Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2012 | Original Article

An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand

Auteurs: Germán Gálvez-García, Alyanne M. De Haan, Juan Lupiañez, H. Chris Dijkerman

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fingers are represented separately from the palm. An exogenous spatial orientation paradigm was used where participants had to detect a tactile stimulus that could appear on the palm, the middle finger or the ring finger of the left hand. The tactile target was preceded by a non-predictive cue using different stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA). We observed a Facilitation Effect in the palm and Inhibition of Return (IOR) for fingers using a short cue-target SOA, whereas the IOR was found in fingers and palm in long cue-target SOA. Also we observed a ‘Cue above Target’ effect (facilitation effect when the Cue had appeared distal to the target location in a vertical line) at the long SOA. Together, we suggest that the general pattern of results supports the proposed hypothesis about the different mental representation of fingers and palms, but with a considerable and hierarchical interrelation between them.
Literatuur
go back to reference Anema, H. A., Kessels, R. P., de Haan, E. H., Kappelle, L. J., Leijten, F. S., van Zandvoort, M. J., et al. (2008). Differences in finger localisation performance of patients with finger agnosia. Neuroreport, 19, 1429–1433.PubMedCrossRef Anema, H. A., Kessels, R. P., de Haan, E. H., Kappelle, L. J., Leijten, F. S., van Zandvoort, M. J., et al. (2008). Differences in finger localisation performance of patients with finger agnosia. Neuroreport, 19, 1429–1433.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Benedetti, F. (1985). Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 517–525.PubMedCrossRef Benedetti, F. (1985). Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 517–525.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Benton, A. L. (1959). Right-left discrimination and finger localization: Development and pathology. New York: Hoeber-Harper. Benton, A. L. (1959). Right-left discrimination and finger localization: Development and pathology. New York: Hoeber-Harper.
go back to reference Carlsen, A. N., Dakin, C. J., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2007). Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 199–205.CrossRef Carlsen, A. N., Dakin, C. J., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2007). Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 199–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambers, C. D., Payne, J. M., & Mattingley, J. B. (2007). Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1715–1724.PubMedCrossRef Chambers, C. D., Payne, J. M., & Mattingley, J. B. (2007). Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1715–1724.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, J. C., Bolanowski, S. J., & Verrillo, R. T. (2005). A direct comparison of exogenous and endogenous inhibition of return and selective attention mechanisms in the somatosensory system. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 22, 269–279.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, J. C., Bolanowski, S. J., & Verrillo, R. T. (2005). A direct comparison of exogenous and endogenous inhibition of return and selective attention mechanisms in the somatosensory system. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 22, 269–279.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Driver, J., & Spence, C. J. (1994). Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconcious information processing (pp. 311–331). Cambridge: MIT Press. Driver, J., & Spence, C. J. (1994). Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconcious information processing (pp. 311–331). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Gelnar P. A, Krauss, B. R, Szeverenyi N. M, & Apkarian, A. V. (1998). Fingertip representation in the human somatosensory cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 7, 261. Gelnar P. A, Krauss, B. R, Szeverenyi N. M, & Apkarian, A. V. (1998). Fingertip representation in the human somatosensory cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 7, 261.
go back to reference Gerstmann, J. (1942). Problem of imperception of disease and of impaired body territories with organic lesions: Relation to body scheme and its disorders. Archive of Neurology and Psychiatry, 48, 890–913. Gerstmann, J. (1942). Problem of imperception of disease and of impaired body territories with organic lesions: Relation to body scheme and its disorders. Archive of Neurology and Psychiatry, 48, 890–913.
go back to reference Haggard, P., Kitadono, K., Press, C., & Taylor-Clarke, M. (2006). The brain’s fingers and hands. Experimental Brain Research, 172, 94–102.CrossRef Haggard, P., Kitadono, K., Press, C., & Taylor-Clarke, M. (2006). The brain’s fingers and hands. Experimental Brain Research, 172, 94–102.CrossRef
go back to reference Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. (2005). Disorders of body scheme. In H. J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallett, & R. Leiguarda (Eds.), Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology (pp. 261–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. (2005). Disorders of body scheme. In H. J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallett, & R. Leiguarda (Eds.), Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology (pp. 261–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hamada, Y., Nozawa, T., Kado, H., & Suzuki, R. (2000). Different laterality between the thumb and index finger in human SII activities. NeuroReport, 11, 3603–3606.PubMedCrossRef Hamada, Y., Nozawa, T., Kado, H., & Suzuki, R. (2000). Different laterality between the thumb and index finger in human SII activities. NeuroReport, 11, 3603–3606.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Hämäläinen, H., Kekoni, J., Sams, M., & Tiihonen, J. (1990). Separate finger representations at the human second somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience, 37, 245–249. Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Hämäläinen, H., Kekoni, J., Sams, M., & Tiihonen, J. (1990). Separate finger representations at the human second somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience, 37, 245–249.
go back to reference Jarvelainen, J., & Schurmann, M. (2002). The motor cortex approximately 20 Hz rhythm reacts differently to thumb and middle finger stimulation: An MEG study. Neuroreport, 13, 1243–1246.PubMedCrossRef Jarvelainen, J., & Schurmann, M. (2002). The motor cortex approximately 20 Hz rhythm reacts differently to thumb and middle finger stimulation: An MEG study. Neuroreport, 13, 1243–1246.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 7, 77–91.CrossRef Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 7, 77–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayer, E., Martory, M. D., Pegna, A. J., Landis, T., Delavelle, J., & Annoni, J. M. (1999). A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. Brain, 122, 1107–1120.PubMedCrossRef Mayer, E., Martory, M. D., Pegna, A. J., Landis, T., Delavelle, J., & Annoni, J. M. (1999). A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. Brain, 122, 1107–1120.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Miles, E., Poliakoff, E., & Brown, R. J. (2008). Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task. Acta Psychologica, 128, 210–215.PubMedCrossRef Miles, E., Poliakoff, E., & Brown, R. J. (2008). Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task. Acta Psychologica, 128, 210–215.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Olatsdottir, H., Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Latash, M. L. (2004). Is the thumb a fifth finger? A study of digit interaction during force production tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 203–213.CrossRef Olatsdottir, H., Zatsiorsky, V. M., & Latash, M. L. (2004). Is the thumb a fifth finger? A study of digit interaction during force production tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 203–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Overvliet, K. E., Anema, H. A., Brenner, E., Dijkerman, H. C., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2011). Relative finger position influences whether you can localize tactile stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 245–255.CrossRef Overvliet, K. E., Anema, H. A., Brenner, E., Dijkerman, H. C., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2011). Relative finger position influences whether you can localize tactile stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 245–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Poliakoff, E., Spence, C., O’Boyle, D. J., McGlone, F. P., & Cody, F. W. (2002). Tactile inhibition of return: Non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 54–59.CrossRef Poliakoff, E., Spence, C., O’Boyle, D. J., McGlone, F. P., & Cody, F. W. (2002). Tactile inhibition of return: Non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 54–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408.CrossRef Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). New York: Hillsdale. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). New York: Hillsdale.
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Wilkinson, R. T. (1969). On the process of preparation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomics Society, 1971. Posner, M. I., & Wilkinson, R. T. (1969). On the process of preparation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomics Society, 1971.
go back to reference Röder, B., Spence, C., & Rösler, F. (2002). Assessing the effect of posture changes on tactile inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 453–462.CrossRef Röder, B., Spence, C., & Rösler, F. (2002). Assessing the effect of posture changes on tactile inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 453–462.CrossRef
go back to reference Santangelo, V., & Spence, C. (2007). Assessing the automaticity of the exogenous orienting of tactile attention. Perception, 36, 1497–1505.PubMedCrossRef Santangelo, V., & Spence, C. (2007). Assessing the automaticity of the exogenous orienting of tactile attention. Perception, 36, 1497–1505.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schweizer, R., Maier, M., Braun, C., & Birbaumer, N. (2000). Distribution of mislocalizations of tactile stimuli on the fingers of the human hand. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 17, 309–316.PubMedCrossRef Schweizer, R., Maier, M., Braun, C., & Birbaumer, N. (2000). Distribution of mislocalizations of tactile stimuli on the fingers of the human hand. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 17, 309–316.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schweizer, R., Voit, D., & Frahm, J. (2008). Finger representations in human primary somatosensory cortex as revealed by high-resolution functional MRI of tactile stimulation. NeuroImage, 42, 28–35.PubMedCrossRef Schweizer, R., Voit, D., & Frahm, J. (2008). Finger representations in human primary somatosensory cortex as revealed by high-resolution functional MRI of tactile stimulation. NeuroImage, 42, 28–35.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1998). Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 125–139.PubMedCrossRef Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1998). Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 125–139.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E., & Driver, J. (2000a). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 42–48.CrossRef Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E., & Driver, J. (2000a). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 42–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Spence, C., & McGlone, F. P. (2001). Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 324–330.CrossRef Spence, C., & McGlone, F. P. (2001). Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 324–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Spence, C., Nicholls, M., Gillespie, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 544–557.CrossRef Spence, C., Nicholls, M., Gillespie, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 544–557.CrossRef
go back to reference Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000b). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1298–1319.PubMedCrossRef Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000b). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1298–1319.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tanosaki, M., Iguchi, Y., Hoshi, Y., & Hashimoto, I. (2003). Tactile interference to the face affects magnetic responses elicited by electric thumb stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2118–2123.PubMedCrossRef Tanosaki, M., Iguchi, Y., Hoshi, Y., & Hashimoto, I. (2003). Tactile interference to the face affects magnetic responses elicited by electric thumb stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2118–2123.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tanosaki, M., Iguchi, Y., Kimura, T., Takino, R., & Hashimoto, I. (2004). Functional connectivity between forearm and digits representations in human somatosensory area 3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2638–2644.PubMedCrossRef Tanosaki, M., Iguchi, Y., Kimura, T., Takino, R., & Hashimoto, I. (2004). Functional connectivity between forearm and digits representations in human somatosensory area 3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2638–2644.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection. Vision Research, 34, 179–189.PubMedCrossRef Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection. Vision Research, 34, 179–189.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van-Riperm, C. (1935). An experimental study of the Japanese illusion. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 252–263.CrossRef Van-Riperm, C. (1935). An experimental study of the Japanese illusion. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 252–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Weger, U. W., Al-Aidroos, N., & Pratt, J. (2008). Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian. Psychological Research, 72, 176–182.PubMedCrossRef Weger, U. W., Al-Aidroos, N., & Pratt, J. (2008). Objects do not aid inhibition of return in crossing the vertical meridian. Psychological Research, 72, 176–182.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zampini, M., Harris, C., & Spence, C. (2005). Effect of posture change on tactile perception: Impaired direction discrimination performance with interleaved fingers. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 498–508.CrossRef Zampini, M., Harris, C., & Spence, C. (2005). Effect of posture change on tactile perception: Impaired direction discrimination performance with interleaved fingers. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 498–508.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand
Auteurs
Germán Gálvez-García
Alyanne M. De Haan
Juan Lupiañez
H. Chris Dijkerman
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0349-0