Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat je Mijn BSL eenvoudig en snel kunt raadplegen. Je kunt je links eenvoudig registreren. Met deze gegevens kun je thuis, of waar ook ter wereld toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL. Heb je een vraag, neem dan contact op met helpdesk@thim.nl.

» Andere revante producten voor THIM studenten en medewerkers.

Registreer

Om ook buiten de locaties van THIM, thuis bijvoorbeeld, van Mijn BSL gebruik te kunnen maken, moet je jezelf eenmalig registreren. Dit kan alleen vanaf een computer op een van de locaties van THIM.

Eenmaal geregistreerd kun je thuis of waar ook ter wereld onbeperkt toegang krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Login

Als u al geregistreerd bent, hoeft u alleen maar in te loggen om onbeperkt toegang te krijgen tot Mijn BSL.

Inloggen
Top
Psychological Research
Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2012 | Original Article

The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study

Auteur: Sharlene D. Newman

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate the role of phonology in visual word recognition (VWR). A group of children between the ages of 7 and 13 participated in a lexical decision task in which lexical frequency and homophony were manipulated. A significant homophone effect was observed for the high-frequency condition, indicating that phonology does indeed play a significant role in VWR. The brain activation patterns also support this idea in that regions that have been linked to phonological processing, the inferior frontal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobe, also revealed a homophone effect. Additionally, the posterior superior temporal cortex showed a homophone effect; however, this activation is argued to be related to lexical competition generated by the high-frequency homophone via the activation of multiple semantic representations.
vorige artikel Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search
volgende artikel Learning and transfer of category knowledge in an indirect categorization task
Literatuur
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereberal Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.CrossRef
Bookheimer, S. Y., Zeffiro, T. A., Blaxton, T., Gaillard, W., & Theodore, W. (1995). Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Human Brain Mapping, 3, 93–106.CrossRef
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2004). Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1234–1249.PubMedCrossRef
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990.
Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489–507.CrossRef
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 64–85). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.PubMedCrossRef
Doctor, E. A., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory and Cognition, 8, 195–209.CrossRef
Eiter, B. M., & Inhoff, A. W. (2008). Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation. Psychological Research, 72, 666–674.PubMedCrossRef
Etard, O., Mellet, E., Papathanassiou, D., Benali, K., Houde, O., Mazoyer, B., et al. (2000). Picture naming without Broca’s and Wernicke’s area. Neuroreport, 11, 617–622.PubMedCrossRef
Friederici, A. D., Ruschemeyer, S. A., Hahne, A., & Fiebach, C. J. (2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereberal Cortex, 13, 170–177.CrossRef
Friston, K., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J., & Frackowiak, R. (1995). Spatial registration and normalization of images. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 165–189.CrossRef
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99.PubMedCrossRef
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402.PubMedCrossRef
Holyk, G. G., & Pexman, P. M. (2004). The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: are there individual differences? Brain and Language, 90, 353–367.PubMedCrossRef
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144.PubMedCrossRef
Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: an interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Local connectionists approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–187). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.CrossRef
Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereberal Cortex, 11, 223–237.CrossRef
Lüders, H., Lesser, R. P., Hahn, J., Dinner, D. S., Morris, H. H., Wyllie, E., et al. (1991). Basal temporal language area. Brain, 114, 743–754.PubMedCrossRef
Martin-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Gomez-Jarabo, G., & Rubia, F. J. (1999). The recognition potential: an ERP index of lexical access. Brainand and Language, 70, 364–384.CrossRef
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299.PubMedCrossRef
Meyler, A., Keller, T. A., cherkassky, V. L., Lee, D., Hoeft, F., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., et al. (2007). Brain activation during sentence comprehension among good and poor readers. Cereberal Cortex, 17, 2780–2787.CrossRef
Nixon, P., Lazarova, J., Hodinott-Hill, I., gough, P., & Passingham, R. (2004). The inferior frontal gyrus and phonological processing: an investigation using rTMS. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 289–300.PubMedCrossRef
Niznikiewicz, M., & Squires, N. K. (1996). Phonological processing and the role of strategy in silent reading: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Language, 52, 342–364.PubMedCrossRef
Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473–485.CrossRef
Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323–334.PubMedCrossRef
Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 139–156.CrossRef
Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 479–492.PubMedCrossRef
Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter? Cognition Psychology, 53, 97–145.CrossRef
Rumsey, J. M., Nace, K., Donohue, B., Wise, D., Maisog, J. M., & Andreason, P. (1997). A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. Archieves of Neurology, 49, 527–534.CrossRef
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage, 27, 188–200.PubMedCrossRef
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.PubMedCrossRef
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, Kr, Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101–110.PubMedCrossRef
Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 2860–2865.CrossRef
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767–773.PubMedCrossRef
Unsworth, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 63–81.
Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 44–57.PubMedCrossRef
Wise, R. J. S., Greene, J., Buchel, C., & Scott, S. K. (1999). Brain regions involved in articulation. Lancet, 353, 1057–1067.PubMedCrossRef
Yates, M. (2009). Phonological neighbourhood spread facilitates lexical decisions. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1304–1314.CrossRef
Yates, M., Locker, L. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 452–457.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study
Auteur
Sharlene D. Newman
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0347-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Sequence effects by non-predictive arrow cues

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

An attentional approach to study mental representations of different parts of the hand

  • Original Article

Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search

  • Original Article

Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues

  • Original Article

Evaluative conditioning may occur with and without contingency awareness

  • Original Article

Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs

  • Original Article