Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2009 | Original Paper

Socio-Ecological Predictor Model of Parental Intention to Participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

Auteurs: Yuki Matsumoto, Kate Sofronoff, Matthew R. Sanders

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 3/2009

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

We examined variables associated with parental intention to participate in a parenting program viewed within a socio-ecological framework. In two metropolitan areas in Japan, 222 families voluntarily completed a series of questionnaires. A series of multiple regression analyses was used to evaluate the Socio-Ecological Predictor Model that was able to account for 50% of the variance associated with parental intention to participate in a parenting program. The most significant predictor in the model was program features, which accounted for 30% of the variance. It is important to consider program features that make it more likely that parents will engage positively in a parenting program. We discuss parental intention to participate in a parenting program as well as the limitations of the study and areas for future research.
vorige artikel Girls’ Disruptive Behavior and its Relationship to Family Functioning: A Review
volgende artikel An Exploration of Factors Reducing Recidivism Rates of Formerly Incarcerated Youth with Disabilities Participating in a Re-Entry Intervention
Literatuur
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dadds, M. R., & Powell, M. B. (1991). The relationship of interparental conflict and global marital adjustment to aggression, anxiety, and immaturity in aggressive nonclinic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 553–567. doi:10.​1007/​BF00925820.CrossRefPubMed
Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg child behaviour inventory and Sutter-Eyberg student behaviour inventory—revised: Professional manual. Odess, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology, and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 791–799. doi:10.​1017/​S002196309900409​6.CrossRef
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (2001). The prevention of mental disorders in school-aged children: Current state of the field. Prevention & Treatment, 4, 1–64.
Haggerty, K. P., MacKenzie, E. P., Skinner, M. L., Harachi, T. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2006). Participation in “parents who care”: Predicting program initiation and exposure in two different program formats. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 47–65. doi:10.​1007/​s10935-005-0019-3.CrossRefPubMed
Heinrichs, N., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., & Hahlweg, K. (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behaviour and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 275–287. doi:10.​1007/​s11121-005-0006-1.CrossRefPubMed
Johnston, C. (1996). Parent characteristics and parent-child interactions in families of nonproblem children and ADHD children with higher and lower levels of oppositional-defiant behaviour. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 85–104. doi:10.​1007/​BF01448375.CrossRefPubMed
Karakama, N. (2006, September). Nihonniokeru seikatukakusano kakudaito syakaihosyouno kadai (Widening differences in living standard and issues of social security in Japan). Paper presented at the meeting of the 50th National Economic Statistics Conference on Kakusa shakai to toukei (Differential Society and Statistics), Osaka, Japan.
Kishida, Y., Tamura, T., Kuramochi, K., Kudo, K., & Oikawa, Y. (2006). Ikuji shien puroguramu ni kansuru bunkenteki kento (Literature review about parenting support programs). Tokyo Gakugei Daigaku Kiyo, 57, 381–388.
Kotchick, B. A., & Forehand, R. (2002). Putting parenting in perspective: A discussion of the contextual factors that shape parenting practices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 255–269. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1016863921662.CrossRef
Linehan, M. M. (1999). Development, evaluation, and dissemination of effective psychosocial treatments: Levels of disorder, stages of care, and stages of treatment research. In M. D. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins & interventions (pp. 367–394). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Littell, J. H., & Tajima, E. A. (2000). A multilevel model of client participation in intensive family preservation services. The Social Service Review, 74, 405–435. doi:10.​1086/​516411.CrossRef
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scale (2nd ed.). Sydney, NSW: Families International Publishing.
Luster, T., & Okagaki, L. (2005). Parenting: An ecological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2007). The efficacy and acceptability of the Triple P- Positive Parenting Program with Japanese parents. Behaviour Change, 24, 205–218. doi:10.​1375/​bech.​24.​4.​205.CrossRef
Nock, M. K., Ferriter, C., & Holmberg, E. (2007). Parent beliefs about treatment credibility and effectiveness: Assessment and relation to subsequent treatment participation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 27–38. doi:10.​1007/​s10826-006-9064-7.CrossRef
Ochiai, E. (1997). The Japanese family in transition. Tokyo: LTCB International Library Foundation.
Olson, S., Bates, J., Sandy, J., & Schilling, E. (2002). Early developmental precursors of impulsive and inattentive behaviour: From infancy to middle childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 43, 435–447. doi:10.​1111/​1469-7610.​00035.CrossRefPubMed
Patterson, G., Reid, J., & Dishion, T. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publication.
Poulin, J., & Kauffman, S. (1995). Citizen participation in prevention activities: Path model II. Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 234–249. doi :10.1002/1520-6629(199507)23:3<234::AID-JCOP2290230306>3.0.CO;2-R.CrossRef
Prinz, R. J., Smith, E. P., Dumas, J. E., Laughlin, J. E., White, D. W., & Barron, R. (2001). Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 31–36. doi:10.​1016/​S0749-3797(00)00271-3.CrossRefPubMed
Saito, T. (2005). Nihon no pearentingu koza (Parenting lectures in Japan). Katei Kyoiku Kenkyusho Kiyo, 27, 28–36.
Sanders, M. R. (1999). Triple P- Positive Parenting Program: Towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for prevention of behaviour and emotional problems in children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 71–90. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1021843613840.CrossRefPubMed
Sanders, M. R. (2004). Every parent: A positive approach to children’s behaviour. Camberwell, Australia: Penguin Group.
Sanders, M. R., & Woolley, M. L. (2005). The relationship between global, domain and task-specific self-efficacy and parenting practices: Implication for parent training. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31(1), 65–73.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighbourhood: The science of early childhood. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Snell-Johns, J., Mendez, J. L., & Smith, B. H. (2004). Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers decreasing attrition, and promoting change with underserved families. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 19–35. doi:10.​1037/​0893-3200.​18.​1.​19.CrossRefPubMed
Spoth, R., Kavanagh, K. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2002). Family-centered preventive intervention science: Toward benefits to larger populations of children, youth, and families. Prevention Science, 3, 145–152. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1019924615322.CrossRefPubMed
Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2000). Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: Toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 267–284. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1007039421026.CrossRef
Steele, R. G., Nesbitt-Daly, J. S., Daniel, R. C., & Forehand, R. (2005). Factor structure of the parenting scale in a low-income African American sample. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 535–549. doi:10.​1007/​s10826-005-7187-x.CrossRef
Sutton, C. S., & Dixon, D. N. (1986). Resistance in parent training: A study of social influence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 133–141.CrossRef
Szapocznik, J., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1999). An eco-developmental framework for organising risk and protection for drug abuse: A developmental model of risk and protection. In M. D. Glantz & C. R. Hartel (Eds.), Drug abuse: Origins & interventions (pp. 331–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Turner, K. M. T., Markie-Dadds, C., & Sanders, M. R. (2000). Facilitator’s manual for Group Triple P. Brisbane, Australia: Families International Publishing.
Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0–8 years). Prevention Science, 2, 165–192. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1011510923900.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Socio-Ecological Predictor Model of Parental Intention to Participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program
Auteurs
Yuki Matsumoto
Kate Sofronoff
Matthew R. Sanders
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-008-9227-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2009

Perceived Energy for Parenting: A New Conceptualization and Scale

  • Original Paper

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Diagnosis for Youth from Violent, Impoverished Communities

  • Original Paper

Violence Exposure and PTSD: The Role of English Language Fluency in Latino Youth

  • Original Paper

An Exploration of Factors Reducing Recidivism Rates of Formerly Incarcerated Youth with Disabilities Participating in a Re-Entry Intervention

  • Original Paper

Ambiguous Loss and Posttraumatic Stress in School-Age Children of Prisoners

  • Original Paper

Estimated Risk of Developing Selected DSM-IV Disorders Among 5-Year-Old Children with Prenatal Cocaine Exposure

  • Original Paper