Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2004 | Original Article

Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes

Auteur: Ingrid Scharlau

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2004

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Attending to a location shortens the perceptual latency of stimuli appearing at this location (perceptual latency priming). According to attentional explanations, perceptual latency priming relies on the speeded transfer of attended visual information into an internal model. However, doubts about the attentional origin have repeatedly been raised because efforts to minimize response bias have been insufficient in most studies. Five experiments investigated the contribution of a response bias to perceptual latency priming (judgment bias due to the two-alternative forced-choice method and due to the existence of the prime, criterion effects or second-order bias, sensorimotor priming). If any, only small response biases were found. The results thus support the attentional explanation.
vorige artikel The influence of string length and repetition on chunking of digit strings
volgende artikel Independent mechanisms for dividing attention between the motion and the color of dynamic random dot patterns
Literatuur
Aschersleben, G. (1999). Aufgabenabhängige Datierung von Ereignissen [Task-dependent timing of events]. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
Bachmann, T. (1999). Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena and one explanation. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology (pp. 173–206). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
Boring, E. G. (1920). The control of attitude in psychophysical experiments. Psychological Review, 27, 440–452.
Boring, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572–1595.
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. (1991). Central and peripheral precueing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 859–880.PubMed
Enns, J. T., & DiLollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135–139.
Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 251–261.
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201–204.
Fehrer, E., & Raab, E. (1962). Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 143–147.
Fernberger, S. W. (1930). The use of equality judgments in pscho-physical procedures. Psychological Review, 37, 107–112.
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Frey, R. D. (1990). Selective attention, event perception and the criterion of acceptability principle: Evidence supporting and rejecting the doctrine of prior entry. Human Movement Science, 9, 481–530.CrossRef
Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669–680.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219–1240.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993b). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation. Perception, 22, 517–526.
Jaskowski, P. (1991). Two-stage model for order discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 76–82.
Jaskowski, P. (1993). Selective attention and temporal-order judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 681–689.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346–354.
Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992.CrossRef
Lambert, A., Naikar, N., McLachlan, K., & Aitken, V. (1999). A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 321–340.CrossRef
Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Interferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263–269.CrossRef
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168–180.CrossRefPubMed
Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. (1999). Pertentional retouch, selective attention and synchronicity priming: Commentary on Bachmann. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology (pp. 173–206). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69, 129–155.CrossRefPubMed
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330.PubMed
Neumann, O. (1990). Visual attention and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 227–267). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neumann, O., & Müsseler, J. (1990). Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wetterwart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen [Visual focusing: The weather station model and some applications]. In C. Meinecke & L. Kehrer (Eds.), Bielefelder Beiträge zur Kognitionspsychologie [Bielefeld contributions to cognitive psychology] (pp. 77–108). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Neumann, O., Esselmann, U., & Klotz, W. (1993). Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal order judgment. Psychological Research, 56, 26–34.PubMed
Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.PubMed
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rorden, C., Mattingley, J. B., Karnath, H.-O., & Driver, J. (1997). Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia, 35, 421–433.CrossRefPubMed
Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346–1360.
Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift. Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351–1363.CrossRefPubMed
Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003). Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 185–203.CrossRefPubMed
Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (in press). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation. Psychological Research.
Scott, S. K. (1998). The point of P-centres. Psychological Research, 61, 4–11.
Shore, D. I., Spence, C., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Visual prior entry. Psychological Science, 12, 205–212.CrossRefPubMed
Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799–832.CrossRef
Steglich, C., & Neumann, O. (2000). Temporal, but not spatial, context modulates a masked prime's effect on temporal order judgment, but not on response latency. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 63, 36–47.PubMed
Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539–550.CrossRefPubMed
Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 625–685). New York: Academic Press.
Stone, S. A. (1926). Prior entry in the auditory-tactual complication. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 284–287.
Titchener, E. M. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: MacMillan.
Treisman, A. (1986) Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American, 255, 114–125.
Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224–239.
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (in press). Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. J. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 40–64.
Wolfe, J. (1992) The parallel guidance of visual attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 124–128.
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1961). Experimental psychology (revised edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes
Auteur
Ingrid Scharlau
Publicatiedatum
01-08-2004
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0135-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2004

Perceiving while acting: action affects perception

  • Original Article

Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli

  • Original Article

The word-frequency paradox for recall/recognition occurs for pictures

  • Original Article

Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli

  • Original Article

Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms

  • Original Article

Independent mechanisms for dividing attention between the motion and the color of dynamic random dot patterns

  • Original Article