Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

26-11-2021

Single item self-rated general health: SF-36 based observations from 16,910 spine surgery procedures

Auteurs: Anders Joelson, Fredrik Strömqvist, Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson, Jan Karlsson

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2022

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

In spine surgery single item patient-reported outcome assessment has been used for many years. Items 1 and 2 of SF-36 are used for assessment of general health. We used these items to explore single item, self-rated, general health assessment after spine surgery.

Methods

Patients operated for lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis between 2007 and 2017, were recruited from the national Swedish spine register. A total of 16,910 procedures were eligible for analysis. The responsiveness of the SF-36 general health assessment items to surgical treatment was evaluated with the standardized response mean (SRM). Improvement in self-rated general health was used to dichotomize SF-36 profiles and EQ VAS distributions.

Results

For disc herniation, 5852 (83%) patients reported improvement in general health 1 year after surgery. For spinal stenosis, the corresponding numbers were 6,482 (66%). The additional improvement after year 1 was small. The responsiveness of the SF-36 item 2 (the health transition item) to surgical treatment of disc herniation or spinal stenosis was substantial. There was a clear association between improvement in SF-36 item 2 and improvements in all domains of SF-36.

Conclusions

Surgery for disc herniation or spinal stenosis improve patients’ perception of general health 1 year after surgery. The improvement in general health after year 1 is limited. The SF-36 item 2 is a responsive measure of self-rated general health that may be used for dichotomization of SF-36 and EQ VAS data when evaluating surgical outcome in spine surgery.
vorige artikel Quality of life in first episode psychosis: a cluster analytic approach
volgende artikel Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.CrossRef
2.
DeSalvo, K. B., Bloser, N., Reynolds, K., He, J., & Muntner, P. (2006). Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question: A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med, 21(3), 267–275.CrossRef
3.
Sternhagen Nielsen, A. B., Siersma, V., Hiort, L. C., Drivsholm, T., Kreiner, S., & Hollnagel, H. (2008). Self-rated general health among 40-year-old danes and its association with all-cause mortality at 10-, 20-, and 29 years’ follow-up. Scand J Public Health, 36(1), 3–11.CrossRef
4.
Fritzell, P., Hägg, O., Wessberg, P., Nordwall, A., Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. (2001). 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine, 26(23), 2521–2532.CrossRef
5.
Hägg, O., Fritzell, P., Odén, A., Nordwall, A., Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. (2002). Simplifying outcome measurement: Evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine, 27(11), 1213–1222.CrossRef
6.
Parai, C., Hägg, O., Lind, B., & Brisby, H. (2018). The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: An evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients. European Spine Journal, 27(3), 554–563.CrossRef
7.
Austevoll, I. M., Gjestad, R., Grotle, M., Solberg, T., Brox, J. I., Hermansen, E., Rekeland, F., Indrekvam, K., Storheim, K., & Hellum, C. (2019). Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1), 31.CrossRef
8.
Waisbrod, G., Mannion, A. F., Fekete, T. F., Kleinstueck, F., Jeszenszky, D., & Haschtmann, D. (2019). Surgical training in spine surgery: Safety and patient-rated outcome. European Spine Journal, 28(4), 807–816.CrossRef
9.
Kamper, S. J., Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Knol, D. L., Maher, C. G., de Vet, H. C. W., & Hancock, M. J. (2010). Global perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 760–766.CrossRef
10.
Fischer, D., Stewart, A. L., Bloch, D. A., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Holman, H. (1999). Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA, 282(12), 1157–1162.CrossRef
11.
Guyatt, G. H., Norman, G. R., Juniper, E. F., & Griffith, L. E. (2002). A critical look at transition ratings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(9), 900–908.CrossRef
12.
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415.CrossRef
13.
Mouelhi, Y., Jouve, E., Castelli, C., & Gentile, S. (2020). How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? review of anchors and methods. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 136.CrossRef
14.
Thygesen, L. C., & Ersbøll, A. K. (2014). When the entire population is the sample: Strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. European Journal of Epidemiology, 29(8), 551–558.CrossRef
15.
Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–83.CrossRef
16.
Strömqvist, B., Fritzell, P., Hägg, O., Jönsson, B., Sandén, B., Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. (2013). Swespine: The Swedish spine register: The 202 report. European Spine Journal, 22(4), 953–74.CrossRef
17.
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 health survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1349–58.CrossRef
18.
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., Taft, C., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2002). Swedish SF-36 manual and interpretation guide (2nd ed.). Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
19.
EuroQol Group. (1990). Euroqol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef
20.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2015). Statistics notes: Bootstrap resampling methods. BMJ, 350, h2622.CrossRef
21.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2016). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (3rd ed.). Wiley.
22.
Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall.
23.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Parai, C., Hägg, O., Lind, B., & Brisby, H. (2019). Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-proms stabilize after 1 year: An equivalence study based on swespine data. European Spine Journal, 28(9), 2187–2197.CrossRef
25.
Hansson, T., Hansson, E., & Malchau, H. (2008). Utility of spine surgery: A comparison of common elective orthopaedic surgical procedures. Spine, 33(25), 2819–2830.CrossRef
26.
Carreon, L. Y., Berven, S. H., Djurasovic, M., Bratcher, K. R., & Glassman, S. D. (2013). The discriminative properties of the SF-6D compared with the SF-36 and ODI. Spine, 38(1), 60–64.CrossRef
27.
Kosinski, M., Zhao, S. Z., Dedhiya, S., Osterhaus, J. T., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2000). Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 43(7), 1478–1487.CrossRef
28.
Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2005). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 13(12), 1076–1083.CrossRef
29.
Escobar, A., Quintana, J. M., Bilbao, A., Aróstegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2007). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 15(3), 273–280.CrossRef
30.
Alhaug, O. K., Dolatowski, F. C., Solberg, T. K., & Lønne, G. (2021). Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. A prospective national spine registry observational study. Spine Journal, 21(9), 1489–1496.CrossRef
31.
Werner, D. A. T., Grotle, M., Gulati, S., Austevoll, I. M., Lønne, G., Nygaard, Ø. P., & Solberg, T. K. (2017). Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A multicenter observational study based on data from the norwegian registry for spine surgery. European Spine Journal, 26(10), 2650–2659.CrossRef
32.
Grovle, L., Haugen, A. J., Hasvik, E., Natvig, B., Brox, J. I., & Grotle, M. (2014). Patients’ ratings of global perceived change during 2 years were strongly influenced by the current health status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 508–515.CrossRef
33.
Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Dziedzic, K., & Dawes, P. T. (2002). Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: Reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology, 41(12), 1380–1387.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Single item self-rated general health: SF-36 based observations from 16,910 spine surgery procedures
Auteurs
Anders Joelson
Fredrik Strömqvist
Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson
Jan Karlsson
Publicatiedatum
26-11-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03048-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2022

Happiness and depression in psoriasis: a cross-sectional study in Germany

  • Open Access

Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version

Predictors of EQ-5D-3L outcomes amongst injured Māori: 1-year post-injury findings from a New Zealand cohort study

  • Open Access

Correction to: Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: mediators of physical and emotional quality of life in a heterogeneous rare-disease cohort

  • Correction

Association amongst social support inside or outside the family and depression symptoms: longitudinal study of urban–rural differences in China

Greater mastery is associated with lower depression risk in a large international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis over 2.5 years

  • Open Access