Skip to main content

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2004 | Original Article

Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli

Auteurs: Wilfried Kunde, Peter Wühr

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2004

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Participants are worse at identifying spatial symbols (arrowheads) while performing spatially compatible manual key presses. The present experiments investigated the generality of this “blindness effect” to response-compatible stimuli. In Experiment 1 a left key press deteriorated the identification of left-pointing arrows, and a right key press deteriorated the perception of right-pointing arrows, independent of the hands used to press the key. Thus the blindness effect is based on codes of the distal response location rather than on the body-intrinsic anatomical connection of the hands. Experiment 2 extended the blindness effect to verbal responses and written position words (left, right, up, down). Vocalizing a position word blinded to directly compatible position words (e.g., left-left), but not to orthogonally compatible position words (e.g., left-down). This result suggests that the use of identical stimulus-response codes, and not the use of saliency-matching but distinct codes, suffices to produce blindness effects. Finally, Experiment 3 extended the blindness phenomenon beyond the spatial domain by demonstrating blindness between saying color words and perceiving color patches. Altogether, the experiments revealed action-induced blindness to be a phenomenon of broad empirical validity occurring whenever action and perception afford simultaneous access to the same conceptual codes.
Literatuur
go back to reference Altarriba, J. & Soltano, E. (1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents. Memory & Cognition, 24, 700–711. Altarriba, J. & Soltano, E. (1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents. Memory & Cognition, 24, 700–711.
go back to reference Cho, Y. S. & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73. Cho, Y. S. & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73.
go back to reference Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Affektive Blindheit gegenüber reaktionskompatiblen Stimuli. [Affective blindness for response-compatible stimuli]. In J. Golz, F. Faul, & R. Mausfeld (Eds). Experimentelle Psychologie. Abstracts der 45. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 77). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst. Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Affektive Blindheit gegenüber reaktionskompatiblen Stimuli. [Affective blindness for response-compatible stimuli]. In J. Golz, F. Faul, & R. Mausfeld (Eds). Experimentelle Psychologie. Abstracts der 45. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (p. 77). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues on stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues on stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2000). Welche Handlungen machen uns blind wofür? Wie Handlungsplanung unsere Wahrnehmung beeinflusst [Which actions blind us for what? How action planning affects perception]. In D. Vorberg, A. Fuchs, T. Futterer, A., Heinecke, U., Heinrichs, U. Mattler, & S. Töllner (Eds.). Experimentelle Psychologie. Abstracts der 42. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst (p. 28). Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2000). Welche Handlungen machen uns blind wofür? Wie Handlungsplanung unsere Wahrnehmung beeinflusst [Which actions blind us for what? How action planning affects perception]. In D. Vorberg, A. Fuchs, T. Futterer, A., Heinecke, U., Heinrichs, U. Mattler, & S. Töllner (Eds.). Experimentelle Psychologie. Abstracts der 42. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst (p. 28).
go back to reference Hommel., B., & Müsseler, J. (2003). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hommel., B., & Müsseler, J. (2003). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events. Manuscript submitted for publication.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 869–937. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 869–937.
go back to reference Kanwisher. N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.PubMed Kanwisher. N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.PubMed
go back to reference Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297–1303. Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297–1303.
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.PubMed Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.PubMed
go back to reference Morin, R.E., & Grant, D. (1955). Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 39–47.PubMed Morin, R.E., & Grant, D. (1955). Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 39–47.PubMed
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMed Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.PubMed
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129.
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Wühr, P. (2002). Response-evoked interference in visual encoding. In: W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 520–537). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Müsseler, J., & Wühr, P. (2002). Response-evoked interference in visual encoding. In: W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 520–537). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743–767.CrossRef Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743–767.CrossRef
go back to reference Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 137–154. Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 137–154.
go back to reference Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, U., & Ladavas. E. (1984). Compatibility due to coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica, 57, 133–143.PubMed Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, U., & Ladavas. E. (1984). Compatibility due to coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica, 57, 133–143.PubMed
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Wang, H. (1997). Differentiating types of set-level compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam. North-Holland. Proctor, R. W., & Wang, H. (1997). Differentiating types of set-level compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam. North-Holland.
go back to reference Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65–74.PubMed Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65–74.PubMed
go back to reference Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C. & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431–440.CrossRef Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C. & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431–440.CrossRef
go back to reference Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
go back to reference Vu, K. L., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial incompatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25–40.CrossRefPubMed Vu, K. L., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Vertical versus horizontal spatial incompatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25–40.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366. Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366.
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260.CrossRefPubMed Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli
Auteurs
Wilfried Kunde
Peter Wühr
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2004
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0156-3