Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2012 | Original Article

The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases

Auteurs: Oliver Herbort, Martin V. Butz

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

The grasp orientation when grasping an object is frequently aligned in anticipation of the intended rotation of the object (end-state comfort effect). We analyzed grasp orientation selection in a continuous task to determine the mechanisms underlying the end-state comfort effect. Participants had to grasp a box by a circular handle—which allowed for arbitrary grasp orientations—and then had to rotate the box by various angles. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed both that the rotation’s direction considerably determined grasp orientations and that end-postures varied considerably. Experiments 3 and 4 further showed that visual stimuli and initial arm postures biased grasp orientations if the intended rotation could be easily achieved. The data show that end-state comfort but also other factors determine grasp orientation selection. A simple mechanism that integrates multiple weighted biases can account for the data.
vorige artikel Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs
volgende artikel An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
With the term “anticipatory grasp orientations”, we refer to grasp orientations that have an anticipatory component.
 
2
The rotation angle can assume both positive and negative values
 
3
The effect of the context is unlikely to be cancelled out by the different ratios of women and men participating in Experiments 1 and 2 (c.f. Fischman 1998), because similar results are obtained if only women are included in the analysis (for all interactions p > 0.23).
 
4
Grasp selection may be biased by optical illusions (Crajé et al. 2008). However, here we did not want to create an illusion that distorted the perceived orientation of the object that was to be grasped, but wanted to suggest a certain way of grasping and turning the box to the participants.
 
5
Note that we only included the arrow start position left and right because they are the conditions that can be interpreted most easily.
 
6
We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this explanation.
 
7
We used the matlab function fminsearchbnd (http://​www.​mathworks.​com/​matlabcentral/​fileexchange/​8277-fminsearchbnd) to determine values that result in the smallest root mean square error for each participant. We constrained the values of p anti,cw, p anti,ccw, and p const to [−200°,200°]. As each participant provided only three data points in Experiment 2, the model, which has four free parameters in the case of Experiment 2, fits the data trivially (R 2 = 1.0).
 
Literatuur
Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36–41.PubMedCrossRef
Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–15.
Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture. Psychological Review, 114(4), 1015–1046.PubMedCrossRef
Chapman, K. M., Weiss, D. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(2), 229–232.PubMedCrossRef
Cisek, P. (2006). Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(38), 9761–9770.PubMedCrossRef
Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486–495.CrossRef
Coren, S. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 1–3.
Crajé, C., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2008). The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 53–62.CrossRef
Engelbrecht, S. E. (2001). Minimum principles in motor control. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 497–542.PubMedCrossRef
Erlhagen, W., & Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review, 109(3), 545–572.PubMedCrossRef
Fischer, M. H., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Vaughan, J. (1997). Speed and sequential effects in reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 404–428.PubMedCrossRef
Fischman, M. G. (1998). Constraints on grip-selection: Minimizing awkwardness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 328–330.PubMed
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688–1703.PubMed
Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99(2), 201–215.CrossRef
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394, 780–784.PubMedCrossRef
Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2007). Encoding complete body models enables task dependent optimal control. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 20, 1639–1644.
Herbort, O., & Butz, M. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202(4), 867–878.CrossRef
Hughes, C. (1996). Brief report: Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(1), 99–107.PubMedCrossRef
Johnson, S. H. (2000). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition, 74(1), 33–70.PubMedCrossRef
Kelso, J. A. S., Buchanan, J. J., & Murata, T. (1994). Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping. Human Movement Science, 13(1), 63–94.CrossRef
Marotta, J. J., Medendorp, W. P., & Crawford, J. D. (2003). Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3816–3820.PubMedCrossRef
Matsuoka, J., Berger, R. A., Berglund, L. J., & An, K.-N. (2006). An analysis of symmetry of torque strength of the forearm under resisted forearm rotation in normal subjects. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 31(5), 801–805.PubMedCrossRef
O’Sullivan, L., & Gallwey, T. (2005). Forearm torque strengths and discomfort profiles in pronation and supination. Ergonomics, 48(6), 703–721.PubMedCrossRef
Pezzulo, G., Butz, M. V., Gastelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2008). The challenge of anticipation: A unifying framework for the analysis and design of artificial cognitive systems. Berlin: Springer.
Robert, T., Beurier, G., & Wang, X. (2009). Arm postural anticipation for rotating a spherical object. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 12(1), 217–218.CrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., Weiss, D. J., & van der Wel, R. (2007). The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley’s legacy. Human Movement Science, 26, 525–554.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006). Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 918–922.CrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, 11(1–2), 61–69.CrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102(1), 28–67.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Siotta, J. D., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance, Vol. XIII (pp. 321–345). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108(4), 709–734.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C. M., & Caldwell, G. E. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94, 59–85.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1058–1073.PubMedCrossRef
Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Jorgensen, M. J., Barnes, H. J., & Stewart, E. (1993). Plans for object manipulation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance XIV—a silver jubilee: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 803–820). Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, & Schack, T. (in press). Motor control strategies in a continuous task space. Motor Control.
Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1999). Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychologica, 100(3), 243–252.PubMedCrossRef
Soechting, J. F., Buneo, C. A., Herrmann, U., & Flanders, M. (1995). Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: Does donders’ law apply to arm movement? Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6271–6280.PubMed
Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy: Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 385–397.CrossRef
Thibaut, J.-P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 116–129.PubMedCrossRef
Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7(9), 907–915.CrossRef
van Swieten, L. M., van Bergen, E., Williams, J. H., Wilson, A. D., Plumb, M. S., Kent, S. W., et al. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 493–499.PubMedCrossRef
Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Huelshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132(1), 68–79.PubMedCrossRef
Weiss, D. J., Wark, J. D., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science, 18(12), 1063–1068.PubMedCrossRef
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.PubMedCrossRef
Zhang, W., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Planning for manual positioning: The end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 383–389.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases
Auteurs
Oliver Herbort
Martin V. Butz
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0334-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

The motor side of emotions: investigating the relationship between hemispheres, motor reactions and emotional stimuli

  • Original Article

Evaluative conditioning may occur with and without contingency awareness

  • Original Article

An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand

  • Original Article

Sequence effects by non-predictive arrow cues

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs

  • Original Article

The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S–R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?

  • Original Article