Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2009 | Original Article

Memory for words location in writing

Auteurs: Nathalie Le Bigot, Jean-Michel Passerault, Thierry Olive

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated memory for words location after writing a text. Experiment 1 demonstrated the existence of a memory for words location in writing by showing that participants who first composed a text and were then asked to locate words extracted from their text performed above a chance level established using a computer simulation, and better than participants who did not compose a text but were told the subject of the text. Experiment 2 showed that memory for words location in writing is mainly supported by a visuospatial representation of the text, as indicated by the lower recall of words location by participants who performed a visuospatial concurrent task at the time of the composition, compared with participants who performed a verbal concurrent task. The findings highlight the role of a spatial representation of the physical layout of the text and the role of such a memory in the writing process.
vorige artikel Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object
volgende artikel Automatic mode of acquisition of spatial sequences in a serial reaction time paradigm
Voetnoten
1
Although the composition was limited in space, given that it was not time-limited, memory for words location may have been affected by difference in the number of words of the texts (minimum = 97; maximum = 176). To test that possibility, we correlated recall of location with the number of words produced. No significant relation was found between recall of location and length of the texts (r = −0.25, P = 0.17) indicating that memory for words location did not depend on the number of words produced. Effective recall could also depend on spatial location of the words on the page. For instance, first and last words may be recalled better than words occupying the “middle” region on the page. We tested this possibility by grouping the three first, middle and last words on the page in the Production condition. Then we conducted a repeated measure ANOVA on scores of recall with Location on the paper (beginning, middle, end) as a within-participant factor. The location factor did not affect recall of words location, F(2, 58) = 1.15, MSE = 0.77, P = 0.32.
 
2
As in Experiment 1, memory for words location may have been affected by difference in the number of words of the texts. No significant correlation was obtained between number of words in the texts and scores of recall, r = −0.03, P = 0.76. We also conducted an analysis of covariance on scores of recall with number of words as a covariate and with Concurrent task as the between-participant factor. The visuospatial concurrent task affected memory for words location even when length of the texts was controlled, F(2, 86) = 3.44, MSE = 2.40,  P< 0.05. To test the possibility that effective recall could depend on spatial location of the words on the page, we again conducted a mixed 3 (Concurrent task) × 3 (Location on the paper) ANOVA on scores of recall. The location factor did not affect memory for words location and did not interact with the different types of concurrent task. Finally, we also tested whether difference in memory for words location came from a difference in frequency of the words that were recalled in the three experimental conditions. Mean frequency of the words did not reliably differ between the verbal (M = 69.3, SD = 53.8), visuospatial (M = 65.5, SD = 45.3) and control conditions (M = 65.2, SD = 43.7), F(2, 87) = 0.07, MSE = 2286.3, P = 0.92.
 
Literatuur
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 143–155.CrossRef
Bond, S. J., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Cues people use to paragraph text. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 147–167.
Christie, J. M., & Just, M. A. (1976). Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 702–710.CrossRef
Fischer, M. H. (2000). Perceiving spatial attributes of print. In A. Kennedy, R. Raddach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 89–117). New York: Elsevier.CrossRef
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.CrossRef
Galbraith, D., Ford, S., Walker, G., & Ford, J. (2005). The contribution of different components of working memory to knowledge transformation during writing. Educational Studies in Language and Litterature, 5, 113–145.CrossRef
Greenwald, A. G., & Johnson, M. M. (1989). The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues. Memory and Cognition, 17, 673–681.
Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22–35.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy, & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2005). Memory for words location during reading: Eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise. Memory and Cognition, 33, 447–461.
Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 649–667.CrossRef
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy, & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382–397.PubMedCrossRef
Kennedy, A. (1992). The spatial coding hypothesis. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 379–396). New York: Springer.
Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Spatial Coding and reading: Some comments on Monk (1985). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 649–671.
Klauer, K. C., & Zhao, Z. (2004). Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 355–381.CrossRef
Logan, G. D. (1998). What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1720–1736.PubMedCrossRef
Lovelace, E. A., & Southall, S. D. (1983). Memory for words in prose and their locations on the page. Memory and Cognition, 11, 429–434.
Marsh, E. J. (2006). When does generation enhance memory for location? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1216–1220.PubMedCrossRef
Marsh, E. J., Edelman, G., & Bower, G. H. (2001). Demonstration of a generation effect in context memory. Memory and Cognition, 29, 798–805.
O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., & Bentley, R. (1999). Supporting memory for spatial location while reading from small displays. In: Proceedings of the Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 220–221). Pittsburgh, PA.
Olive, T. (2004). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidences from the dual-task technique. European Psychologist, 9(1), 32–42.CrossRef
Olive, T., Kellogg, R. T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory demands during text composition. Manuscript submitted to publication.
Passerault, J. M., & Dinet, J. (2000). The role of visuo-spatial sketchpad in the written production of descriptive and argumentative texts. Current Psychology Letters, 3, 31–42.
Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y., & Thunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 565–589.CrossRef
Rawson, K. A., & Miyake, A. (2002). Does relocating information in text depend on verbal or visuo-spatial abilities? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 801–806.PubMed
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 608–613.CrossRef
Therriault, D. J., & Raney, G. E. (2002). The representation and comprehension of place-on-the-page and text sequence memory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 117–134.CrossRef
Zechmeister, E. B., & McKillip, J. (1972). Recall of place on the page. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 446–453.CrossRef
Zechmeister, E. B., McKillip, J., Pasko, S., & Bespalec, D. (1975). Visual memory for place on the page. The Journal of General Psychology, 92, 43–52.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Memory for words location in writing
Auteurs
Nathalie Le Bigot
Jean-Michel Passerault
Thierry Olive
Publicatiedatum
01-01-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0135-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2009

Does contingency awareness mediate the influence of emotional learning on the cueing of visual attention?

  • Original Article

Microsaccadic responses in a bimodal oddball task

  • Original Article

Editorial

  • Open Access
  • Editorial

Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination

  • Original Article

Automatic mode of acquisition of spatial sequences in a serial reaction time paradigm

  • Original Article

Incidental learning of abstract rules for non-dominant word orders

  • Original Article