Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

21. Restauratie na endodontische behandeling

Auteur : Dr. H. P. B. Bolhuis

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Weefselbehoud en een adhesieve opbouw vormen de beste optie voor elementen met een wortelkanaalbehandeling. Getracht moet worden zo veel mogelijk supragingivaal tandweefsel te handhaven. Op die manier kunnen extra handelingen, kosten en risico’s bij de plaatsing van een wortelkanaalstift veelal achterwege blijven. Als een wortelkanaalstift onvermijdelijk is, moet men zich realiseren dat, ondanks het gebruik van adhesieve technieken, onverminderd van kracht blijft dat moet worden voorkomen dat de retentie van een opbouw louter afhankelijk is van de retentie van de wortelkanaalstift. Het behoud van supragingivaal tandweefsel en het zo veel mogelijk handhaven van ondersnijdingen in de pulpakamer vormen daarbij een belangrijke schakel. Restauraties van composiet, met en zonder overkapping, ofwel indirecte partiële overkappingrestauraties passen het best bij dit uitgangspunt.

vorige hoofdstuk Complicaties bij de wortelkanaalbehandeling

volgende hoofdstuk Epidemiologie in de endodontologie

In de Engelse taal wordt met de term ‘fer(r)ule’ het metalen buisje aangeduid dat bij gereedschap het splijten van een houten handvat moet voorkomen. Het Nederlands heeft geen woord met precies deze betekenis.

Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 2. influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008;41(1):6–31.

Pennington MW, Vernazza CR, Shackley P, Armstrong NT, Whitworth JM, Steele JG. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of root canal treatment using conventional approaches versus replacement with an implant. Int Endod J. 2009;42(10):874–83.PubMedCrossRef

De Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ, De Jager N, Kuijs R, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical performance of implant supported posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(1):59–66.PubMedCrossRef

Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:380–6.PubMedCrossRef

Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod. 1998;24:26–32.PubMedCrossRef

Bruers JJ. NMT Peilstations. Onderzoek tandheelkundige consumptie: resultaten over 2001. Nederlandse Maatschappij tot bevordering der Tandheelkunde (NMT), Onderzoek & Informatievoorziening. Nieuwegein NMT; 2002.

Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M, Price R, Wang XD, Zhao K. Direct and indirect restorations for endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 Consensus Conference Paper. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):183–94.PubMed

Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, De Souza RF, Chaves CA, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;16;(5):CD009109.

Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 25;(9):CD009109.

10.

Seddley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod. 1992;18:332–5.CrossRef

11.

Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Am J Dent. 2001;14:286–90.PubMed

12.

Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jul–Aug;14(4):355–63.

13.

Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1477–82.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater. 1993;9:2–5.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Zhang L, Magni E, Radovic I, Wang Y, Chen J, Ferrari M. Effect of curing modes of dual-curing luting systems and root regions on retention of translucent fiber posts in root canals. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(3):219–26.PubMed

16.

Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley YDH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001;17:542–56.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, El Zohairy AA, Feilzer AJ. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Dent Mater. 2006;3:223–33.CrossRef

18.

Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Burgersdijk RC. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:559–63.PubMed

19.

Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1540–4.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1995;21:57–61.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Mondelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, De Oliveira FO, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(3):161–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li1 JX, Chu CH. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Int Endod J. 2012;45:524–9.

23.

Panahandeh KN, Torabzadeh H, Ziaee N, Mahdian M, Tootiaee B, Ghasemi A. The effect of composite thickness on the stress distribution pattern of restored maxillary premolar with cusp reduction. J of Prosthodont. 2017;26(5):440–5.CrossRef

24.

Aurélio L, Fraga S, Rippe MP, Valandro LF. Are posts necessary for the restoration of root filled teeth with limited tissue loss? A structured review of laboratory and clinical studies. Int Endod J. 2016;49(9):827–35.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:297–301.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Sulaiman TA, Delgado AJ, Donovan TE. Survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations at 4 years: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(3):364–6.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):595–602.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. American J of Esth Dentistry vol. 2, Summer 2012.

29.

Lin C, Chang Y, Pai C. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Dent Mater. 2011;27(5):431–8.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, Da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8–14.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Lin CL, Chang YH, Hsieh SK, Chang WJ. Estimation of the failure risk of a maxillary premolar with different crack depths with endodontic treatment by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic restorations. J Endod. 2013;39(3):375–9.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1990;16(12):566–9.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H. Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e237–42.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Hayes A, Duvall N, Wajdowicz M, Roberts H. Effect of endocrown pulp chamber extension depth on molar fracture resistance. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):327–34.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, Ardu S, Krejci I, Rocca GT. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):942–8.

36.

Gresnigt M, Özcan M, Van den Houten ML, Schipper L, Cune MS. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater. 2016;32(5):607–14.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Fages M, Raynal J, Tramini P, Cuisinier FJ, Durand JC. Chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture all-ceramic crown and endocrown restorations: a 7-year survival rate study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(6):556–60.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent. 2017;63:1–7.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Clausson C, Schroeder CC, Goloni PV, Farias FAR, Passos L, Zanetti RV. Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate of endodontically treated mandibular damaged molars based on different preparation designs. Int J Biomater. 2019;12:2475297.

40.

Bolhuis HPB. Endodontisch behandelde gebitselementen: weefselbehoud en adhesieve opbouw beste optie. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2005;112:491–6.PubMed

41.

Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A. Lohbauer. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations Dent Mater. 2014;30(4):424–32.PubMed

42.

Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, Ngoenwiwatkul Y. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(3):157–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

43.

Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N. Creugers NH fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:313–7.PubMed

44.

Fennis WM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, Llassila LV, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Vallitu PK. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:565–72.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. J Dent. 2006;34:19–25.PubMedCrossRef

46.

De Kuijper M, Gresnigt M, Van den Houten M, Haumahu D, Schepke U, Cune MS. Fracture strength of various types of large direct composite and indirect glass ceramic restorations. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):433–42.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, Kuijs RH. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2008;36(10):828–32.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Loomans B, Hilton T. Extended resin composite restorations: techniques and procedures. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S58–67.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Von Stein-Lausnitz M, Mehnert A, Bruhnke M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Spies BC, Bitter K, Naumann M. Direct or indirect restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with class III defects? Composite vs veneer or crown restoration. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(6):519–26.

50.

Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002;35:575–81.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Valdivia ADCM, Rodrigues MP, Bicalho AA, Van Meerbeek B, Sloten JV, Pessoa RSE, Soares CJ. Biomechanical effect of ferrule on incisors restored with a fiberglass post and lithium-disilicate ceramic crown after thermal cycling and fatigue loading. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):133–42.PubMed

52.

Gotto Y, Swift EJ. Ferrules for endodontically treated teeth. J Esth Rest Dent. 2009;21(5):292–3.CrossRef

53.

Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior upper teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(4):290–6.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:36–40.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:78–82.PubMed

56.

Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lueckel H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(4):432–5.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Bousnaki M, Chatziparaskeva M, Bakopoulou A, Pissiotis A, Koidis P. Variables affecting the fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(5):686–92.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:442–8.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent. 2007;35(10):778–86.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, Krastl G. Ferrule comes first. Post is second! Fake news and alternative facts? A systematic review. J Endod. 2018;44(2):212–9.

61.

Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, De Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent. 2003;28:127–35.PubMed

62.

Zhu Z, Dong XY, He S, Pan X, Tang L. Effect of post placement on the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(5):475–83.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Ross RS, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endod. 1991;17:450–6.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Kuttler S, McLean A, Dorn S, Fischzang A. The impact of post space preparation with gates-glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(7):903–9.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2010;36(4):609–17.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Pilo R, Shapenco E, Lewinstein I. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(4):267–73.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Fokkinga WA, Le Bell AM, Kreulen CM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Int Endod J. 2005;38:230–7.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Oper Dent. 2003;28:86–91.PubMed

69.

Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:304–8.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30(2):220–7.PubMed

71.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999;27:275–8.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater. 2005;21:75–82.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Grande NM, Plotino G, Ioppolo P, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. The effect of custom adaptation and span-diameter ratio on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Dent. 2009;37(5):383–9.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:527–32.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Lustig JP, Tamse A, Fuss Z. Pattern of bone resorption in vertically fractured, endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg. 2000;90:224–7.

76.

Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000;13:15B-18B.PubMed

77.

Hedlund S-O, Johansson NG, Sjögren G. A retrospective study of prefabricated carbon fibre root canal posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(10):1036–40.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries, and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:749–57.

79.

Wu MK, Van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. Comparison of mandibular premolars and canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture. J Dent. 2004;32:265–8.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Simon JHS, Dogan H, Ceresa LM, Silver GK. The radicular groove: its potential clinical significance. J Endod. 2000;26:295–8.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Carlsen O. Dental morphology: the maxillary premolars. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1987.

82.

Metzger Z, Abramovitz R, Abramovitz L, Tagger M. Correlation between remaining length of root canal fillings after immediate post space preparation and coronal leakage. J Endod. 2000;26:724–8.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:140–7.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (Evaluation of Fatigue Behavior, Interfaces, and in Vivo Studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117–29.PubMed

85.

Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod. 1998;24:703–8.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:657–67.PubMed

87.

Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg. 2004;97:381–7.

88.

Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod. 2001;27:753–7.PubMedCrossRef

89.

Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004;32:55–65.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater. 2004;20:862–72.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003;3:199–205.CrossRef

92.

Van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(9):1101–7.

93.

Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):967–77.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(1):129–37.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Healey D, Lyons K. Evidence-based practice in dentistry. N Z Dent J. 2002;98(432):32–5.PubMed

Titel: Restauratie na endodontische behandeling
Auteur: Dr. H. P. B. Bolhuis
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Endodontologie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2766-9

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2767-6

Copyright: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2767-6_21

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

21. Restauratie na endodontische behandeling

Samenvatting

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Welkom bij THIM Hogeschool voor Fysiotherapie & Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Registreer

Login

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen