ear–hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.
Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65–74.PubMed
Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431–440.CrossRef
Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (in press). Relative contributions of conceptual and response-related activation in blindness to congruent stimuli. Visual Cognition.
Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.CrossRef
Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 538–552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.CrossRefPubMed
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed
Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX–XX.
Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1260–1270.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: evidence from analyses of sequential congruency
Auteurs
Chris Oriet
Biljana Stevanovski
Pierre Jolicœur
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2007
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0034-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2007

Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting

  • Original Article

Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus–response integration account

  • Original Article

Instruction-induced feature binding

  • Original Article

Hearing lips in a second language: visual articulatory information enables the perception of second language sounds

  • Original Article

Outsourcing control to the environment: effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection

  • Original Article

Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions

  • Original Article