Top

Gepubliceerd in:

22-07-2024 | Research

The interconnection of orthographic, phonetic, and semantic skills with arithmetic fluency

Auteurs: Jing Lyu, Jiaxin Cui, Fan Yang, Xing Gao, Zhanling Cui, Xinlin Zhou

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 8/2024

Abstract

Arithmetic fluency is considered considers highly rely on language processing, encompassing essential skills. However, the independent predictive power of phonetic, semantic, or orthographic skills in relation to arithmetic fluency remains an unresolved query. This study introduces the common component hypothesis to elucidate the inconsistent findings in previous research. The hypothesis posits that significant correlations between language and mathematics hinge on whether the language and mathematics utilized in a given task share a common component. According to this hypothesis, processing skills for each of the three fundamental language elements (i.e., phonetic, semantic, orthographic) should correlate with arithmetic fluency, as these elements are also integral to simple arithmetic processing. A cohort of one hundred and ninety-eight primary school students participated in the study, undertaking a battery of tests assessing general cognitive abilities, psycholinguistic elements, and arithmetic fluency. The results showed that orthographic, phonetic, and semantic abilities independently predicted arithmetic fluency, even after accounting for all other cognitive predictors. These findings substantiate the common component hypothesis, providing empirical support for explaining the association between language and mathematics. This evidence contributes to addressing the interplay between language and mathematics in educational contexts.

vorige artikel Strategy variability in computational estimation and its association with mathematical achievement

volgende artikel Altered temporal awareness during Covid-19 pandemic

Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2019). A distinct cortical network for mathematical knowledge in the human brain. Neuroimage, 189, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.001CrossRefPubMed

Amland, T., Lervag, A., & Melby-Lervag, M. (2020). Comorbidity between Math and reading problems: Is phonological Processing a mutual factor? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 577304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.577304CrossRefPubMed

Andin, J., Rönnberg, J., & Rudner, M. (2014). Deaf signers use phonology to do arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.015CrossRef

Andin, J., Fransson, P., Dahlström, Ö., Rönnberg, J., & Rudner, M. (2019). The neural basis of arithmetic and phonology in deaf signing individuals. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 813–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1616103CrossRef

Ardila, A., Galeano, L. M., & Rosselli, M. (1998). Toward a model of neuropsychological activity. Neuropsychology Review, 8(4), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021618218943CrossRefPubMed

Bjork, I. M., & Bowyer-Crane, C. (2013). Cognitive skills used to solve mathematical word problems and numerical operations: A study of 6-to 7-year-old children. Europaean Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1345–1360CrossRef

Bjorn, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2016). Primary school text comprehension predics mathematical word problem skills in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 36, 362–377.CrossRef

Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (2009). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in kindergarten, first and third grades: An opportunity-propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.01.002

Cappelletti, M., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2001). Spared numerical abilities in a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 39(11), 1224–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00035-5CrossRefPubMed

Cappelletti, M., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2012). Numeracy skills in patients with degenerative disorders and focal brain lesions: A neuropsychological investigation. Neuropsychology, 26(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026328CrossRefPubMed

Cirino, P. T. (2011). The interrelationships of mathematical precursors in kindergarten. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(4), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.004CrossRefPubMed

Cirino, P. T., Morris, M. K., & Morris, R. D. (2002). Neuropsychological concomitants of calculation skills in college students referred for learning difficulties. Dev Neuropsychol, 21(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2102_6CrossRefPubMed

Cirino, P. T., Morris, M. K., & Morris, R. D. (2007). Semantic, executive, and visuospatial abilities in mathematical reasoning of referred college students. Assessment, 14(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106291487CrossRefPubMed

Conrad, N. J., Harris, N., & Williams, J. (2013). Individual differences in children’s literacy development: The contribution of orthographic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 26, 1223–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9415-2CrossRef

Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001

Cui, J., Zhang, Y., Wan, S., Chen, C., Zeng, J., & Zhou, X. (2019). Visual form perception is fundamental for both reading comprehension and arithmetic computation. Cognition, 189, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.014CrossRefPubMed

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Lambert, W., Stuebing, K., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Problem solving and computational skill: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition?. Journal of educational psychology, 100(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.30

Greiner de, C., Mervis, C. B., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (2020). Cognitive predictors of arithmetic, reading, and spelling in Brazilian portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 34(1), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10062-0CrossRef

De Smedt, B., & Boets, B. (2010). Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: Evidence from developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 3973–3981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.018CrossRefPubMed

Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-nCrossRefPubMed

Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008CrossRefPubMed

Ekstrom, R. B. R., French, J. J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton Nj, Educational Testing Service.

Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Georgiou, G. K., Inoue, T., & Parrila, R. (2021). Do reading and arithmetic fluency share the same cognitive base? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 709448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709448CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gilmore, C., & Cragg, L. (2018). The role of executive function skills in the development of children’s mathematical competencies. In A. Henik & W. Fias (Eds.), Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition (pp. 263–286). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00014-5

Guilford, J. P. (1936). The determination of item difficulty when chance success is a factor. Psychometrika, 1(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287877CrossRef

Hedden, T., & Yoon, C. (2006). Individual differences in executive processing predict susceptibility to interference in verbal working memory. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.511.suppCrossRefPubMed

Heikkila, R., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Narhi, V., & Ahonen, T. (2016). Double-deficit hypothesis in a clinical sample: Extension Beyond Reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415572895CrossRefPubMed

Hermelin, B., & O’Connor, N. (1990). Factors and primes: A specific numerical ability. Psychological Medicine, 20(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700013349CrossRefPubMed

Huo, S., Zhang, X., & Law, Y. K. (2021). Pathways to word reading and calculation skills in young Chinese children: From biologically primary skills to biologically secondary skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000647CrossRef

Kleemans, T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). Cognitive and linguistic predictors of basic arithmetic skills: Evidence from first-language and second-language learners. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 61(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2014.934017CrossRef

Kleemans, T., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Role of linguistic skills in fifth-grade mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.012CrossRefPubMed

Koponen, T., Salmi, P., Eklund, K., & Aro, T. (2013). Counting and ran: Predictors of arithmetic calculation and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029285CrossRef

Koponen, T., Eklund, K., Heikkila, R., Salminen, J., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., & Aro, M. (2020). Cognitive correlates of the Covariance in reading and arithmetic fluency: Importance of serial Retrieval Fluency. Child Development, 91(4), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13287CrossRefPubMed

Landerl, K., Fussenegger, B., Moll, K., & Willburger, E. (2009). Dyslexia and dyscalculia: Two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles. J Exp Chi Psychol, 103, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006CrossRef

Lehtonen, M., Fyndanis, V., & Jylkkä, J. (2023). The relationship between bilingual language use and executive functions. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00178-9

Li, M., Tan, Y., Cui, J., Chen, C., Dong, Q., & Zhou, X. (2019). The semantic network supports approximate computation. Neuropsychology, 33(6), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000548CrossRefPubMed

Li, T., Cui, J., Yuan, L., Yu, X., & Zhou, X. (2021). Common neural circuit for semantic-based articulation of numbers and words: A case study of a patient with Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 58, 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100969CrossRef

Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L.,& Halberda, J.(2013). Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.003

Luzzi, S., Cafazzo, V., Silvestrini, M., & Provinciali, L. (2013). Arithmetic knowledge in early semantic dementia. Neurological Sciences : Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 34(9), 1613–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1294-zCrossRefPubMed

Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/749772

Moll, K., Snowling, M. J., Göbel, S. M., & Hulme, C. (2015). Early language and executive skills predict variations in number and arithmetic skills in children at family-risk of dyslexia and typically developing controls. Learning and Instruction, 38, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.03.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Monti, M. M., Parsons, Lawrence, M., & Osherson, D. N. (2012). Thought beyond language: Neural dissociation of algebra and natural language. Psychological Science, 23(8), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612437427CrossRefPubMed

Nunes, T. (2009). Development of maths capabilities and confidence in primary school. DCSF Research Report RR118.https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/11154

Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200006)11:2;1-Q;FT165

Palmer, P. B., & O’Connell, D. G. (2009). Regression analysis for prediction: Understanding the process. Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal, 20(3), 23–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Putz, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., Sporter, R. J., & McBurney, D. H. (2004). Sex hormones and finger length. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(3), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.005CrossRef

Raven, J. (2000). The raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0735CrossRefPubMed

Singer, V., & Strasser, K. (2017). The association between arithmetic and reading performance in school: A meta-analytic study. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000197CrossRefPubMed

Singer, V., Strasser, K., & Cuadro, A. (2019). Direct and indirect paths from linguistic skills to arithmetic school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000290CrossRef

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.CrossRef

Träff, U., Desoete, A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2017). Symbolic and non-symbolic number processing in children with developmental dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 56, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.010CrossRef

Varley, R. A., Klessinger, Nicolai, J. C., Romanowski, Charles, A. J., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(9), 3519–3524. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407470102

Wagner, R. K. (1986). Phonological processing abilities and reading: Implications for disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601901009CrossRefPubMed

Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192CrossRef

Wang, L., Sun, Y., & Zhou, X. (2016). Relation between approximate number system acuity and mathematical achievement: the influence of fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1966. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01966

Wei, W., Lu, H., Zhao, H., Chen, C., Dong, Q., & Zhou, X. (2012a). Gender differences in children’s arithmetic performance are accounted for by gender differences in language abilities. Psychological Science, 23(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427168CrossRefPubMed

Wei, W., Yuan, H., Chen, C., & Zhou, X. (2012b). Cognitive correlates of performance in advanced mathematics. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(Pt 1), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02049.xCrossRef

Wei, W., Chen, C., Yang, T., Zhang, H., & Zhou, X. (2014). Dissociated neural correlates of quantity processing of quantifiers, numbers, and numerosities. Human Brain Mapping, 35(2), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22190CrossRefPubMed

Yang, X., Yan, M., Ruan, Y., Ku, S. Y. Y., Lo, J. C. M., Peng, P., & McBride, C. (2021a). Relations among phonological processing skills and mathematics in children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000710CrossRef

Zamarian, L., Karner, E., Benke, T., Donnemiller, E., & Delazer, M. (2006). Knowing 7 x 8, but not the meaning of ‘elephant’: evidence for the dissociation between numerical and non-numerical semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1708–1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.032CrossRefPubMed

Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2018). Cognitive precursors of word reading versus arithmetic competencies in young Chinese children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.08.006CrossRef

Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Liu, H., Cui, J., & Zhou, X. (2016). Both non-symbolic and symbolic quantity processing are important for arithmetical computation but not for mathematical reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(7), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1205074

Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Chen, C., & Zhou, X. (2019). Visual form perception supports approximate number system acuity and arithmetic fluency. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.008CrossRef

Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., & Zhou, X. (2022). The association between non-symbolic number comparison and mathematical abilities depends on fluency. Cognitive Processing, 23(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01098-xCrossRefPubMed

Zhou, X., Wei, W., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., & Chen, C. (2015). Visual perception can account for the close relation between numerosity processing and computational fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01364

Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Yuan, L., Gu, T., & Li, D. (2020). Visual form perception predicts 3-year longitudinal development of mathematical achievement. Cognitive Processing, 21(4), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00980-wCrossRefPubMed

Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Marinelli, C. V., & Spinelli, D. (2020). Testing the specificity of predictors of reading, spelling and maths: A new model of the association among learning skills based on competence, performance and acquisition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 573998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.573998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: The interconnection of orthographic, phonetic, and semantic skills with arithmetic fluency
Auteurs: Jing Lyu
Jiaxin Cui
Fan Yang
Xing Gao
Zhanling Cui
Xinlin Zhou
Publicatiedatum: 22-07-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 8/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02005-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Thinking about numbers in different tongues: An overview of the influences of multilingualism on numerical and mathematical competencies

Review

What makes different number-space mappings interact?

Research

Altered temporal awareness during Covid-19 pandemic

Research

Correction: How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

Open Access
Correction

How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

Open Access
Research

What pupil size can and cannot tell about math anxiety

Open Access
Research

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

The interconnection of orthographic, phonetic, and semantic skills with arithmetic fluency

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2024

Thinking about numbers in different tongues: An overview of the influences of multilingualism on numerical and mathematical competencies

What makes different number-space mappings interact?

Altered temporal awareness during Covid-19 pandemic

Correction: How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

What pupil size can and cannot tell about math anxiety

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Thinking about numbers in different tongues: An overview of the influences of multilingualism on numerical and mathematical competencies

What makes different number-space mappings interact?

Altered temporal awareness during Covid-19 pandemic

Correction: How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice?

What pupil size can and cannot tell about math anxiety