Top

Gepubliceerd in:

12-06-2024 | Empirical Research

Student’s and Classmates’ Prosocial Behavior predict Academic Engagement in Middle School

Auteurs: Nicole R. Brass, ChenYu Hung, Tayla Stephen, Christi Bergin, Chad Rose, Sara Prewett

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 12/2024

Abstract

Students’ academic engagement is greatly informed by a classroom’s social climate. However, more research is needed regarding how specific peer behavior, especially prosocial behavior, come to shape academic engagement. The present study investigated whether students’ perceptions about their classmates’ prosocial behavior were associated with their academic engagement (cognitive, behavioral, affective) across the school year. Indirect effects via increases in students’ own prosocial behavior were examined. Participants were 905 middle school students from rural, low-income communities in the Midwestern United States (50% girls, 46% boys; M_age = 12.94 years). Students completed self-report surveys in the fall and spring of the 2022–2023 school year. Results revealed that students’ perceptions of their classmates’ prosocial behavior were positively associated with students’ own prosocial behavior. Students’ own prosocial behavior was positively associated with all three dimensions of engagement. The positive indirect effect of classmates’ prosocial behavior on engagement through students’ own prosocial behavior was significant. The findings highlight the importance of classmates’ behavior on individuals’ academic engagement and offer insights into classroom-based interventions aimed at improving collective behavior.

vorige artikel Testing the Associations Between Attachment Anxiety, Relational Aggression and Depressive Symptoms in Romantic Relationships: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediator Model

volgende artikel Potential Mechanism Linking Peer Relationships and Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: Mediation of Cognitive Empathy and Moderations of OXTR and DRD2

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Allen, J. P., & Antonishak, J. (2008). Adolescent peer influences: Beyond the dark side. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. (2008-08239-007; pp. 141–160). The Guilford Press.

Armstrong‐Carter, E., Guassi Moreira, J. F., Ivory, S. L., & Telzer, E. H. (2020). Daily links between helping behaviors and emotional well‐being during late adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(4), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12572.CrossRefPubMed

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (1985-98423-000). Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Barry, C. M., & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153.CrossRefPubMed

Bellmore, A. (2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023312.CrossRef

Bergin, C. (2018). Designing a prosocial classroom: Fostering collaboration in students from PreK-12 with the Curriculum You Already Use. WW Norton & Company.

Bergin, C. (2020). Prosocial goals in the classroom. In M. H. Jones (Ed.), Social goals in the classroom: Findings on student motivation and peer relations (pp. 93–110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468452.

Bergin, C., Talley, S., & Hamer, L. (2003). Prosocial behaviors of young adolescents: A focus group study. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00112-4.CrossRefPubMed

Bergin, C., Wang, Z., & Bergin, D. A. (2011). Prosocial behavior in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms. Biennial Meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development.

Brass, N. R., McKellar, S. E., North, E. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2019). Early adolescents’ adjustment at school: A fresh look at grade and gender differences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(5), 689–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618791291.CrossRef

Brass, N. R., Memmott-Elison, M. K., Brockmeier, L., Hung, C., & Bergin, C. (2022). Prosocial behavior and school engagement during adolescence: The mediating role of self-regulation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 83, 101477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101477.CrossRef

Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004.

Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2020). With a little help from their peers: The impact of classmates on adolescents’ development of prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carlo, G., & Padilla-Walker, L. (2020). Adolescents’ prosocial behaviors through a multidimensional and multicultural lens. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12391.CrossRef

Cham, H., Reshetnyak, E., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2017). Full information maximum likelihood estimation for latent variable interactions with incomplete indicators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1245600.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development. (1991-97029-002; pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: Implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303.CrossRef

Dirks, M. A., Dunfield, K. A., & Recchia, H. E. (2018). Prosocial behavior with peers: Intentions, outcomes, and interpersonal adjustment. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, 2nd ed (pp. 243–264). The Guilford Press.

Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., Mastronarde, A. J., Patrick, S. D., Zhang, J., & Druckman, J. (2015). Will not want: Self-control rather than motivation explains the female advantage in report card grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644.CrossRefPubMed

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.CrossRefPubMed

Eisenberg, N., Eggum-Wilkens, N. D., & Spinrad, T. L. (2015). The development of prosocial behavior. In The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 114–136). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.001.0001.

El Mallah, S. (2020). Conceptualization and measurement of adolescent prosocial behavior: Looking back and moving forward. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12476.CrossRefPubMed

Estell, D. B., & Perdue, N. H. (2013). Social support and behavioral and affective school engagement: The effects of peers, parents, and teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 50(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21681.CrossRef

Farrell, A. D., Thompson, E. L., & Mehari, K. R. (2017). Dimensions of peer influences and their relationship to adolescents’ aggression, other problem behaviors and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1351–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0601-4.CrossRefPubMed

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.CrossRef

Fu, X., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Brown, M. N. (2017). Longitudinal relations between adolescents’ self-esteem and prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends and family. Journal of Adolescence, 57, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.04.002.CrossRefPubMed

Giletta, M., Choukas-Bradley, S., Maes, M., Linthicum, K. P., Card, N. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2021). A meta-analysis of longitudinal peer influence effects in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 147, 719–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000329.CrossRefPubMed

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.

Hofmann, V., & Müller, C. M. (2018). Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates’ prosocial behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 68, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013.CrossRefPubMed

Hoglund, W. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2004). The effects of family, school, and classroom ecologies on changes in children’s social competence and emotional and behavioral problems in first grade. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.533.CrossRefPubMed

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

King, R. B. (2016). Gender differences in motivation, engagement and achievement are related to students’ perceptions of peer—But not of parent or teacher—Attitudes toward school. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.006.CrossRef

Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ladd, G. W., Herald-Brown, S. L., & Reiser, M. (2008). Does chronic classroom peer rejection predict the development of children’s classroom participation during the grade school years? Child Development, 79(4), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01172.x.CrossRefPubMed

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.CrossRef

Lam, C., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2014). Time with peers from middle childhood to late adolescence: Developmental course and adjustment correlates. Child Development, 85(4), 1677–1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lam, S., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Liu, Y., Negovan, V., Shin, H., Stanculescu, E., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004.CrossRefPubMed

Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2018). Aggressive and prosocial peer norms: Change, stability, and associations with adolescent aggressive and prosocial behavior development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(2), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616665211.CrossRef

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033.CrossRef

Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365.CrossRef

Memmott-Elison, M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., & Coyne, S. M. (2020). Intra-individual associations between intentional self-regulation and prosocial behavior during adolescence: Evidence for bidirectionality. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

Mikami, A. Y., Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A., & Allen, J. P. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0724-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moses, J. O., & Villodas, M. T. (2017). The potential protective role of peer relationships on school engagement in at-risk adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2255–2272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0644-1.CrossRefPubMed

Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Muthen & Muthen.

Nelson, D. A., & Crick, N. R. (1999). Rose-colored glasses: Examining the social information-processing of prosocial young adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001002.CrossRef

O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Furlong, M. J. (2014). Influence of classroom and school climate on teacher perceptions of student problem behavior. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal, 6(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9118-8.CrossRef

Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (2014). The study of prosocial behavior: Past, present, and future. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach. (2014-09499-001; pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199964772.003.0001.

Padilla-Walker, L. M., Memmott-Elison, M. K., & Coyne, S. M. (2018). Associations between prosocial and problem behavior from early to late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0736-y.CrossRefPubMed

Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036006.CrossRef

Rastogi, R., & Juvonen, J. (2019). Interminority friendships and intergroup attitudes across middle school: Quantity and stability of Black-Latino ties. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(8), 1619–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01044-9.CrossRefPubMed

Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034934.CrossRef

Ryan, A., North, E. A., & Ferguson, S. (2019). Chapter 6—Peers and Engagement. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions (pp. 73–85). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00006-1.

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.

Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2018). You’ve got a friend(ly school): Can school prosocial norms and friends similarly protect victims from distress? Social Development, 27(3), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12281.CrossRef

Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603.CrossRef

Tashjian, S. M., Rahal, D., Karan, M., Eisenberger, N., Galván, A., Cole, S. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2021). Evidence from a randomized controlled trial that altruism moderates the effect of prosocial acts on adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01362-3.CrossRefPubMed

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907.CrossRef

Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., & Swanson, J. (2010). Prediction of kindergartners’ academic achievement from their effortful control and emotionality: Evidence for direct and moderated relations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018992.CrossRef

Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1.CrossRefPubMed

van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. (2016). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.2016.26.issue-1, https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12173.

Van Ryzin, M. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2018). Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wang, M.-T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, M.-T., L. Degol, J., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912.CrossRef

Wang, Z., Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. A. (2014). Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000050.CrossRefPubMed

Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social and academic motivation in middle school: Concurrent and long-term relations to academic effort. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431696016004002.CrossRef

Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195.CrossRef

Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68(6), 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132301.CrossRefPubMed

Wentzel, K. R., Filisetti, L., & Looney, L. (2007). Adolescent prosocial behavior: The role of self-processes and contextual cues. Child Development, 78(3), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01039.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2017). Peer and teacher supports in relation to motivation and effort: A multi-level study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.11.002.CrossRef

Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2018). Emotional support, social goals, and classroom behavior: A multilevel, multisite study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000239.CrossRef

Titel: Student’s and Classmates’ Prosocial Behavior predict Academic Engagement in Middle School
Auteurs: Nicole R. Brass
ChenYu Hung
Tayla Stephen
Christi Bergin
Chad Rose
Sara Prewett
Publicatiedatum: 12-06-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 12/2024
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02027-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2024

Environmental Support Moderates the association of Socioeconomic Distress and Delay Discounting across Adolescence

Empirical Research

National Identity Development Among Minority Youth: Longitudinal Relations with National Fit Perceptions and School Belonging

Open Access
Empirical Research

Potential Mechanism Linking Peer Relationships and Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: Mediation of Cognitive Empathy and Moderations of OXTR and DRD2

Empirical Research

Testing the Associations Between Attachment Anxiety, Relational Aggression and Depressive Symptoms in Romantic Relationships: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediator Model

Empirical Research

Longitudinal Associations Among Socioeconomic Status, Delay Discounting, and Substance Use in Adolescence

Open Access
Empirical Research

They Are Not All the Same: Defenders of Ethnically Victimized Adolescents

Open Access
Empirical Research

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Student’s and Classmates’ Prosocial Behavior predict Academic Engagement in Middle School

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2024

Environmental Support Moderates the association of Socioeconomic Distress and Delay Discounting across Adolescence

National Identity Development Among Minority Youth: Longitudinal Relations with National Fit Perceptions and School Belonging

Potential Mechanism Linking Peer Relationships and Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: Mediation of Cognitive Empathy and Moderations of OXTR and DRD2

Testing the Associations Between Attachment Anxiety, Relational Aggression and Depressive Symptoms in Romantic Relationships: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediator Model

Longitudinal Associations Among Socioeconomic Status, Delay Discounting, and Substance Use in Adolescence

They Are Not All the Same: Defenders of Ethnically Victimized Adolescents

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Environmental Support Moderates the association of Socioeconomic Distress and Delay Discounting across Adolescence

National Identity Development Among Minority Youth: Longitudinal Relations with National Fit Perceptions and School Belonging

Potential Mechanism Linking Peer Relationships and Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: Mediation of Cognitive Empathy and Moderations of OXTR and DRD2

Testing the Associations Between Attachment Anxiety, Relational Aggression and Depressive Symptoms in Romantic Relationships: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediator Model

Longitudinal Associations Among Socioeconomic Status, Delay Discounting, and Substance Use in Adolescence

They Are Not All the Same: Defenders of Ethnically Victimized Adolescents